ERP · head to head
Axelor vs Soketi

Axelor
ERP
French open source ERP and CRM with a low-code studio for changing the data model without forking
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Soketi
Developer Tools
Self-hosted, Pusher-compatible WebSockets server with a stalled maintenance record
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Axelor pro requires at least ten users and Enterprise at least twenty, so a six-person company either stays on unsupported Community or pays for seats it does not have.; Soketi maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- They diverge on capability: Axelor covers Axelor Studio, Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Axelor and Soketi actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Axelor
- Axelor Studio
- BPM engine
- CRM and sales
- Manufacturing
- Accounting
- E-invoicing
- Stock and logistics
- REST API
Only in Soketi
- Pusher protocol compatibility
- Presence and private channels
- Horizontal scaling
- App management backends
- Webhooks
- Prometheus metrics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Axelor
- A European SME that wants ERP on its own servers for data sovereignty rather than in a US cloudnot Soketi
- A company whose processes do not fit a standard ERP and that wants to model them in BPMN instead of paying for custom codenot Soketi
- A francophone business needing a French chart of accounts and local statutory reporting out of the boxnot Soketi
- A team validating an open source ERP on the free Community edition with the option to move the same database onto a commercial licence laternot Soketi
Soketi
- A Laravel application that already uses Echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime providernot Axelor
- Realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasonsnot Axelor
- A local or CI environment that needs a Pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid accountnot Axelor
- A high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure billnot Axelor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Axelor
- Pro requires at least ten users and Enterprise at least twenty, so a six-person company either stays on unsupported Community or pays for seats it does not have.
- Documentation, community answers and partner material are substantially richer in French than English, which slows adoption for anglophone teams and makes hiring implementers outside Europe difficult.
- The AGPL licence on Community obliges you to publish modifications if you offer the software as a network service, which is a genuine blocker for anyone planning to resell a hosted version.
- The implementation partner network is concentrated in France and neighbouring markets, so buyers elsewhere have few local firms to tender against and limited support timezone coverage.
- It is a smaller ecosystem than Odoo or ERPNext, so there is no large third-party app marketplace, and functionality the suite lacks has to be built rather than bought.
Soketi
- Maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- Dependency drift on Node and uWebSockets.js will eventually force you to fork or migrate, and that cost is unbudgeted at the point you adopt it.
- There is no commercial support to buy, so a production incident at three in the morning is entirely your problem with no escalation path.
- Scaling beyond a single node needs Redis and careful configuration, and getting presence channels correct across nodes is a genuine source of subtle bugs.
- It implements the Pusher protocol rather than tracking it, so any protocol feature Pusher adds later will not appear, and the compatibility guarantee slowly decays.
Pricing, plan by plan
Axelor
Free- CommunityFree
- AGPL licensed, self-hosted
- Essential ERP and CRM modules
- Forum and documentation support only
- Pro$35/month
- Minimum ten users
- Commercial licence covering all business modules
- E-invoicing included
- Enterprise$55/month
- Minimum twenty users
- Advanced BI and dedicated AI agents
- SSO and CAS authentication
Soketi
Free- SoketiFree
- MIT licensed
- Unlimited connections subject to your own hardware
- No vendor billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Axelor if
- You need axelor studio.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, iOS, Android.
- You also want bpm engine.
Choose Soketi if
- You need pusher protocol compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want presence and private channels.
Questions people ask
- Is Axelor or Soketi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Axelor starts at Free and Soketi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Axelor or Soketi?
- Axelor starts at Free and Soketi at Free.
- Does Axelor or Soketi run on more platforms?
- Axelor runs on Web, Linux, Docker, iOS, Android. Soketi runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Axelor for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Axelor best used for?
- Axelor is most often used for a european sme that wants erp on its own servers for data sovereignty rather than in a us cloud, a company whose processes do not fit a standard erp and that wants to model them in bpmn instead of paying for custom code, a francophone business needing a french chart of accounts and local statutory reporting out of the box, a team validating an open source erp on the free community edition with the option to move the same database onto a commercial licence later. Of those, a european sme that wants erp on its own servers for data sovereignty rather than in a us cloud and a company whose processes do not fit a standard erp and that wants to model them in bpmn instead of paying for custom code are not what Soketi is typically brought in for.
- What can Axelor do that Soketi cannot?
- Axelor covers Axelor Studio, BPM engine, CRM and sales, Manufacturing. Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Presence and private channels, Horizontal scaling, App management backends.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Axelor: Is Axelor really free?
The Community edition is genuinely AGPL open source with no licence fee, but it lacks several business modules and has no vendor support, and you carry all hosting and upgrade work.
Soketi: Is Soketi still maintained?
Barely. The maintainer has stated that available time is very limited and releases have been sparse; treat it as community-maintained.
Axelor: Can I upgrade from Community without losing data?
Yes, Axelor states that a Community deployment can move to Pro or Enterprise keeping its database and configuration, which is unusual among open core vendors.
Soketi: Do I need to change my client code?
No. Pusher client SDKs and Laravel Echo work by changing the host, port and credentials.
Axelor: Do I need Java developers?
Not for most changes. Studio handles entities, views and workflows as configuration. Deep integrations and new module logic still need Java skills.
Soketi: What does it cost?
Nothing in licence fees. It is MIT licensed; you pay for the server it runs on.
Axelor: Does it handle EU e-invoicing mandates?
E-invoicing is included on the paid editions, which is the main reason French customers move off Community as mandates come into force.
Soketi: What are people moving to?
Laravel Reverb for Laravel applications, and Sockudo, a Rust reimplementation, for others.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Axelor vs Odoo
- Axelor vs Apache OFBiz
- Axelor vs Dolibarr
- Axelor vs iDempiere
- Axelor vs ADempiere
- Axelor vs Tryton
- Axelor vs Ivalua
- Axelor vs Zycus
- Axelor vs Jaggaer
- Axelor vs OpenBravo
- Axelor vs Omnea
- Axelor vs SYSPRO
- Axelor vs Exact Online
- Axelor vs Focus Softnet
- Axelor vs Holded
- Axelor vs Icertis
- Axelor vs IFS
- Axelor vs PartyKit
- Axelor vs Penpot
- Axelor vs Atlantis
- Axelor vs Coder
- Axelor vs Backstage
- Axelor vs Visual Studio Code
- Axelor vs GNU Emacs
- Axelor vs Bazel
- Axelor vs Eclipse IDE
- Axelor vs Pants Build
- Axelor vs Swagger UI
- Axelor vs Ansible
- Axelor vs Cody
- Axelor vs ConfigCat
- Axelor vs Cortex
- Axelor vs Dagger
- Axelor vs Deno
- Axelor vs Fig
- Soketi vs Odoo
- Soketi vs Apache OFBiz
- Soketi vs Dolibarr
- Soketi vs iDempiere
- Soketi vs ADempiere
- Soketi vs Tryton
- Soketi vs Ivalua
- Soketi vs Zycus
- Soketi vs Jaggaer
- Soketi vs OpenBravo
- Soketi vs Omnea
- Soketi vs SYSPRO
- Soketi vs Exact Online
- Soketi vs Focus Softnet
- Soketi vs Holded
- Soketi vs Icertis
- Soketi vs IFS
- Soketi vs PartyKit
- Soketi vs Penpot
- Soketi vs Atlantis
- Soketi vs Coder
- Soketi vs Backstage
- Soketi vs Visual Studio Code
- Soketi vs GNU Emacs
- Soketi vs Bazel
- Soketi vs Eclipse IDE
- Soketi vs Pants Build
- Soketi vs Swagger UI
- Soketi vs Ansible
- Soketi vs Cody
- Soketi vs ConfigCat
- Soketi vs Cortex
- Soketi vs Dagger
- Soketi vs Deno
- Soketi vs Fig
