Autonoly vs Jenkins

By credits rather than per task. Free covers 1,000 credits a month, Starter is $29, Growth $59 and Pro $99, with Enterprise priced on application. Simple actions cost 1 to 3 credits and advanced AI operations 5 to 15.

When the build needs something hosted runners cannot give you: physical hardware, an air-gapped network, a node-locked commercial tool licence, or an unusual platform. If none of those apply, hosted CI is usually less work to own.

Yes. It includes 1,000 credits a month and three concurrent AI agent workflows, with community support. No card is required to start.

Not in the open source distribution, which runs a single active controller. High availability and active-active controllers are features of CloudBees' commercial products. Open source deployments mitigate it with fast restores and, sometimes, multiple independent controllers.

Autonoly notifies you and suggests optimisations rather than stopping outright: you can upgrade at any time, or have non-critical workflows paused automatically until the allowance resets.

This is the main operational risk. Many plugins have a single volunteer maintainer, and Jenkins publishes security advisories for unmaintained plugins where no fix exists. Auditing which plugins you depend on and who maintains them should be a periodic task, not a one-off.

Yes. Upgrades and downgrades take effect immediately and billing is prorated. Autonoly also offers 50% off paid plans for nonprofits.

For declarative pipelines you can go a long way without it. Anything involving shared libraries, conditional logic or custom steps is Groovy, and it runs in a sandboxed, transformed environment where standard Groovy idioms sometimes behave unexpectedly.

The software is free under the MIT licence. The cost is infrastructure and staff time to run controllers, agents and upgrades, plus a CloudBees subscription if you want high availability, support or centralised management of many controllers.