Cloud · head to head
Beam Cloud vs Cody

Beam Cloud
Cloud
Serverless GPU computing with sub-second cold starts and multi-cloud support
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Beam Cloud free tier limited to $30 monthly credits with 5 GPU containers; Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Beam Cloud and Cody actually diverge.
| Attribute | Beam Cloud | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium with pay-per-millisecond usage charges | freemium |
| Platforms | Cloud, Python | Web |
| Category | Cloud | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Beam Cloud
- Sub-second cold starts
- Inference endpoints
- Task queues
- Sandboxes
- Multi-cloud support
- Python SDK
- Global distribution
- Massive parallelization
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Beam Cloud does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Beam Cloud
- Deploying ML models with minimal latency and setup timenot Cody
- Large-scale batch processing across thousands of concurrent tasksnot Cody
- Cost-effective inference serving with bursty workloadsnot Cody
- Multi-cloud AI deployments with global low-latency accessnot Cody
- Serverless AI development for rapid experimentationnot Cody
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Beam Cloud
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Beam Cloud
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Beam Cloud
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Beam Cloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Beam Cloud
- Free tier limited to $30 monthly credits with 5 GPU containers
- Massive parallelization complexity may require DevOps expertise
- Per-millisecond pricing model requires careful cost monitoring
- Smaller team relative to established cloud providers
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Pricing, plan by plan
Beam Cloud
Free- DeveloperFree
- $30 monthly free credits
- 5 GPU containers, 30 CPU containers
- Community support
- Team$89/month
- $30 monthly free credits included
- 50 GPU containers, 1,000 CPU containers
- 3 seats included, $25 per additional
- Growth$undefined/custom
- 1,000+ GPU containers
- Unlimited CPU containers
- Unlimited seats
- Serverless GPUs$undefined/per-millisecond
- RTX 4090: $0.00019/sec
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Beam Cloud if
- You need sub-second cold starts.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Python.
- You also want inference endpoints.
Questions people ask
- Is Beam Cloud or Cody better?
- Neither clearly leads. Beam Cloud starts at Free and Cody at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Beam Cloud or Cody?
- Beam Cloud starts at Free and Cody at Free.
- Does Beam Cloud or Cody run on more platforms?
- Beam Cloud runs on Cloud, Python. Cody runs on Web.
- Can I use Beam Cloud for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Beam Cloud best used for?
- Beam Cloud is most often used for deploying ml models with minimal latency and setup time, large-scale batch processing across thousands of concurrent tasks, cost-effective inference serving with bursty workloads, multi-cloud ai deployments with global low-latency access. Of those, deploying ml models with minimal latency and setup time and large-scale batch processing across thousands of concurrent tasks are not what Cody is typically brought in for.
- What can Beam Cloud do that Cody cannot?
- Beam Cloud covers Sub-second cold starts, Inference endpoints, Task queues, Sandboxes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Beam Cloud: What is included in the Developer plan?
The Developer plan includes $30 monthly free credits, 5 GPU containers, 30 CPU containers, and community support. No upfront commitment is required.
SourceCody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceBeam Cloud: How fast are the cold starts?
Beam Cloud achieves sub-second cold starts through memory snapshots that restore GPU containers 35x faster than traditional cold boots.
SourceCody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceBeam Cloud: Can I deploy across multiple cloud providers?
Yes, Beam Cloud supports multi-cloud deployment across AWS, GCP, Azure, Hetzner, and other providers with 30+ global regions available.
SourceCody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Beam Cloud vs Cerebrium
- Beam Cloud vs Lambda
- Beam Cloud vs Upstash
- Beam Cloud vs Neon
- Beam Cloud vs Koyeb
- Beam Cloud vs Fly.io
- Beam Cloud vs Rancher
- Beam Cloud vs Deno Deploy
- Beam Cloud vs Serverless Framework
- Beam Cloud vs Render
- Beam Cloud vs Railway
- Beam Cloud vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Beam Cloud vs Contabo
- Beam Cloud vs containerd
- Beam Cloud vs Coolify
- Beam Cloud vs Crossplane
- Beam Cloud vs Dokku
- Beam Cloud vs Encore
- Beam Cloud vs Turborepo
- Beam Cloud vs Visual Studio Code
- Beam Cloud vs ESLint
- Beam Cloud vs pnpm
- Beam Cloud vs Sourcegraph
- Beam Cloud vs Sweep
- Beam Cloud vs Deep Code
- Beam Cloud vs GitHub Copilot
- Beam Cloud vs Bazel
- Beam Cloud vs Fig
- Beam Cloud vs GoLand
- Beam Cloud vs Steampipe
- Beam Cloud vs Tilt
- Beam Cloud vs WarpBuild
- Beam Cloud vs Webpack
- Beam Cloud vs Avo
- Beam Cloud vs Azure DevOps
- Beam Cloud vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs Cerebrium
- Cody vs Lambda
- Cody vs Upstash
- Cody vs Neon
- Cody vs Koyeb
- Cody vs Fly.io
- Cody vs Rancher
- Cody vs Deno Deploy
- Cody vs Serverless Framework
- Cody vs Render
- Cody vs Railway
- Cody vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Cody vs Contabo
- Cody vs containerd
- Cody vs Coolify
- Cody vs Crossplane
- Cody vs Dokku
- Cody vs Encore
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs Deep Code
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Steampipe
- Cody vs Tilt
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Webpack
- Cody vs Avo
- Cody vs Azure DevOps
- Cody vs PhpStorm

