Cybersecurity · head to head
Authy vs Quantexa

Authy
Cybersecurity
Twilio's free authenticator app with encrypted cloud backup, mobile only since the desktop clients were withdrawn in 2024.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Quantexa
Cybersecurity
Entity resolution and network analytics for financial crime investigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Authy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Authy there is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.; Quantexa pricing is never published and lands in the seven figure range annually for a tier one deployment, so it is out of reach for mid-sized institutions no matter how well the analytics would fit.
- They diverge on capability: Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Quantexa covers Entity resolution.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authy and Quantexa actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authy
- Encrypted cloud backup
- Multi-device sync
- Standard TOTP
- Offline code generation
- App lock
- Multi-device toggle
- Token organisation
- Free with no account tier
Only in Quantexa
- Entity resolution
- Network generation
- Contextual monitoring
- Investigation workspace
- Data fusion
- Deployment on customer cloud
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authy
- An individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phonenot Quantexa
- A small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handsetnot Quantexa
- Replacing SMS-based codes with TOTP for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficultnot Quantexa
- Consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and iconsnot Quantexa
Quantexa
- A bank whose AML alert backlog is dominated by false positives and wants network context to close them fasternot Authy
- Sanctions investigation where the sanctioned party is not the account holder but a connected director or shareholdernot Authy
- Merging customer records across retail, commercial and wealth divisions after an acquisition to see total exposurenot Authy
- A tax or benefits agency looking for organised fraud rings rather than individual claimantsnot Authy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authy
- There is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.
- The Windows, macOS and Linux desktop applications were discontinued in 2024 and stopped working, so any workflow that depended on copying codes on a computer now requires a phone in hand, and users who held tokens only on a desktop client had to restore from backup or re-enrol.
- The account is keyed to a phone number, so an attacker who takes over that number through a SIM swap can begin the device registration flow, and the only remaining control is the backup password that most users set once and cannot recall.
- In 2024 an unauthenticated Twilio endpoint allowed attackers to confirm which numbers from a supplied list were registered Authy accounts, exposing around 33 million phone numbers, which disclosed no codes but handed phishers a validated list of people known to use two-factor authentication.
- It is a free consumer application inside a company that has already retired the paid Authy developer API it once supported, so it carries no revenue of its own, and users should treat its continued existence as a business decision rather than a roadmap commitment.
Quantexa
- Pricing is never published and lands in the seven figure range annually for a tier one deployment, so it is out of reach for mid-sized institutions no matter how well the analytics would fit.
- Output quality is bounded by input data quality, and organisations without governed customer data spend the first phase of the programme fixing feeds rather than catching criminals.
- Implementation typically requires a systems integrator and runs into quarters rather than weeks, so the business case has to survive a long period with no operational benefit.
- The platform augments rather than replaces existing transaction monitoring, so you keep paying for the incumbent system alongside it and total compliance technology spend rises before it falls.
- Skills are scarce; the platform needs people who understand both Spark scale data engineering and financial crime typologies, and those people are hard to recruit and easy to lose.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Authy review.
Quantexa
On request- Quantexa Platform$undefined/year
- Entity resolution and network generation
- Deployed in customer cloud tenancy
- Priced by data volume and use case count
Which should you pick?
Choose Authy if
- You need encrypted cloud backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want multi-device sync.
Choose Quantexa if
- You need entity resolution.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want network generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Authy or Quantexa better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authy starts at Free and Quantexa at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authy or Quantexa?
- Authy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Authy and On request for Quantexa.
- Does Authy or Quantexa run on more platforms?
- Authy runs on Web. Quantexa runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Authy for free?
- Yes. Authy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Quantexa starts at On request.
- What is Authy best used for?
- Authy is most often used for an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone, a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset, replacing sms-based codes with totp for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficult, consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and icons. Of those, an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone and a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset are not what Quantexa is typically brought in for.
- What can Authy do that Quantexa cannot?
- Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Multi-device sync, Standard TOTP, Offline code generation. Quantexa covers Entity resolution, Network generation, Contextual monitoring, Investigation workspace.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authy: Is Authy still supported?
The mobile apps for iOS and Android are still available and functional. The desktop applications were withdrawn in 2024 and the Authy developer API has been retired in favour of Twilio Verify, so the surrounding product has been shrinking.
Quantexa: Does Quantexa replace our transaction monitoring system?
No. It usually sits alongside it, adding network context to the alerts that system generates and to investigations.
Authy: Can I export my tokens?
No. There is no export of the underlying secrets, by design. Migrating to another authenticator means going to each service, disabling two-factor authentication and setting it up again with the new app.
Quantexa: Where does our data go?
Into your own cloud tenancy in the normal deployment model. Quantexa does not require you to send customer data to a shared multi-tenant service.
Authy: What happened to the desktop app?
Twilio announced its discontinuation in March 2024 and the applications stopped working later that year. There is no replacement desktop client; the mobile apps are the product now.
Quantexa: How is it priced?
Not publicly. Expect an annual subscription scaled by data volume and number of use cases, plus separate implementation cost.
Authy: Is multi-device sync safe to leave on?
It is the feature most worth understanding. Leaving new device registration enabled means anyone who controls your phone number can attempt to add a device. The usual advice is to turn the multi-device setting off once your devices are registered and turn it on only when you need to add one.
Authy: What if I lose my phone and forget the backup password?
The secrets are encrypted with that password and Twilio does not hold it, so they cannot be recovered. You would fall back to each individual service's account recovery process, which is exactly the situation the backup was meant to avoid.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Authy vs LastPass
- Authy vs 1Password
- Authy vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Authy vs Norton 360
- Authy vs Google Authenticator
- Authy vs Cisco Duo
- Authy vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Authy vs RoboForm
- Authy vs ExpressVPN
- Authy vs Authelia
- Authy vs Stytch
- Authy vs WorkOS
- Authy vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Authy vs Sticky Password
- Authy vs Surfshark
- Authy vs Tanium
- Authy vs Teleport
- Authy vs Silent Eight
- Authy vs NICE Actimize
- Authy vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Authy vs Feedzai
- Authy vs ThetaRay
- Authy vs Jumio
- Authy vs Fenergo
- Authy vs Sumsub
- Authy vs iDenfy
- Authy vs Shufti Pro
- Authy vs Unit21
- Authy vs Sardine
- Authy vs Syft
- Authy vs Trivy
- Authy vs Trulioo
- Authy vs Veracode
- Quantexa vs LastPass
- Quantexa vs 1Password
- Quantexa vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Quantexa vs Norton 360
- Quantexa vs Google Authenticator
- Quantexa vs Cisco Duo
- Quantexa vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Quantexa vs RoboForm
- Quantexa vs ExpressVPN
- Quantexa vs Authelia
- Quantexa vs Stytch
- Quantexa vs WorkOS
- Quantexa vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Quantexa vs Sticky Password
- Quantexa vs Surfshark
- Quantexa vs Tanium
- Quantexa vs Teleport
- Quantexa vs Silent Eight
- Quantexa vs NICE Actimize
- Quantexa vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Quantexa vs Feedzai
- Quantexa vs ThetaRay
- Quantexa vs Jumio
- Quantexa vs Fenergo
- Quantexa vs Sumsub
- Quantexa vs iDenfy
- Quantexa vs Shufti Pro
- Quantexa vs Unit21
- Quantexa vs Sardine
- Quantexa vs Syft
- Quantexa vs Trivy
- Quantexa vs Trulioo
- Quantexa vs Veracode
