Cybersecurity · head to head
Bitdefender VPN vs Fig

Bitdefender VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN sold by Bitdefender that runs on network infrastructure licensed from a third party rather than its own.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Fig has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Bitdefender VPN the network is not Bitdefender's: the servers and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, formerly Pango and AnchorFree, so the company physically handling your traffic and subject to legal process is a United States based third party, not the Romanian vendor whose brand is on the client.; Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bitdefender VPN and Fig actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bitdefender VPN | Fig |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2020 |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bitdefender VPN
- Suite integration
- Catapult Hydra transport
- WireGuard support
- Kill switch
- Auto-connect rules
- Split tunnelling
- Ad and tracker blocking
- Free tier included
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Bitdefender VPN does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bitdefender VPN
- An existing Bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public Wi-Fi without evaluating and buying a second productnot Fig
- Households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual VPN use across a few devicesnot Fig
- Hiding browsing activity from an internet service provider or a shared network operator rather than defeating a determined adversarynot Fig
- Occasional access to region-locked content where a dedicated streaming-focused VPN would be more product than the need justifiesnot Fig
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bitdefender VPN
- The network is not Bitdefender's: the servers and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, formerly Pango and AnchorFree, so the company physically handling your traffic and subject to legal process is a United States based third party, not the Romanian vendor whose brand is on the client.
- Catapult Hydra is proprietary and closed source, so unlike OpenVPN or WireGuard there is no public implementation for researchers to audit, and a buyer choosing on cryptographic grounds has nothing to inspect.
- There is no published independent no-logs audit of this service comparable to the Deloitte, PwC and KPMG engagements the standalone VPN vendors commission, so the no-logging position rests on the privacy policies of two separate companies rather than on any external assurance.
- The free tier bundled with the antivirus suites is capped at a small daily allowance and selects the server for you, so it is a demonstration rather than a usable VPN, and customers who assumed their suite included a VPN find they need a further paid upgrade.
- Feature depth is well below the dedicated market: no port forwarding, no dedicated IP, no multi-hop, no city-level server selection and no Linux or router client, so routers, NAS devices, consoles and anything needing an inbound connection cannot be covered at all.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Pricing, plan by plan
Bitdefender VPN
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Bitdefender VPN review.
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Bitdefender VPN if
- You need suite integration.
- You also want catapult hydra transport.
Questions people ask
- Is Bitdefender VPN or Fig better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bitdefender VPN starts at On request and Fig at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bitdefender VPN or Fig?
- Fig has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Bitdefender VPN and Free for Fig.
- Does Bitdefender VPN or Fig run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Yes. Fig has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Bitdefender VPN starts at On request.
- What is Bitdefender VPN best used for?
- Bitdefender VPN is most often used for an existing bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public wi-fi without evaluating and buying a second product, households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual vpn use across a few devices, hiding browsing activity from an internet service provider or a shared network operator rather than defeating a determined adversary, occasional access to region-locked content where a dedicated streaming-focused vpn would be more product than the need justifies. Of those, an existing bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public wi-fi without evaluating and buying a second product and households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual vpn use across a few devices are not what Fig is typically brought in for.
- What can Bitdefender VPN do that Fig cannot?
- Bitdefender VPN covers Suite integration, Catapult Hydra transport, WireGuard support, Kill switch.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bitdefender VPN: Who actually operates the servers?
The underlying VPN network and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, previously known as Pango and AnchorFree, the operator of Hotspot Shield. Bitdefender identifies the arrangement in its VPN terms. Your traffic therefore passes through a United States based provider's infrastructure.
Bitdefender VPN: Is the free version enough?
Only as a taster. It is capped at a small daily traffic allowance and chooses the server itself, which rules out streaming and any sustained use. It exists to demonstrate the feature inside the antivirus suite.
Bitdefender VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
There is no published independent no-logs audit of this service equivalent to those commissioned by the dedicated VPN providers. If an audited no-logging claim is what you are buying, this is not the product for it.
Bitdefender VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Sometimes, but it is not built around that use case, there is no per-service server labelling, and there is no commitment to restoring access when a platform blocks a range. A streaming-focused provider is a better fit if that is the reason you want a VPN.
Bitdefender VPN: Can I run it on Linux or a router?
No. There is no Linux client and no router firmware or manual configuration option, so coverage is limited to the Windows, macOS, iOS and Android clients.
Related pages
More on Bitdefender VPN
Other head to heads
- Bitdefender VPN vs 1Password
- Bitdefender VPN vs Norton 360
- Bitdefender VPN vs LastPass
- Bitdefender VPN vs IBM QRadar
- Bitdefender VPN vs Quantexa
- Bitdefender VPN vs ExpressVPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs NordVPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Bitdefender VPN vs Jamf Pro
- Bitdefender VPN vs Proofpoint
- Bitdefender VPN vs March Networks
- Bitdefender VPN vs Jumio
- Bitdefender VPN vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Bitdefender VPN vs LogicManager
- Bitdefender VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Private Internet Access
- Bitdefender VPN vs CyberGhost VPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Visual Studio Code
- Bitdefender VPN vs ESLint
- Bitdefender VPN vs Turborepo
- Bitdefender VPN vs pnpm
- Bitdefender VPN vs Sweep
- Bitdefender VPN vs Cody
- Bitdefender VPN vs Warp
- Bitdefender VPN vs Keycloak
- Bitdefender VPN vs Rust
- Bitdefender VPN vs CodeSandbox
- Bitdefender VPN vs Vite
- Bitdefender VPN vs Daytona
- Bitdefender VPN vs Visual Studio
- Bitdefender VPN vs Xlinesoft
- Bitdefender VPN vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Bitdefender VPN vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs 1Password
- Fig vs Norton 360
- Fig vs LastPass
- Fig vs IBM QRadar
- Fig vs Quantexa
- Fig vs ExpressVPN
- Fig vs NordVPN
- Fig vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Fig vs Jamf Pro
- Fig vs Proofpoint
- Fig vs March Networks
- Fig vs Jumio
- Fig vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Fig vs LogicManager
- Fig vs Mullvad VPN
- Fig vs Private Internet Access
- Fig vs CyberGhost VPN
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
