Is Autonoly or Flowable better?

Neither clearly leads. Autonoly starts at Free and Flowable at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Autonoly or Flowable?

Autonoly starts at Free and Flowable at Free.

Does Autonoly or Flowable run on more platforms?

Autonoly runs on web, api. Flowable runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.

Can I use Autonoly for free?

Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.

What is Autonoly best used for?

Autonoly is most often used for scraping data from websites into spreadsheets or dashboards, generating scheduled excel and pdf reports automatically, chaining multi-step workflows across business apps, running python scripts and lightweight ml pipelines on a schedule. Of those, scraping data from websites into spreadsheets or dashboards and generating scheduled excel and pdf reports automatically are not what Flowable is typically brought in for.

What can Autonoly do that Flowable cannot?

Autonoly covers Natural language workflow builder, Web scraping, Reports and dashboards, Python and code execution. Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, CMMN case management, DMN decision tables, Spring Boot integration.

Automation Integration · head to head

Autonoly vs Flowable

Autonoly

Automation Integration

AI agents that build and run automation workflows from plain-English prompts

From: Free
Rated: -

Full review Website

Flowable

Automation Integration

Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti

From: Free
Rated: -

Full review Website

The short version

Each has a real cost: Autonoly pricing is credit-based, so heavy web-scraping or long-running workflows can consume the monthly allowance quickly and require add-on credit packs.; Flowable the open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.
They diverge on capability: Autonoly covers Natural language workflow builder, Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine.
Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Autonoly and Flowable actually diverge.

Attributes where Autonoly and Flowable differ
Attribute	Autonoly	Flowable
Pricing model	freemium	quote
Platforms	web, api	Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Autonoly

Natural language workflow builder
Web scraping
Reports and dashboards
Python and code execution
Scheduling
App integrations
Workflow analytics

Only in Flowable

BPMN 2.0 engine
CMMN case management
DMN decision tables
Spring Boot integration
Modelling studio
Task and case application
REST APIs
History and audit

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Autonoly

Scraping data from websites into spreadsheets or dashboardsnot Flowable
Generating scheduled Excel and PDF reports automaticallynot Flowable
Chaining multi-step workflows across business appsnot Flowable
Running Python scripts and lightweight ML pipelines on a schedulenot Flowable
Sending automated alerts and notifications to Slack, Discord, or emailnot Flowable

Flowable

An insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and BPMN alone cannot express itnot Autonoly
A bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing Spring Boot estate rather than buying a separate platformnot Autonoly
A team leaving Activiti or jBPM that wants the same API family with active commercial maintenancenot Autonoly
A regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisorsnot Autonoly

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Autonoly

Pricing is credit-based, so heavy web-scraping or long-running workflows can consume the monthly allowance quickly and require add-on credit packs.
The free plan allows 1,000 credits and three concurrent workflows a month, which is enough to trial the product but not to run anything continuously.
No published mobile apps (iOS/Android); the platform is web-based only.
Company details such as founding date, founders, and team size are not disclosed on the site, making it harder to evaluate the vendor's track record.
As an AI-agent-driven scraper/executor, reliability on sites with aggressive bot protection or frequently changing layouts may vary compared to purpose-built RPA tools.

Flowable

The open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.
It expects Java engineering capacity; teams looking for a business-user low-code automation tool will find the modelling and deployment cycle far too technical.
Enterprise pricing is not published and is quoted per deployment, leaving buyers without a benchmark against Camunda or IBM alternatives.
The Activiti fork left three engines with related APIs and overlapping documentation in circulation, and search results routinely return advice for the wrong one.
Flowable AG is a small Swiss company relative to its competitors, so the partner network, training market and pool of engineers with production experience are all limited outside Europe.

Pricing, plan by plan

Autonoly

Free

FreeFree
- 1,000 credits/month
- 3 concurrent AI agent workflows
- Community support
Starter$29/month
- 10,000 credits/month
- 5 concurrent workflows
- 3 parallel agents
Growth$59/month
- 30,000 credits/month
- 15 concurrent workflows
- 5 parallel agents
Pro$99/month
- 60,000 credits/month
- 50 concurrent workflows
- 15 parallel agents

Flowable

Free

Flowable Open SourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines
- Embeddable Java library or standalone apps
- No modelling studio or enterprise applications
Flowable Enterprise$undefined/year
- Modelling studio, work application and admin console
- Connectors, forms and advanced identity management
- Support with SLA and version maintenance

Which should you pick?

Choose Autonoly if

You need natural language workflow builder.
You want to start without paying.
You work on web, api.
You also want web scraping.

Autonoly review

Choose Flowable if

You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
You want to start without paying.
You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
You also want cmmn case management.

Flowable review

Questions people ask

Is Autonoly or Flowable better?: Neither clearly leads. Autonoly starts at Free and Flowable at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Autonoly or Flowable?: Autonoly starts at Free and Flowable at Free.
Does Autonoly or Flowable run on more platforms?: Autonoly runs on web, api. Flowable runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
Can I use Autonoly for free?: Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Autonoly best used for?: Autonoly is most often used for scraping data from websites into spreadsheets or dashboards, generating scheduled excel and pdf reports automatically, chaining multi-step workflows across business apps, running python scripts and lightweight ml pipelines on a schedule. Of those, scraping data from websites into spreadsheets or dashboards and generating scheduled excel and pdf reports automatically are not what Flowable is typically brought in for.
What can Autonoly do that Flowable cannot?: Autonoly covers Natural language workflow builder, Web scraping, Reports and dashboards, Python and code execution. Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, CMMN case management, DMN decision tables, Spring Boot integration.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Autonoly: How does Autonoly charge?

By credits rather than per task. Free covers 1,000 credits a month, Starter is $29, Growth $59 and Pro $99, with Enterprise priced on application. Simple actions cost 1 to 3 credits and advanced AI operations 5 to 15.

Source

Flowable: Is Flowable open source?

Yes, the BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines are Apache 2.0. The modelling studio and enterprise applications are commercial.

Autonoly: Is there a free plan?

Yes. It includes 1,000 credits a month and three concurrent AI agent workflows, with community support. No card is required to start.

Source

Flowable: How does it relate to Activiti and jBPM?

The same core developers built jBPM, then Activiti, then forked Activiti in 2016 to create Flowable.

Autonoly: What happens if I run out of credits?

Autonoly notifies you and suggests optimisations rather than stopping outright: you can upgrade at any time, or have non-critical workflows paused automatically until the allowance resets.

Source

Flowable: What does Flowable Enterprise cost?

Nothing is published. It is quoted per deployment by the vendor.

Autonoly: Can I change plan partway through a month?

Yes. Upgrades and downgrades take effect immediately and billing is prorated. Autonoly also offers 50% off paid plans for nonprofits.

Source

Flowable: Why choose it over Camunda?

CMMN case management is a first-class engine, which matters when work is exception-driven rather than a fixed sequence.

Autonoly vs Flowable

Autonoly

Flowable

The short version

Where they differ

What each one covers

Only in Autonoly

Only in Flowable

What people use each for

Autonoly

Flowable

Where each one falls short

Autonoly

Flowable

Pricing, plan by plan

Autonoly

Flowable

Which should you pick?

Choose Autonoly if

Choose Flowable if

Questions people ask

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Related pages

More on Autonoly

More on Flowable

Keep looking

Other head to heads