Machine Learning · head to head
BigQuery ML vs Quadratic

Quadratic
Spreadsheets
Infinite-canvas spreadsheet that runs Python, SQL and formulas in the same grid
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: BigQuery ML not available in BigQuery's Standard edition, so the cheapest tier cannot use it; Quadratic aI usage is metered as a dollar allowance rather than a flat entitlement, so a team that adopts the agent enthusiastically will exhaust 20 USD per user per month quickly and the true cost per seat becomes unpredictable.
- They diverge on capability: BigQuery ML covers SQL-based ML, Quadratic covers Multi-language cells.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which BigQuery ML and Quadratic actually diverge.
| Attribute | BigQuery ML | Quadratic |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web | Web, macOS, Windows, Linux |
| Category | Machine Learning | Spreadsheets |
| Founded | 2008 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in BigQuery ML
- SQL-based ML
- AutoML Tables
- Model export
- Prediction functions
- Feature preprocessing
- BigQuery
- Vertex AI
- TensorFlow
Only in Quadratic
- Multi-language cells
- Infinite canvas
- Direct database connections
- AI agent in the sheet
- WebAssembly engine
- Python package support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
BigQuery ML
- Training models in SQL without exporting datanot Quadratic
- Linear and logistic regression on warehouse datanot Quadratic
- K-means clustering and matrix factorisation for recommendationsnot Quadratic
- Time series forecasting with ARIMA_PLUSnot Quadratic
- Running imported ONNX, TensorFlow or XGBoost models against BigQuery datanot Quadratic
Quadratic
- An analyst who wants a SQL result, a Python transformation and a set of manual assumptions visible in one file instead of three toolsnot BigQuery ML
- Ad hoc modelling where part of the logic is genuinely code and part is a judgement call typed into a cellnot BigQuery ML
- Sharing a reproducible analysis with a colleague who will only ever open a spreadsheet, not a notebooknot BigQuery ML
- Prototyping a data pull against a warehouse before committing it to a scheduled pipelinenot BigQuery ML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
BigQuery ML
- Not available in BigQuery's Standard edition, so the cheapest tier cannot use it
- Billed through BigQuery compute and storage rather than as its own product, so training cost tracks data scanned
- Remote models incur extra Agent Platform charges on top
- Externally trained model types such as boosted trees and AutoML run through Agent Platform rather than inside BigQuery
Quadratic
- AI usage is metered as a dollar allowance rather than a flat entitlement, so a team that adopts the agent enthusiastically will exhaust 20 USD per user per month quickly and the true cost per seat becomes unpredictable.
- Self-hosting is available only on the Enterprise plan, so an organisation that cannot send data to the vendor cloud has to enter a sales negotiation rather than run a container.
- Excel and Google Sheets compatibility is partial, so files with heavy conditional formatting, pivot tables or macros do not survive a round trip and have to be rebuilt.
- The product is young and the connector list is short, covering the main relational databases and two warehouses, so anything else has to be reached through Python code you write and maintain yourself.
- There is no real mobile editing experience, which matters more than it sounds for a spreadsheet because approvals and quick checks routinely happen on a phone.
Pricing, plan by plan
BigQuery ML
Free- Free TierFree
- 10GB storage
- 1TB queries
- On-Demand$5/TB
- Pay per TB scanned
- ML training costs
Quadratic
Free- PersonalFree
- Limited AI usage
- Limited files and connections
- Limited sharing
- Pro$18/month
- Billed annually
- 20 USD of AI credits per month
- Unlimited files
- Business$36/month
- Billed annually
- 40 USD of AI credits per month
- Advanced permissions
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Quoted
- Self-hosting option
- Custom AI usage
Which should you pick?
Choose BigQuery ML if
- You need sql-based ml.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automl tables.
Choose Quadratic if
- You need multi-language cells.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- You also want infinite canvas.
Questions people ask
- Is BigQuery ML or Quadratic better?
- Neither clearly leads. BigQuery ML starts at Free and Quadratic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, BigQuery ML or Quadratic?
- BigQuery ML starts at Free and Quadratic at Free.
- Does BigQuery ML or Quadratic run on more platforms?
- BigQuery ML runs on Web. Quadratic runs on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use BigQuery ML for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is BigQuery ML best used for?
- BigQuery ML is most often used for training models in sql without exporting data, linear and logistic regression on warehouse data, k-means clustering and matrix factorisation for recommendations, time series forecasting with arima_plus. Of those, training models in sql without exporting data and linear and logistic regression on warehouse data are not what Quadratic is typically brought in for.
- What can BigQuery ML do that Quadratic cannot?
- BigQuery ML covers SQL-based ML, AutoML Tables, Model export, Prediction functions. Quadratic covers Multi-language cells, Infinite canvas, Direct database connections, AI agent in the sheet.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
BigQuery ML: How much does Google Cloud BigQuery ML cost?
BigQuery ML pricing is not specified separately on Google Cloud's pricing page. It follows the same pay-as-you-go model as BigQuery, charging per terabyte of data scanned during analysis. Customers receive $300 in free credits and can use 20+ products free up to monthly limits.
SourceQuadratic: Do I need to know Python to use it?
No, formulas work on their own, but the reason to choose Quadratic over Google Sheets is the code cells, so a team with no Python will not get the value.
BigQuery ML: Does Google Cloud offer a free trial?
Yes, new customers get $300 in free credits and all customers can use 20+ Google Cloud products free up to their monthly usage limits.
SourceQuadratic: What happens when the AI credits run out?
Prompting stops until the next monthly reset or until you move up a plan; the spreadsheet itself keeps working normally.
Quadratic: Can it replace a BI tool?
Not for scheduled distribution or governed metrics. It is for exploratory work by one person or a small team, not for dashboards a hundred people read.
Quadratic: Is my database query sent to the vendor?
Connections run through the vendor service on all plans except Enterprise self-hosting, which is the option to take if that is unacceptable.
Related pages
More on BigQuery ML
Other head to heads
- BigQuery ML vs AWS SageMaker
- BigQuery ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- BigQuery ML vs DataRobot
- BigQuery ML vs Databricks
- BigQuery ML vs SAS
- BigQuery ML vs scikit-learn
- BigQuery ML vs Snowflake
- BigQuery ML vs Weka
- BigQuery ML vs MATLAB
- BigQuery ML vs Palantir Foundry
- BigQuery ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- BigQuery ML vs Hugging Face
- BigQuery ML vs Kubeflow
- BigQuery ML vs Langwatch
- BigQuery ML vs LlamaIndex
- BigQuery ML vs Milvus
- BigQuery ML vs Neptune.ai
- BigQuery ML vs Amazon Redshift ML
- BigQuery ML vs Metabase
- BigQuery ML vs Equals
- BigQuery ML vs Redash
- BigQuery ML vs Coefficient
- BigQuery ML vs Cube Software
- BigQuery ML vs Rowy
- BigQuery ML vs Zoho Sheet
- BigQuery ML vs Sigma Computing
- BigQuery ML vs Teable
- BigQuery ML vs Tableau
- BigQuery ML vs Looker
- BigQuery ML vs Fibery
- BigQuery ML vs Mathesar
- BigQuery ML vs SeaTable
- Quadratic vs AWS SageMaker
- Quadratic vs Azure Machine Learning
- Quadratic vs DataRobot
- Quadratic vs Databricks
- Quadratic vs SAS
- Quadratic vs scikit-learn
- Quadratic vs Snowflake
- Quadratic vs Weka
- Quadratic vs MATLAB
- Quadratic vs Palantir Foundry
- Quadratic vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Quadratic vs Hugging Face
- Quadratic vs Kubeflow
- Quadratic vs Langwatch
- Quadratic vs LlamaIndex
- Quadratic vs Milvus
- Quadratic vs Neptune.ai
- Quadratic vs Amazon Redshift ML
- Quadratic vs Metabase
- Quadratic vs Equals
- Quadratic vs Redash
- Quadratic vs Coefficient
- Quadratic vs Cube Software
- Quadratic vs Rowy
- Quadratic vs Zoho Sheet
- Quadratic vs Sigma Computing
- Quadratic vs Teable
- Quadratic vs Tableau
- Quadratic vs Looker
- Quadratic vs Fibery
- Quadratic vs Mathesar
- Quadratic vs SeaTable

