Cybersecurity · head to head
BeyondTrust vs Cortex
BeyondTrust
Cybersecurity
Privileged access management, endpoint privilege management and secure remote access
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
Cortex
Developer Tools
Internal developer portal that scores service ownership and maturity rather than just cataloguing services
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: BeyondTrust the product lines came from separate origins and still have separate consoles, so buying the suite does not deliver the single pane of glass the bundle implies.; Cortex pricing is quote only, so a platform team cannot build a business case or compare against the true cost of self-hosted Backstage without entering a sales cycle first.
- They diverge on capability: BeyondTrust covers Password Safe, Cortex covers Service catalogue.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which BeyondTrust and Cortex actually diverge.
| Attribute | BeyondTrust | Cortex |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, Web | Web, API |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in BeyondTrust
- Password Safe
- Endpoint Privilege Management
- Privileged Remote Access
- Remote Support
- Discovery
- Session recording
Only in Cortex
- Service catalogue
- Scorecards
- Initiatives
- Self-service templates
- Query language
- Eng intelligence
- Integrations layer
- On-call and ownership mapping
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
BeyondTrust
- An organisation removing local administrator rights across thousands of Windows endpoints without swamping the service desknot Cortex
- A utility required to record every privileged session on operational systems for regulatory auditnot Cortex
- A firm giving external maintenance vendors access to specific servers without handing over credentialsnot Cortex
- A helpdesk consolidating remote support and privileged access onto one audited path rather than an unmanaged remote toolnot Cortex
Cortex
- A platform team that needs to prove to leadership how far a Kubernetes or framework migration has actually progressed across hundreds of servicesnot BeyondTrust
- An organisation where ownership of production services is genuinely unknown after reorganisations or acquisitionsnot BeyondTrust
- Enforcing production readiness standards on new services at creation time rather than at incident reviewnot BeyondTrust
- Replacing a self-hosted Backstage that is consuming a full-time engineer or two just to stay upgradednot BeyondTrust
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
BeyondTrust
- The product lines came from separate origins and still have separate consoles, so buying the suite does not deliver the single pane of glass the bundle implies.
- Licensing metrics differ between products, per managed account, per endpoint, per concurrent session, which makes multi-product quotes hard to compare with competitors and hard to forecast as you grow.
- Self-hosted deployments carry real infrastructure and upgrade burden, and organisations without a dedicated PAM administrator find the system drifts out of maintenance.
- Endpoint privilege management requires sustained rule authoring as applications change, so the first-year saving in helpdesk tickets erodes if nobody owns the policy afterwards.
- Discovery finds far more privileged accounts than most organisations expect, which is valuable but converts a licence purchase into a longer remediation programme before the control is real.
Cortex
- Pricing is quote only, so a platform team cannot build a business case or compare against the true cost of self-hosted Backstage without entering a sales cycle first.
- The catalogue is only as accurate as the metadata you supply, so an organisation with inconsistent repository conventions spends its first quarter cleaning data before any scorecard means anything.
- Scorecards create political friction: publishing a per-team grade turns an engineering standard into a performance metric, and teams will game the rules rather than fix the underlying issue.
- It is closed source and hosted, so organisations with strict data residency or air-gap requirements have limited options compared with running Backstage themselves.
- Value scales with organisation size, so a company with fifty engineers and thirty services will find the catalogue tells them nothing they did not already know while still paying an enterprise contract.
Pricing, plan by plan
BeyondTrust
On request- BeyondTrust Platform$undefined/year
- Password Safe priced by managed asset or account
- Endpoint Privilege Management priced per endpoint
- Remote access products priced per concurrent licence or endpoint
Cortex
On request- Cortex$undefined/year
- Service catalogue and ownership mapping
- Scorecards and initiatives
- Self-service templates
Which should you pick?
Choose BeyondTrust if
- You need password safe.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web.
- You also want endpoint privilege management.
Choose Cortex if
- You need service catalogue.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want scorecards.
Questions people ask
- Is BeyondTrust or Cortex better?
- Neither clearly leads. BeyondTrust starts at On request and Cortex at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, BeyondTrust or Cortex?
- BeyondTrust starts at On request and Cortex at On request.
- Does BeyondTrust or Cortex run on more platforms?
- BeyondTrust runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Web. Cortex runs on Web, API.
- What is BeyondTrust best used for?
- BeyondTrust is most often used for an organisation removing local administrator rights across thousands of windows endpoints without swamping the service desk, a utility required to record every privileged session on operational systems for regulatory audit, a firm giving external maintenance vendors access to specific servers without handing over credentials, a helpdesk consolidating remote support and privileged access onto one audited path rather than an unmanaged remote tool. Of those, an organisation removing local administrator rights across thousands of windows endpoints without swamping the service desk and a utility required to record every privileged session on operational systems for regulatory audit are not what Cortex is typically brought in for.
- What can BeyondTrust do that Cortex cannot?
- BeyondTrust covers Password Safe, Endpoint Privilege Management, Privileged Remote Access, Remote Support. Cortex covers Service catalogue, Scorecards, Initiatives, Self-service templates.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
BeyondTrust: Is endpoint privilege management sold separately from the vault?
Yes. They are distinct products with distinct licensing metrics, and many customers buy only one.
Cortex: How is Cortex different from Backstage?
Backstage is an open source framework you build and staff. Cortex is a hosted product with scorecards and initiatives out of the box and no platform team required to keep it running.
BeyondTrust: Can it record vendor sessions?
Yes, with credential injection so the third party never learns the password, and full video and keystroke recording for audit.
Cortex: Is pricing published?
No. Cortex requires a sales conversation and prepares a custom proposal.
BeyondTrust: Is there a FedRAMP option?
BeyondTrust offers FedRAMP-authorised deployments for United States government buyers, which is often the deciding factor in that sector.
Cortex: Can it self-host?
It is offered as a hosted product; on-premise arrangements are handled through sales rather than published.
Cortex: What is the main adoption risk?
Bad or missing service metadata. The catalogue and every scorecard on top of it inherit whatever quality your repositories already have.
Related pages
More on BeyondTrust
Other head to heads
- BeyondTrust vs HashiCorp Boundary
- BeyondTrust vs Idira
- BeyondTrust vs HashiCorp Vault
- BeyondTrust vs Delinea
- BeyondTrust vs One Identity
- BeyondTrust vs Infisical
- BeyondTrust vs Saviynt
- BeyondTrust vs Teleport
- BeyondTrust vs Trend Micro Vision One
- BeyondTrust vs VMware Carbon Black
- BeyondTrust vs Genetec Security Center
- BeyondTrust vs Proton Mail
- BeyondTrust vs Brave Browser
- BeyondTrust vs March Networks
- BeyondTrust vs Salient CompleteView
- BeyondTrust vs Sumsub
- BeyondTrust vs Tuta
- BeyondTrust vs Camio
- BeyondTrust vs Backstage
- BeyondTrust vs OpsLevel
- BeyondTrust vs Earthly
- BeyondTrust vs Spacelift
- BeyondTrust vs Atlantis
- BeyondTrust vs Depot
- BeyondTrust vs Nix
- BeyondTrust vs SonarQube
- BeyondTrust vs Keycloak
- BeyondTrust vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- BeyondTrust vs Vite
- BeyondTrust vs Bazel
- BeyondTrust vs Dagger
- BeyondTrust vs Deep Code
- BeyondTrust vs Deno
- BeyondTrust vs Fig
- BeyondTrust vs Frappe
- BeyondTrust vs Git
- Cortex vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Cortex vs Idira
- Cortex vs HashiCorp Vault
- Cortex vs Delinea
- Cortex vs One Identity
- Cortex vs Infisical
- Cortex vs Saviynt
- Cortex vs Teleport
- Cortex vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Cortex vs VMware Carbon Black
- Cortex vs Genetec Security Center
- Cortex vs Proton Mail
- Cortex vs Brave Browser
- Cortex vs March Networks
- Cortex vs Salient CompleteView
- Cortex vs Sumsub
- Cortex vs Tuta
- Cortex vs Camio
- Cortex vs Backstage
- Cortex vs OpsLevel
- Cortex vs Earthly
- Cortex vs Spacelift
- Cortex vs Atlantis
- Cortex vs Depot
- Cortex vs Nix
- Cortex vs SonarQube
- Cortex vs Keycloak
- Cortex vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Cortex vs Vite
- Cortex vs Bazel
- Cortex vs Dagger
- Cortex vs Deep Code
- Cortex vs Deno
- Cortex vs Fig
- Cortex vs Frappe
- Cortex vs Git