Cybersecurity · head to head
Baffle vs Rhombus Systems

Baffle
Cybersecurity
Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Rhombus Systems
Cybersecurity
Cloud-managed cameras, sensors and access control with a per-camera annual licence
- From
- $149/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Baffle the proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.; Rhombus Systems the per-camera annual licence never ends and a camera without an active licence stops working, so the total cost over a ten-year hardware life is several times the hardware price.
- They diverge on capability: Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Rhombus Systems covers On-camera storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Baffle and Rhombus Systems actually diverge.
| Attribute | Baffle | Rhombus Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $149/year |
| Pricing model | quote | Per camera per year licence plus hardware |
| Platforms | Linux, Web | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Baffle
- Transparent proxy deployment
- Field-level encryption
- Tokenisation
- Format-preserving de-identification
- Dynamic data masking
- Bring your own key
- Analytics and pipeline support
- AI pipeline protection
Only in Rhombus Systems
- On-camera storage
- No NVR or server
- AI search
- Access control
- Environmental sensors
- Unlimited users
- Ten year hardware warranty
- Optional cloud archiving
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Baffle
- A bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account datanot Rhombus Systems
- A company wanting to take a reporting database out of PCI scope by tokenising card fields before they landnot Rhombus Systems
- A healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administernot Rhombus Systems
- A team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an AI retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobsnot Rhombus Systems
Rhombus Systems
- A school district running video across dozens of buildings with no local IT at each sitenot Baffle
- A clinic group needing door access and cameras in one console under a single audit trailnot Baffle
- A logistics operator that wants to search for a specific vehicle across sites without scrubbing footagenot Baffle
- An office estate replacing ageing NVRs where nobody remains who knows how to maintain themnot Baffle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Baffle
- The proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.
- What you can still do in SQL depends on the protection mode chosen, and stronger modes restrict comparisons, joins and aggregations on protected columns, which can quietly break existing reports and analytics.
- Database and driver coverage is finite, so an organisation with an unusual engine, an old driver or heavy use of stored procedures may find its most important system is exactly the one not supported.
- Pricing is unpublished and scales with protected data stores, which means an enterprise trying to protect a long tail of small databases pays disproportionately compared with protecting a handful of large ones.
- Key management is your responsibility under bring your own key, and while that is the correct security posture, it moves a real operational burden and a genuine data-loss risk onto the customer.
Rhombus Systems
- The per-camera annual licence never ends and a camera without an active licence stops working, so the total cost over a ten-year hardware life is several times the hardware price.
- Cameras must be Rhombus, so there is no reuse of existing IP cameras and migrating away means replacing every device rather than changing software.
- Cloud archiving is priced separately by retention and stream count, and long retention on multisensor cameras runs into five figures per camera, which can dwarf everything else in the quote.
- On-camera storage is the default retention, so a camera physically stolen or destroyed takes its unarchived footage with it unless cloud archiving was paid for on that camera.
- Analytics and integrations are good for mid-market needs but shallower than a dedicated enterprise VMS with a large third-party ecosystem, so specialist requirements like advanced LPR or forensic search hit limits.
Pricing, plan by plan
Baffle
On request- Baffle Data Protection Services$undefined/year
- Quoted by protected data stores and deployment scale
- Self-managed and cloud marketplace deployment options
- Annual subscription
Rhombus Systems
$149/year- Professional$149/year
- Per camera per year
- Cloud console and management
- On-camera storage retention
- Enterprise$199/year
- Per camera per year
- Everything in Professional
- Flexible cloud archiving options
- Cloud archiving$undefined/year
- Priced separately by retention period and stream count
- Multisensor cameras cost several times a single sensor camera
- Long retention on multisensor models can reach five figures per camera
Which should you pick?
Choose Baffle if
- You need transparent proxy deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want field-level encryption.
Choose Rhombus Systems if
- You need on-camera storage.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no nvr or server.
Questions people ask
- Is Baffle or Rhombus Systems better?
- Neither clearly leads. Baffle starts at On request and Rhombus Systems at $149/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Baffle or Rhombus Systems?
- Baffle starts at On request and Rhombus Systems at $149/year.
- Does Baffle or Rhombus Systems run on more platforms?
- Baffle runs on Linux, Web. Rhombus Systems runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Baffle best used for?
- Baffle is most often used for a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data, a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land, a healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administer, a team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an ai retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobs. Of those, a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data and a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land are not what Rhombus Systems is typically brought in for.
- What can Baffle do that Rhombus Systems cannot?
- Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Field-level encryption, Tokenisation, Format-preserving de-identification. Rhombus Systems covers On-camera storage, No NVR or server, AI search, Access control.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Baffle: Do applications need code changes?
No. That is the central design choice. Baffle intercepts traffic as a proxy rather than requiring an SDK call at every read and write.
Rhombus Systems: Do I need an NVR or a server?
No. Cameras record on board and connect directly to the cloud console, which is the main operational reason organisations pick it.
Baffle: Can you still query encrypted columns?
Partly, and it depends on the protection mode. Some modes preserve equality matching and format, stronger modes restrict what SQL operations remain possible, so this must be tested against your actual queries.
Rhombus Systems: What does the licence cost?
Roughly $149 per camera per year for Professional and about $199 for Enterprise, typically sold in one, three, five or ten year terms.
Baffle: Does it take systems out of PCI scope?
Tokenisation can reduce scope by ensuring card data never lands in the protected system, but scope reduction is an assessor judgement, not a product setting.
Rhombus Systems: Is cloud storage included?
No. On-camera storage is the default. Cloud archiving is a separate charge priced by retention duration and number of streams.
Baffle: Who holds the encryption keys?
You do, through your own key management service. Baffle supports bring your own key rather than holding customer keys itself.
Rhombus Systems: Can I use my existing cameras?
No. The platform works only with Rhombus hardware, which is the trade-off for the zero-server architecture.
Related pages
More on Rhombus Systems
Other head to heads
- Baffle vs Very Good Security
- Baffle vs HashiCorp Vault
- Baffle vs 1Password
- Baffle vs LastPass
- Baffle vs Mullvad VPN
- Baffle vs Private Internet Access
- Baffle vs IVPN
- Baffle vs TunnelBear
- Baffle vs Enpass
- Baffle vs Passbolt
- Baffle vs Feedzai
- Baffle vs Genetec Security Center
- Baffle vs Tenable Nessus
- Baffle vs Transmit Security
- Baffle vs TrustArc
- Baffle vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Baffle vs VMware Carbon Black
- Baffle vs Wireshark
- Baffle vs Spot AI
- Baffle vs Salient CompleteView
- Baffle vs Milestone XProtect
- Baffle vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Baffle vs DTiQ
- Baffle vs Motorola Vigilant
- Baffle vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Baffle vs Camio
- Baffle vs Dahua Technology
- Baffle vs March Networks
- Baffle vs Envysion
- Baffle vs Avast One
- Baffle vs Chainguard
- Baffle vs Cosign
- Baffle vs CyberGhost VPN
- Baffle vs Descope
- Rhombus Systems vs Very Good Security
- Rhombus Systems vs HashiCorp Vault
- Rhombus Systems vs 1Password
- Rhombus Systems vs LastPass
- Rhombus Systems vs Mullvad VPN
- Rhombus Systems vs Private Internet Access
- Rhombus Systems vs IVPN
- Rhombus Systems vs TunnelBear
- Rhombus Systems vs Enpass
- Rhombus Systems vs Passbolt
- Rhombus Systems vs Feedzai
- Rhombus Systems vs Genetec Security Center
- Rhombus Systems vs Tenable Nessus
- Rhombus Systems vs Transmit Security
- Rhombus Systems vs TrustArc
- Rhombus Systems vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Rhombus Systems vs VMware Carbon Black
- Rhombus Systems vs Wireshark
- Rhombus Systems vs Spot AI
- Rhombus Systems vs Salient CompleteView
- Rhombus Systems vs Milestone XProtect
- Rhombus Systems vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Rhombus Systems vs DTiQ
- Rhombus Systems vs Motorola Vigilant
- Rhombus Systems vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Rhombus Systems vs Camio
- Rhombus Systems vs Dahua Technology
- Rhombus Systems vs March Networks
- Rhombus Systems vs Envysion
- Rhombus Systems vs Avast One
- Rhombus Systems vs Chainguard
- Rhombus Systems vs Cosign
- Rhombus Systems vs CyberGhost VPN
- Rhombus Systems vs Descope
