Cloud · head to head
Beam Cloud vs Spacelift

Beam Cloud
Cloud
Serverless GPU computing with sub-second cold starts and multi-cloud support
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Spacelift
Developer Tools
Infrastructure-as-code orchestration for Terraform, OpenTofu, Pulumi and Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Beam Cloud free tier limited to $30 monthly credits with 5 GPU containers; Spacelift users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast.
- They diverge on capability: Beam Cloud covers Sub-second cold starts, Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Beam Cloud and Spacelift actually diverge.
| Attribute | Beam Cloud | Spacelift |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium with pay-per-millisecond usage charges | By private worker and tier, not by user |
| Platforms | Cloud, Python | Web, Self-hosted, Cloud |
| Category | Cloud | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Beam Cloud
- Sub-second cold starts
- Inference endpoints
- Task queues
- Sandboxes
- Multi-cloud support
- Python SDK
- Global distribution
- Massive parallelization
Only in Spacelift
- Multi-tool orchestration
- Policy as code
- Private workers
- Spaces
- Blueprints
- Drift detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Beam Cloud
- Deploying ML models with minimal latency and setup timenot Spacelift
- Large-scale batch processing across thousands of concurrent tasksnot Spacelift
- Cost-effective inference serving with bursty workloadsnot Spacelift
- Multi-cloud AI deployments with global low-latency accessnot Spacelift
- Serverless AI development for rapid experimentationnot Spacelift
Spacelift
- Platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application CInot Beam Cloud
- Organisations standardising Terraform and OpenTofu across many teams with policy enforcementnot Beam Cloud
- Estates needing private runners so cloud credentials never leave the networknot Beam Cloud
- Teams wanting drift detection and reconciliation rather than plan-time checks alonenot Beam Cloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Beam Cloud
- Free tier limited to $30 monthly credits with 5 GPU containers
- Massive parallelization complexity may require DevOps expertise
- Per-millisecond pricing model requires careful cost monitoring
- Smaller team relative to established cloud providers
Spacelift
- Users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast.
- There is no affordable paid entry point. The free tier stops at two users and the next tier is a five-figure commitment with nothing in between.
- Three of the five tiers are quote-only, so a shortlist cannot be costed without entering a sales process with each vendor on it.
- The self-hosted build lags the hosted one, has no public worker pool and lacks the Azure and Google Cloud integrations available in the SaaS product, with OIDC federation offered as the workaround.
- Stacks, Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and Spacelift-managed state are proprietary constructs, so leaving means rebuilding the orchestration layer rather than pointing it at a different runner.
Pricing, plan by plan
Beam Cloud
Free- DeveloperFree
- $30 monthly free credits
- 5 GPU containers, 30 CPU containers
- Community support
- Team$89/month
- $30 monthly free credits included
- 50 GPU containers, 1,000 CPU containers
- 3 seats included, $25 per additional
- Growth$undefined/custom
- 1,000+ GPU containers
- Unlimited CPU containers
- Unlimited seats
- Serverless GPUs$undefined/per-millisecond
- RTX 4090: $0.00019/sec
Spacelift
Free- FreeFree
- Two users
- Public workers only
- No private workers
- Starter Plus$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Two public workers
- One to two private workers
- Business$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Three private workers
- Quoted
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Five to thirty private workers
- Self-hosted option
Which should you pick?
Choose Beam Cloud if
- You need sub-second cold starts.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Python.
- You also want inference endpoints.
Choose Spacelift if
- You need multi-tool orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- You also want policy as code.
Questions people ask
- Is Beam Cloud or Spacelift better?
- Neither clearly leads. Beam Cloud starts at Free and Spacelift at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Beam Cloud or Spacelift?
- Beam Cloud starts at Free and Spacelift at Free.
- Does Beam Cloud or Spacelift run on more platforms?
- Beam Cloud runs on Cloud, Python. Spacelift runs on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- Can I use Beam Cloud for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Beam Cloud best used for?
- Beam Cloud is most often used for deploying ml models with minimal latency and setup time, large-scale batch processing across thousands of concurrent tasks, cost-effective inference serving with bursty workloads, multi-cloud ai deployments with global low-latency access. Of those, deploying ml models with minimal latency and setup time and large-scale batch processing across thousands of concurrent tasks are not what Spacelift is typically brought in for.
- What can Beam Cloud do that Spacelift cannot?
- Beam Cloud covers Sub-second cold starts, Inference endpoints, Task queues, Sandboxes. Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration, Policy as code, Private workers, Spaces.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Beam Cloud: What is included in the Developer plan?
The Developer plan includes $30 monthly free credits, 5 GPU containers, 30 CPU containers, and community support. No upfront commitment is required.
SourceSpacelift: How is Spacelift priced?
By tier and by private worker count rather than per user. Users are unlimited on every paid plan. The published figure on the pricing page carries no period label, and the FAQ describes the tier as an annual subscription, so confirm the period in writing.
Beam Cloud: How fast are the cold starts?
Beam Cloud achieves sub-second cold starts through memory snapshots that restore GPU containers 35x faster than traditional cold boots.
SourceSpacelift: Does it support OpenTofu?
Yes, and Spacelift sponsors the OpenTofu project, which is a substantive hedge for anyone avoiding Terraform under the Business Source Licence.
Beam Cloud: Can I deploy across multiple cloud providers?
Yes, Beam Cloud supports multi-cloud deployment across AWS, GCP, Azure, Hetzner, and other providers with 30+ global regions available.
SourceSpacelift: Is there a self-hosted version?
Yes, described as carrying Enterprise functionality, but it is priced on request and lags the hosted product on cloud integrations.
Spacelift: Why not just use the CI system we already have?
That is the real comparison. General purpose CI handles state, drift, approval gates and concurrency control for infrastructure poorly, and whether that is worth a five-figure floor depends on how much infrastructure change your organisation actually ships.
Spacelift: What happens to our pipelines if we leave?
They do not port. Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and managed state are Spacelift constructs and the orchestration has to be rebuilt elsewhere.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Beam Cloud vs Cerebrium
- Beam Cloud vs Lambda
- Beam Cloud vs Upstash
- Beam Cloud vs Neon
- Beam Cloud vs Koyeb
- Beam Cloud vs Fly.io
- Beam Cloud vs Rancher
- Beam Cloud vs Deno Deploy
- Beam Cloud vs Serverless Framework
- Beam Cloud vs Render
- Beam Cloud vs Railway
- Beam Cloud vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Beam Cloud vs Contabo
- Beam Cloud vs containerd
- Beam Cloud vs Coolify
- Beam Cloud vs Crossplane
- Beam Cloud vs Dokku
- Beam Cloud vs Encore
- Beam Cloud vs Atlantis
- Beam Cloud vs Earthly
- Beam Cloud vs Harness
- Beam Cloud vs Cortex
- Beam Cloud vs OpsLevel
- Beam Cloud vs Backstage
- Beam Cloud vs Okteto
- Beam Cloud vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Beam Cloud vs HCP Terraform
- Beam Cloud vs Azure DevOps
- Beam Cloud vs ConfigCat
- Beam Cloud vs Frappe
- Beam Cloud vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Beam Cloud vs Cody
- Beam Cloud vs Dagger
- Beam Cloud vs Deep Code
- Spacelift vs Cerebrium
- Spacelift vs Lambda
- Spacelift vs Upstash
- Spacelift vs Neon
- Spacelift vs Koyeb
- Spacelift vs Fly.io
- Spacelift vs Rancher
- Spacelift vs Deno Deploy
- Spacelift vs Serverless Framework
- Spacelift vs Render
- Spacelift vs Railway
- Spacelift vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Spacelift vs Contabo
- Spacelift vs containerd
- Spacelift vs Coolify
- Spacelift vs Crossplane
- Spacelift vs Dokku
- Spacelift vs Encore
- Spacelift vs Atlantis
- Spacelift vs Earthly
- Spacelift vs Harness
- Spacelift vs Cortex
- Spacelift vs OpsLevel
- Spacelift vs Backstage
- Spacelift vs Okteto
- Spacelift vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Spacelift vs HCP Terraform
- Spacelift vs Azure DevOps
- Spacelift vs ConfigCat
- Spacelift vs Frappe
- Spacelift vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Spacelift vs Cody
- Spacelift vs Dagger
- Spacelift vs Deep Code
