Machine Learning · head to head
BigQuery ML vs Mode
The short version
- Each has a real cost: BigQuery ML not available in BigQuery's Standard edition, so the cheapest tier cannot use it; Mode free tier limited to 4GB RAM and 1 CPU for SQL notebooks, insufficient for large datasets
- They diverge on capability: BigQuery ML covers SQL-based ML, Mode covers SQL Editor.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which BigQuery ML and Mode actually diverge.
| Attribute | BigQuery ML | Mode |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Category | Machine Learning | Business Intelligence |
| Founded | 2008 | 2013 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in BigQuery ML
- SQL-based ML
- AutoML Tables
- Model export
- Prediction functions
- Feature preprocessing
- Vertex AI
- TensorFlow
- Cloud Storage
Only in Mode
- SQL Editor
- Python/R Notebooks
- Interactive Reports
- Version Control
- Scheduling
- Snowflake
- Redshift
- PostgreSQL
Both cover
- BigQuery
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
BigQuery ML
- Training models in SQL without exporting datanot Mode
- Linear and logistic regression on warehouse datanot Mode
- K-means clustering and matrix factorisation for recommendationsnot Mode
- Time series forecasting with ARIMA_PLUSnot Mode
- Running imported ONNX, TensorFlow or XGBoost models against BigQuery datanot Mode
Mode
- Self-service analyticsnot BigQuery ML
- Data explorationnot BigQuery ML
- Ad-hoc reportingnot BigQuery ML
- Collaborative analysisnot BigQuery ML
- Embedded analyticsnot BigQuery ML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
BigQuery ML
- Not available in BigQuery's Standard edition, so the cheapest tier cannot use it
- Billed through BigQuery compute and storage rather than as its own product, so training cost tracks data scanned
- Remote models incur extra Agent Platform charges on top
- Externally trained model types such as boosted trees and AutoML run through Agent Platform rather than inside BigQuery
Mode
- Free tier limited to 4GB RAM and 1 CPU for SQL notebooks, insufficient for large datasets
- Requires SQL knowledge for most analysis tasks, creating dependency on technical resources
- Paid plan pricing not publicly listed; requires sales consultation
- Recently acquired by ThoughtSpot in 2026, creating product direction uncertainty
- Limited customization options for visual aspects and embedded analytics
Pricing, plan by plan
BigQuery ML
Free- Free TierFree
- 10GB storage
- 1TB queries
- On-Demand$5/TB
- Pay per TB scanned
- ML training costs
Mode
Free- FreeFree
- SQL Editor
- Python/R Notebooks
- Basic Charts
- Business$65/month
- Advanced Visualizations
- Collaboration
- Integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose BigQuery ML if
- You need sql-based ml.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automl tables.
Choose Mode if
- You need sql editor.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want python/r notebooks.
Questions people ask
- Is BigQuery ML or Mode better?
- Neither clearly leads. BigQuery ML starts at Free and Mode at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, BigQuery ML or Mode?
- BigQuery ML starts at Free and Mode at Free.
- Does BigQuery ML or Mode run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use BigQuery ML for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is BigQuery ML best used for?
- BigQuery ML is most often used for training models in sql without exporting data, linear and logistic regression on warehouse data, k-means clustering and matrix factorisation for recommendations, time series forecasting with arima_plus. Of those, training models in sql without exporting data and linear and logistic regression on warehouse data are not what Mode is typically brought in for.
- What can BigQuery ML do that Mode cannot?
- BigQuery ML covers SQL-based ML, AutoML Tables, Model export, Prediction functions. Mode covers SQL Editor, Python/R Notebooks, Interactive Reports, Version Control. Both handle BigQuery, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
BigQuery ML: How much does Google Cloud BigQuery ML cost?
BigQuery ML pricing is not specified separately on Google Cloud's pricing page. It follows the same pay-as-you-go model as BigQuery, charging per terabyte of data scanned during analysis. Customers receive $300 in free credits and can use 20+ products free up to monthly limits.
SourceMode: What languages does Mode support for analysis?
Mode notebooks support SQL, Python (3.11 with pandas, NumPy, scikit-learn, matplotlib), and R (4.2.0 with ggplot2, dplyr, tidyr). Both Python and R allow additional library installation at runtime.
SourceBigQuery ML: Does Google Cloud offer a free trial?
Yes, new customers get $300 in free credits and all customers can use 20+ Google Cloud products free up to their monthly usage limits.
SourceMode: Can I integrate Mode notebook results into reports?
Yes. Mode allows adding notebook cell results directly to reports, with synchronized scheduling so reports re-run to keep data current.
SourceMode: Does Mode support collaborative analysis?
Yes. Mode notebooks provide moveable code blocks and markdown cells enabling exploratory analysis and team collaboration on data queries and visualizations.
SourceRelated pages
More on BigQuery ML
Other head to heads
- BigQuery ML vs AWS SageMaker
- BigQuery ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- BigQuery ML vs DataRobot
- BigQuery ML vs Databricks
- BigQuery ML vs SAS
- BigQuery ML vs scikit-learn
- BigQuery ML vs Snowflake
- BigQuery ML vs Weka
- BigQuery ML vs MATLAB
- BigQuery ML vs Palantir Foundry
- BigQuery ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- BigQuery ML vs Hugging Face
- BigQuery ML vs Kubeflow
- BigQuery ML vs Langwatch
- BigQuery ML vs LlamaIndex
- BigQuery ML vs Milvus
- BigQuery ML vs Neptune.ai
- BigQuery ML vs Amazon Redshift ML
- BigQuery ML vs Periscope Data
- BigQuery ML vs Domo
- BigQuery ML vs Fabi
- BigQuery ML vs Deepnote
- BigQuery ML vs Yellowfin
- BigQuery ML vs TIBCO Spotfire
- BigQuery ML vs Hex
- BigQuery ML vs GoodData
- BigQuery ML vs Grow
- BigQuery ML vs Qlik Sense
- BigQuery ML vs Databox
- BigQuery ML vs Cube
- BigQuery ML vs Jedox
- BigQuery ML vs Logi Analytics
- BigQuery ML vs Luzmo
- BigQuery ML vs NetBase Quid
- BigQuery ML vs Phocas
- BigQuery ML vs Preset
- Mode vs AWS SageMaker
- Mode vs Azure Machine Learning
- Mode vs DataRobot
- Mode vs Databricks
- Mode vs SAS
- Mode vs scikit-learn
- Mode vs Snowflake
- Mode vs Weka
- Mode vs MATLAB
- Mode vs Palantir Foundry
- Mode vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Mode vs Hugging Face
- Mode vs Kubeflow
- Mode vs Langwatch
- Mode vs LlamaIndex
- Mode vs Milvus
- Mode vs Neptune.ai
- Mode vs Amazon Redshift ML
- Mode vs Periscope Data
- Mode vs Domo
- Mode vs Fabi
- Mode vs Deepnote
- Mode vs Yellowfin
- Mode vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Mode vs Hex
- Mode vs GoodData
- Mode vs Grow
- Mode vs Qlik Sense
- Mode vs Databox
- Mode vs Cube
- Mode vs Jedox
- Mode vs Logi Analytics
- Mode vs Luzmo
- Mode vs NetBase Quid
- Mode vs Phocas
- Mode vs Preset


