Software Development · head to head
Baseten vs Devin

Devin
Software Development
Autonomous AI software engineer planning and executing code in its own environment
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Baseten has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Baseten pro and Enterprise pricing not published; requires contacting sales; Devin pricing not published; specific costs and plan tiers require signup or contact with sales
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Baseten and Devin actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Software Development).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Baseten
- Custom model deploymentnot Devin
- Fine-tuned LLM hostingnot Devin
- Inference API scalingnot Devin
Devin
- Feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebasesnot Baseten
- Code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositoriesnot Baseten
- Bug fixing and debugging with test-driven verificationnot Baseten
- Rapid prototyping and proof-of-concept developmentnot Baseten
- Repetitive implementation tasks freeing human engineers for complex designnot Baseten
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Baseten
- Pro and Enterprise pricing not published; requires contacting sales
- Pricing varies significantly by compute type and model
Devin
- Pricing not published; specific costs and plan tiers require signup or contact with sales
- Cannot handle extremely difficult tasks reliably; success rate decreases with task complexity
- Requires clear, well-scoped task descriptions; ambiguous requirements reduce effectiveness
- Requires human oversight and integration into existing workflows; not fully autonomous
Pricing, plan by plan
Baseten
Free- BasicFree
- Pay-as-you-go deployments
- Dedicated model APIs
- SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance
- Pro$null/month
- Priority GPU access
- Unlimited autoscaling
- Volume discounts available
- Enterprise$null/month
- Self-hosted options
- Custom SLAs
- Data residency control
Devin
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Devin review.
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Baseten or Devin better?
- Neither clearly leads. Baseten starts at Free and Devin at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Baseten or Devin?
- Baseten has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Baseten and On request for Devin.
- Does Baseten or Devin run on more platforms?
- Baseten runs on Web. Devin runs on Desktop, Windsurf integration, Web.
- Can I use Baseten for free?
- Yes. Baseten has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Devin starts at On request.
- What is Baseten best used for?
- Baseten is most often used for custom model deployment, fine-tuned llm hosting, inference api scaling. Of those, custom model deployment and fine-tuned llm hosting are not what Devin is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Baseten: Does Baseten have a free tier?
Yes, Baseten's Basic plan is free with a pay-as-you-go model for dedicated deployments and model APIs.
SourceDevin: What does Devin cost?
Devin's pricing is not publicly listed on their website. Interested parties must request a demo to discuss pricing and availability.
SourceBaseten: How are GPU instances priced on Baseten?
GPU instances are priced per minute: T4 at $0.01052/min, H100 at $0.10833/min, and B200 at $0.16633/min. CPU instances range from $0.00058 to $0.01382 per minute.
SourceDevin: How do I get access to Devin?
Devin is accessed by requesting a demo. There is no information about self-service signup, trial, or pricing on the public website.
SourceBaseten: What are Model API costs on Baseten?
Model API pricing varies by model: DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.028 per million output tokens; GLM-5.3-Flash costs $0.15 and $0.03 respectively.
SourceBaseten: Does Baseten charge for idle compute time?
No, Baseten does not charge for idle time; billing only covers active compute usage on deployments.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Baseten vs Cursor
- Baseten vs Windsurf
- Baseten vs Zed
- Baseten vs Amp
- Baseten vs Augment Code
- Baseten vs TeamCity
- Baseten vs Flagsmith
- Baseten vs Unleash
- Baseten vs Braintrust
- Baseten vs Codacy
- Baseten vs DeepSource
- Baseten vs Langfuse
- Baseten vs LangSmith
- Baseten vs Qodo
- Baseten vs Val Town
- Baseten vs Cline
- Baseten vs Factory
- Baseten vs Humanloop
- Baseten vs Drizzle ORM
- Baseten vs Skaffold
- Baseten vs Bun
- Devin vs Cursor
- Devin vs Windsurf
- Devin vs Zed
- Devin vs Amp
- Devin vs Augment Code
- Devin vs TeamCity
- Devin vs Flagsmith
- Devin vs Unleash
- Devin vs Braintrust
- Devin vs Codacy
- Devin vs DeepSource
- Devin vs Langfuse
- Devin vs LangSmith
- Devin vs Qodo
- Devin vs Val Town
- Devin vs Cline
- Devin vs Factory
- Devin vs Humanloop
- Devin vs Drizzle ORM
- Devin vs Skaffold
- Devin vs Bun

