ERP · head to head
Axonaut vs Ivalua

Axonaut
ERP
All-in-one French management platform for invoicing, CRM, accounting and HR
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Ivalua
ERP
Source-to-pay on one codebase and one data model, sold to large enterprises by module
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Axonaut base price of EUR 38/month covers only 1 user; every additional user costs EUR 29.99/month more, so team pricing scales linearly with no volume discount tier shown; Ivalua entry deployments are reported around 150,000 US dollars a year before implementation, which puts it entirely out of reach for mid-market procurement teams.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Axonaut and Ivalua actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Axonaut
Nothing recorded that Ivalua does not also cover.
Only in Ivalua
- Single data model
- Supplier risk and onboarding
- Contract lifecycle management
- Direct materials procurement
- Invoice matching and payment
- Configurable workflow engine
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Axonaut
- Creating and sending invoices with automated payment collectionnot Ivalua
- Centralizing customer contacts and tracking sales opportunitiesnot Ivalua
- Managing project profitability through team time trackingnot Ivalua
- Automating leave management and HR functions for teamsnot Ivalua
- Connecting to Shopify and WooCommerce for integrated operationsnot Ivalua
Ivalua
- A manufacturer that needs direct materials sourcing tied to a bill of materials, not just indirect spendnot Axonaut
- An enterprise whose last procurement programme failed because supplier master data could not be reconciled across modulesnot Axonaut
- A regulated organisation needing third-party risk screening enforced before a supplier can receive a purchase ordernot Axonaut
- Replacing separate sourcing, contract and invoice systems where each holds a different version of the supplier recordnot Axonaut
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Axonaut
- Base price of EUR 38/month covers only 1 user; every additional user costs EUR 29.99/month more, so team pricing scales linearly with no volume discount tier shown
- Discounted monthly rates require paying 1, 2 or 3 years upfront in full rather than a recurring discount on monthly billing
Ivalua
- Entry deployments are reported around 150,000 US dollars a year before implementation, which puts it entirely out of reach for mid-market procurement teams.
- Configurability requires an internal product owner and usually a systems integrator, so the total programme cost is a multiple of the licence and the failure modes are those of an ERP project.
- Module-based licensing means capability you assumed was included, such as contract lifecycle management or supplier risk, is frequently a separate line item discovered late in the negotiation.
- Supplier network pricing scales with active supplier count, so an organisation with a long tail of small suppliers pays for records that generate little spend.
- The user interface prioritises configurability over ease, and casual requisitioners across the business need more guidance than a consumer-style intake tool would require.
Pricing, plan by plan
Axonaut
On request- Monthly$undefined/month
- Annual$undefined/year
Ivalua
On request- Ivalua Source-to-Pay$undefined/year
- Module-based licensing rather than per seat
- User counts tiered by role category
- Supplier network pricing driven by active supplier count
Which should you pick?
Choose Axonaut if
Nothing in the data separates Axonaut from Ivalua on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Ivalua if
- You need single data model.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want supplier risk and onboarding.
Questions people ask
- Is Axonaut or Ivalua better?
- Neither clearly leads. Axonaut starts at On request and Ivalua at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Axonaut or Ivalua?
- Axonaut starts at On request and Ivalua at On request.
- Does Axonaut or Ivalua run on more platforms?
- Axonaut runs on Web. Ivalua runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Axonaut best used for?
- Axonaut is most often used for creating and sending invoices with automated payment collection, centralizing customer contacts and tracking sales opportunities, managing project profitability through team time tracking, automating leave management and hr functions for teams. Of those, creating and sending invoices with automated payment collection and centralizing customer contacts and tracking sales opportunities are not what Ivalua is typically brought in for.
- What can Axonaut do that Ivalua cannot?
- Ivalua covers Single data model, Supplier risk and onboarding, Contract lifecycle management, Direct materials procurement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Axonaut: Does Axonaut offer a free trial?
Axonaut offers a 15-day free trial with no long-term commitment required, allowing users to test the platform before purchasing.
SourceIvalua: What does the single codebase actually buy me?
One supplier and contract record used across every module, so there is no synchronisation layer to reconcile and no data drift between sourcing and invoicing.
Axonaut: What currencies does Axonaut accept for billing?
Axonaut displays pricing in EUR in the French interface, excluding VAT.
SourceIvalua: What does Ivalua cost?
It is not published. Third parties report entry deployments around 150,000 USD a year and full-platform deployments above 400,000, plus implementation.
Ivalua: Does it handle direct materials?
Yes, which distinguishes it from suites built primarily for indirect spend.
Ivalua: Is Ivalua still independent?
Yes. It is one of the few large source-to-pay vendors not owned by a bigger enterprise software group.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Axonaut vs DEAR Systems
- Axonaut vs Infor CloudSuite
- Axonaut vs Fishbowl
- Axonaut vs MRPeasy
- Axonaut vs bexio
- Axonaut vs Dolibarr
- Axonaut vs Holded
- Axonaut vs TallyPrime
- Axonaut vs Odoo
- Axonaut vs Jaggaer
- Axonaut vs Deltek
- Axonaut vs IFS Applications
- Axonaut vs Kingdee
- Axonaut vs Omie
- Axonaut vs Priority Software
- Axonaut vs Protean ERP
- Axonaut vs QAD ERP
- Axonaut vs GEP SMART
- Axonaut vs Levelpath
- Axonaut vs Zycus
- Axonaut vs Axelor
- Axonaut vs IFS Cloud
- Axonaut vs Epicor
- Axonaut vs IQMS
- Axonaut vs Omnea
- Axonaut vs Cegid
- Axonaut vs Tyler Enterprise ERP (Munis)
- Axonaut vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Axonaut vs Sage X3
- Axonaut vs SYSPRO
- Axonaut vs ADempiere
- Axonaut vs Apache OFBiz
- Axonaut vs Aptean
- Ivalua vs DEAR Systems
- Ivalua vs Infor CloudSuite
- Ivalua vs Fishbowl
- Ivalua vs MRPeasy
- Ivalua vs bexio
- Ivalua vs Dolibarr
- Ivalua vs Holded
- Ivalua vs TallyPrime
- Ivalua vs Odoo
- Ivalua vs Jaggaer
- Ivalua vs Deltek
- Ivalua vs IFS Applications
- Ivalua vs Kingdee
- Ivalua vs Omie
- Ivalua vs Priority Software
- Ivalua vs Protean ERP
- Ivalua vs QAD ERP
- Ivalua vs GEP SMART
- Ivalua vs Levelpath
- Ivalua vs Zycus
- Ivalua vs Axelor
- Ivalua vs IFS Cloud
- Ivalua vs Epicor
- Ivalua vs IQMS
- Ivalua vs Omnea
- Ivalua vs Cegid
- Ivalua vs Tyler Enterprise ERP (Munis)
- Ivalua vs QAD Adaptive ERP
- Ivalua vs Sage X3
- Ivalua vs SYSPRO
- Ivalua vs ADempiere
- Ivalua vs Apache OFBiz
- Ivalua vs Aptean
