Cybersecurity · head to head
Bitdefender VPN vs MyRec.com

Bitdefender VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN sold by Bitdefender that runs on network infrastructure licensed from a third party rather than its own.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

MyRec.com
Government
Recreation management for small parks departments, priced on your annual revenue with no contract
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bitdefender VPN the network is not Bitdefender's: the servers and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, formerly Pango and AnchorFree, so the company physically handling your traffic and subject to legal process is a United States based third party, not the Romanian vendor whose brand is on the client.; MyRec.com the annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.
- They diverge on capability: Bitdefender VPN covers Suite integration, MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bitdefender VPN and MyRec.com actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bitdefender VPN | MyRec.com |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Per year by department annual revenue |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bitdefender VPN
- Suite integration
- Catapult Hydra transport
- WireGuard support
- Kill switch
- Auto-connect rules
- Split tunnelling
- Ad and tracker blocking
- Free tier included
Only in MyRec.com
- Revenue-based annual fee
- Programme registration
- Facility reservations
- Point of sale
- League scheduling
- Everything included
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bitdefender VPN
- An existing Bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public Wi-Fi without evaluating and buying a second productnot MyRec.com
- Households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual VPN use across a few devicesnot MyRec.com
- Hiding browsing activity from an internet service provider or a shared network operator rather than defeating a determined adversarynot MyRec.com
- Occasional access to region-locked content where a dedicated streaming-focused VPN would be more product than the need justifiesnot MyRec.com
MyRec.com
- A town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheetnot Bitdefender VPN
- A department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor ratenot Bitdefender VPN
- Replacing a system that charges per module, where every new programme type triggered an upsellnot Bitdefender VPN
- A department needing field permits and league scheduling without buying a facilities management suitenot Bitdefender VPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bitdefender VPN
- The network is not Bitdefender's: the servers and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, formerly Pango and AnchorFree, so the company physically handling your traffic and subject to legal process is a United States based third party, not the Romanian vendor whose brand is on the client.
- Catapult Hydra is proprietary and closed source, so unlike OpenVPN or WireGuard there is no public implementation for researchers to audit, and a buyer choosing on cryptographic grounds has nothing to inspect.
- There is no published independent no-logs audit of this service comparable to the Deloitte, PwC and KPMG engagements the standalone VPN vendors commission, so the no-logging position rests on the privacy policies of two separate companies rather than on any external assurance.
- The free tier bundled with the antivirus suites is capped at a small daily allowance and selects the server for you, so it is a demonstration rather than a usable VPN, and customers who assumed their suite included a VPN find they need a further paid upgrade.
- Feature depth is well below the dedicated market: no port forwarding, no dedicated IP, no multi-hop, no city-level server selection and no Linux or router client, so routers, NAS devices, consoles and anything needing an inbound connection cannot be covered at all.
MyRec.com
- The annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.
- It is built for small and mid-sized departments and lacks the permitting, aquatics and multi-facility depth a large city requires.
- Credit card processing is explicitly excluded from the fee, so the total cost depends on a merchant agreement the department must source and negotiate itself.
- Integration surface is thin, with no meaningful connection to municipal ERP or finance systems, meaning revenue reconciliation is a manual export.
- The vendor is small, so there is limited third-party consulting capacity and a narrow bench for support during peak registration periods.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bitdefender VPN
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Bitdefender VPN review.
MyRec.com
On request- MyRec.com$undefined/year
- Single annual fee calculated from department annual revenue
- Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD per year
- Site build, onboarding and training included
Which should you pick?
Choose Bitdefender VPN if
- You need suite integration.
- You also want catapult hydra transport.
Choose MyRec.com if
- You need revenue-based annual fee.
- You also want programme registration.
Questions people ask
- Is Bitdefender VPN or MyRec.com better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bitdefender VPN starts at On request and MyRec.com at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bitdefender VPN or MyRec.com?
- Bitdefender VPN starts at On request and MyRec.com at On request.
- Does Bitdefender VPN or MyRec.com run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Bitdefender VPN best used for?
- Bitdefender VPN is most often used for an existing bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public wi-fi without evaluating and buying a second product, households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual vpn use across a few devices, hiding browsing activity from an internet service provider or a shared network operator rather than defeating a determined adversary, occasional access to region-locked content where a dedicated streaming-focused vpn would be more product than the need justifies. Of those, an existing bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public wi-fi without evaluating and buying a second product and households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual vpn use across a few devices are not what MyRec.com is typically brought in for.
- What can Bitdefender VPN do that MyRec.com cannot?
- Bitdefender VPN covers Suite integration, Catapult Hydra transport, WireGuard support, Kill switch. MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee, Programme registration, Facility reservations, Point of sale.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bitdefender VPN: Who actually operates the servers?
The underlying VPN network and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, previously known as Pango and AnchorFree, the operator of Hotspot Shield. Bitdefender identifies the arrangement in its VPN terms. Your traffic therefore passes through a United States based provider's infrastructure.
MyRec.com: How is MyRec priced?
A single annual fee calculated from your department annual revenue, using a calculator on the MyRec site. Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD a year.
Bitdefender VPN: Is the free version enough?
Only as a taster. It is capped at a small daily traffic allowance and chooses the server itself, which rules out streaming and any sustained use. It exists to demonstrate the feature inside the antivirus suite.
MyRec.com: Is there a setup fee?
No. Site build, onboarding and training are included in the annual fee.
Bitdefender VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
There is no published independent no-logs audit of this service equivalent to those commissioned by the dedicated VPN providers. If an audited no-logging claim is what you are buying, this is not the product for it.
MyRec.com: Are card fees included?
No. Credit card processing is separate and you arrange your own merchant account.
Bitdefender VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Sometimes, but it is not built around that use case, there is no per-service server labelling, and there is no commitment to restoring access when a platform blocks a range. A streaming-focused provider is a better fit if that is the reason you want a VPN.
MyRec.com: Is there a contract?
No long-term contract is required, which is unusual in municipal software.
Bitdefender VPN: Can I run it on Linux or a router?
No. There is no Linux client and no router firmware or manual configuration option, so coverage is limited to the Windows, macOS, iOS and Android clients.
Related pages
More on Bitdefender VPN
Other head to heads
- Bitdefender VPN vs 1Password
- Bitdefender VPN vs Norton 360
- Bitdefender VPN vs LastPass
- Bitdefender VPN vs IBM QRadar
- Bitdefender VPN vs Quantexa
- Bitdefender VPN vs ExpressVPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs NordVPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Bitdefender VPN vs Jamf Pro
- Bitdefender VPN vs Proofpoint
- Bitdefender VPN vs March Networks
- Bitdefender VPN vs Jumio
- Bitdefender VPN vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Bitdefender VPN vs LogicManager
- Bitdefender VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Private Internet Access
- Bitdefender VPN vs CyberGhost VPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs CivicPlus
- Bitdefender VPN vs OpenGov
- Bitdefender VPN vs RecDesk
- Bitdefender VPN vs Euna Solutions
- Bitdefender VPN vs Springbrook Software
- Bitdefender VPN vs Periscope Holdings
- Bitdefender VPN vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Bitdefender VPN vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Bitdefender VPN vs GovPilot
- Bitdefender VPN vs eCode360
- Bitdefender VPN vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Bitdefender VPN vs IAPro
- Bitdefender VPN vs iCompass
- Bitdefender VPN vs Mapbox Government
- Bitdefender VPN vs Mark43
- Bitdefender VPN vs MuckRock
- Bitdefender VPN vs Municode
- Bitdefender VPN vs Rock Solid
- MyRec.com vs 1Password
- MyRec.com vs Norton 360
- MyRec.com vs LastPass
- MyRec.com vs IBM QRadar
- MyRec.com vs Quantexa
- MyRec.com vs ExpressVPN
- MyRec.com vs NordVPN
- MyRec.com vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- MyRec.com vs Jamf Pro
- MyRec.com vs Proofpoint
- MyRec.com vs March Networks
- MyRec.com vs Jumio
- MyRec.com vs Kaspersky Total Security
- MyRec.com vs LogicManager
- MyRec.com vs Mullvad VPN
- MyRec.com vs Private Internet Access
- MyRec.com vs CyberGhost VPN
- MyRec.com vs CivicPlus
- MyRec.com vs OpenGov
- MyRec.com vs RecDesk
- MyRec.com vs Euna Solutions
- MyRec.com vs Springbrook Software
- MyRec.com vs Periscope Holdings
- MyRec.com vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs GovPilot
- MyRec.com vs eCode360
- MyRec.com vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- MyRec.com vs IAPro
- MyRec.com vs iCompass
- MyRec.com vs Mapbox Government
- MyRec.com vs Mark43
- MyRec.com vs MuckRock
- MyRec.com vs Municode
- MyRec.com vs Rock Solid
