CAD · head to head
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Propeller Aero

Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
CAD
Photogrammetry engine formerly sold as ContextCapture, now inside Bentley's iTwin line
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Propeller Aero
Construction
Drone survey processing and earthworks volume measurement for sites that measure stockpiles weekly
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler the rename from ContextCapture is more than cosmetic: licensing moved into Bentley's subscription and consumption model, and existing perpetual users should confirm what a renewal converts to before assuming continuity of cost.; Propeller Aero platform pricing is not published and is scoped by sites and users, so a contractor with many short-lived sites can be quoted very differently from one with a few long ones, and neither can benchmark against a list price
- They diverge on capability: Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler covers Aerial triangulation, Propeller Aero covers Photogrammetric processing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler and Propeller Aero actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler | Propeller Aero |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | Hardware purchase plus a quoted platform subscription |
| Platforms | Windows, Cloud | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | CAD | Construction |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Aerial triangulation
- Dense mesh reconstruction
- Point cloud fusion
- Orthophoto and DSM output
- 3D Tiles and 3MX export
- Distributed processing
- Retouching and editing
- Georeferencing and control
Only in Propeller Aero
- Photogrammetric processing
- AeroPoints ground control
- Volume measurement
- Design surface comparison
- Progress timeline
- Machine telemetry
- Corrections network
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- A highway authority reconstructing a corridor from drone imagery for design work in OpenRoadsnot Propeller Aero
- A survey firm delivering city-scale textured meshes to a municipal client for planning and visualisationnot Propeller Aero
- An engineering consultancy fusing terrestrial laser scans with drone photography of a bridge for condition assessmentnot Propeller Aero
- A team publishing streamable 3D Tiles of a construction site so stakeholders can view it in a browsernot Propeller Aero
Propeller Aero
- A quarry that reconciles stockpile inventory monthly for its accounts and wants the volume evidence to survive an auditnot Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- An earthworks contractor claiming progress payments on cubic metres moved who needs an independent measurement the client will acceptnot Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- A civil site checking whether a subgrade is within tolerance of the design before the surfacing crew arrivesnot Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- A mine that wants weekly volume reporting without a survey crew on the ground every weeknot Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- The rename from ContextCapture is more than cosmetic: licensing moved into Bentley's subscription and consumption model, and existing perpetual users should confirm what a renewal converts to before assuming continuity of cost.
- Consumption-based entitlements make the cost of a large reconstruction hard to predict in advance, which is awkward when you are quoting a fixed-price deliverable to a client.
- The desktop engine is Windows only and reconstruction is compute-hungry, so meaningful throughput needs either serious workstation hardware or paid cloud processing.
- Bentley does not publish a plain rate card and pricing varies by region, reseller and existing agreement, so two firms buying the same thing can pay very different amounts.
- Value compounds inside the Bentley ecosystem, and a firm whose design work happens in Autodesk or Esri tools pays for a positioning it will not use while getting the same mesh a cheaper standalone photogrammetry package would produce.
Propeller Aero
- Platform pricing is not published and is scoped by sites and users, so a contractor with many short-lived sites can be quoted very differently from one with a few long ones, and neither can benchmark against a list price
- The corrections network is free only while you hold a current platform licence, so cancelling the platform subscription reintroduces a 1,000 dollar per year per group hardware cost that many buyers do not model
- AeroPoints are a hardware purchase at 1,000 dollars each and most sites need several, so the true entry cost includes several thousand dollars of equipment on top of a subscription
- It measures rather than designs, so a contractor still needs Civil 3D, Trimble Business Center or an equivalent to produce and revise the design surfaces the measurement is compared against
- Accuracy depends on flight planning, ground control placement and weather, and a poorly flown survey produces a confident wrong volume, so an organisation still needs someone who understands survey error rather than only a drone pilot
Pricing, plan by plan
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
On request- iTwin Capture Modeler$undefined/year
- Subscription entitlement through Bentley licensing
- Consumption charged against Bentley Keys on some agreements
- Reality Modeling WorkSuite bundles Modeler with reality data management
Propeller Aero
On request- AeroPoint ground control unit$1000/one-time
- Single solar-powered GNSS ground control marker
- Includes 12 months of the Propeller Corrections Network
- Network renewal 1,000 USD per year per AeroPoint group
- Propeller Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by number of sites, users and survey volume
- Not published
- Processing turnaround and support level vary by agreement
Which should you pick?
Choose Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler if
- You need aerial triangulation.
- You work on Windows, Cloud.
- You also want dense mesh reconstruction.
Choose Propeller Aero if
- You need photogrammetric processing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want aeropoints ground control.
Questions people ask
- Is Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler or Propeller Aero better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler starts at On request and Propeller Aero at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler or Propeller Aero?
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler starts at On request and Propeller Aero at On request.
- Does Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler or Propeller Aero run on more platforms?
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler runs on Windows, Cloud. Propeller Aero runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler best used for?
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler is most often used for a highway authority reconstructing a corridor from drone imagery for design work in openroads, a survey firm delivering city-scale textured meshes to a municipal client for planning and visualisation, an engineering consultancy fusing terrestrial laser scans with drone photography of a bridge for condition assessment, a team publishing streamable 3d tiles of a construction site so stakeholders can view it in a browser. Of those, a highway authority reconstructing a corridor from drone imagery for design work in openroads and a survey firm delivering city-scale textured meshes to a municipal client for planning and visualisation are not what Propeller Aero is typically brought in for.
- What can Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler do that Propeller Aero cannot?
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler covers Aerial triangulation, Dense mesh reconstruction, Point cloud fusion, Orthophoto and DSM output. Propeller Aero covers Photogrammetric processing, AeroPoints ground control, Volume measurement, Design surface comparison.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler: Is ContextCapture discontinued?
The name is. The product continues as iTwin Capture Modeler within Bentley's iTwin family.
Propeller Aero: How much does Propeller cost?
The platform is quoted and not published. AeroPoints are 1,000 US dollars each, with the corrections network included for twelve months and thereafter free while a platform licence is current, otherwise 1,000 dollars a year per group.
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler: Does it still support a perpetual licence?
New buyers should expect subscription or consumption-based entitlements. Confirm the exact conversion path if you hold an older perpetual licence.
Propeller Aero: Do I need AeroPoints?
No, you can use conventional surveyed ground control, but the AeroPoints workflow is the main reason contractors choose Propeller over generic photogrammetry.
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler: Can it process laser scan data as well as photographs?
Yes. It fuses point clouds with imagery in a single reconstruction.
Propeller Aero: Is it survey grade?
Propeller states centimetre-level accuracy with correct ground control. Whether that satisfies a contract depends on your specification and on how the survey was flown, not on the software alone.
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler: Do I need other Bentley software to use it?
No, output formats are usable elsewhere, but the commercial and workflow case is strongest if you already run MicroStation or OpenRoads.
Propeller Aero: Who owns the data?
You retain your survey data and can export surfaces and point clouds, but check the export formats and retention terms in your contract before closeout, because bulk historical export is not a self-service one-click operation.
Related pages
More on Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
More on Propeller Aero
Other head to heads
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs RealityScan
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Carlson Software
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs ANSYS Fluent
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs FreeCAD
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Altium 365
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs CloudCompare
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs KiCad
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Nomad Sculpt
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Zoo
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Enscape
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Siemens NX
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Shapr3D
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Houdini
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs ZBrush
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Arnold
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Inventor
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Trimble
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Reconstruct
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Sitemark
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Handoff
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs RIB CostX
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Buildots
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs HammerTech
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Kojo
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Topcon MAGNET
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Smartsheet Construction
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Adaptive
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs ALICE Technologies
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs B2W Estimate
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Trimble Pay
- Propeller Aero vs RealityScan
- Propeller Aero vs Carlson Software
- Propeller Aero vs ANSYS Fluent
- Propeller Aero vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Propeller Aero vs FreeCAD
- Propeller Aero vs Altium 365
- Propeller Aero vs CloudCompare
- Propeller Aero vs KiCad
- Propeller Aero vs Nomad Sculpt
- Propeller Aero vs Zoo
- Propeller Aero vs Enscape
- Propeller Aero vs Siemens NX
- Propeller Aero vs Shapr3D
- Propeller Aero vs Houdini
- Propeller Aero vs ZBrush
- Propeller Aero vs Arnold
- Propeller Aero vs Inventor
- Propeller Aero vs Trimble
- Propeller Aero vs Reconstruct
- Propeller Aero vs Sitemark
- Propeller Aero vs Handoff
- Propeller Aero vs RIB CostX
- Propeller Aero vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Propeller Aero vs Buildots
- Propeller Aero vs HammerTech
- Propeller Aero vs Kojo
- Propeller Aero vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Propeller Aero vs Topcon MAGNET
- Propeller Aero vs Smartsheet Construction
- Propeller Aero vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Propeller Aero vs Adaptive
- Propeller Aero vs ALICE Technologies
- Propeller Aero vs B2W Estimate
- Propeller Aero vs Trimble Pay
