Cybersecurity · head to head
Authy vs HashiCorp Boundary

Authy
Cybersecurity
Twilio's free authenticator app with encrypted cloud backup, mobile only since the desktop clients were withdrawn in 2024.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

HashiCorp Boundary
Cybersecurity
Identity-aware session broker for infrastructure access without distributing credentials
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authy there is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.; HashiCorp Boundary hashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- They diverge on capability: Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authy and HashiCorp Boundary actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authy | HashiCorp Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | free | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, macOS, Windows, Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authy
- Encrypted cloud backup
- Multi-device sync
- Standard TOTP
- Offline code generation
- App lock
- Multi-device toggle
- Token organisation
- Free with no account tier
Only in HashiCorp Boundary
- Identity-based access
- Just-in-time credentials
- Dynamic host catalogues
- Session recording
- Transparent sessions
- Multi-hop workers
- Audit logging
- Terraform provider
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authy
- An individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phonenot HashiCorp Boundary
- A small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handsetnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Replacing SMS-based codes with TOTP for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficultnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and iconsnot HashiCorp Boundary
HashiCorp Boundary
- A platform team replacing shared SSH keys and a bastion host so that leavers lose access the moment they are removed from the identity providernot Authy
- Granting contractors time-boxed database access without ever issuing them a credential they could keepnot Authy
- An estate where autoscaling replaces hosts continuously and a static access list is always out of datenot Authy
- Producing session recordings as evidence for an audit that requires proof of who touched production and what they rannot Authy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authy
- There is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.
- The Windows, macOS and Linux desktop applications were discontinued in 2024 and stopped working, so any workflow that depended on copying codes on a computer now requires a phone in hand, and users who held tokens only on a desktop client had to restore from backup or re-enrol.
- The account is keyed to a phone number, so an attacker who takes over that number through a SIM swap can begin the device registration flow, and the only remaining control is the backup password that most users set once and cannot recall.
- In 2024 an unauthenticated Twilio endpoint allowed attackers to confirm which numbers from a supplied list were registered Authy accounts, exposing around 33 million phone numbers, which disclosed no codes but handed phishers a validated list of people known to use two-factor authentication.
- It is a free consumer application inside a company that has already retired the paid Authy developer API it once supported, so it carries no revenue of its own, and users should treat its continued existence as a business decision rather than a roadmap commitment.
HashiCorp Boundary
- HashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- Enterprise pricing is not published anywhere, and the features most organisations actually need for compliance, notably session recording, are Enterprise only, so the free community edition is rarely the version you end up buying.
- It solves access to infrastructure, not to applications; browser-based internal tools, SaaS admin consoles and APIs need a separate control, so Boundary is one component of a zero-trust programme rather than the whole thing.
- Running it yourself means operating controllers, worker nodes and a Postgres database in a highly available configuration, and if that control plane is down nobody can reach production, which makes it a new critical dependency.
- It is materially easier to adopt if you already run Vault and Terraform; teams without that ecosystem face a steeper learning curve than a device-based mesh product like Tailscale, for a similar access outcome.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Authy review.
HashiCorp Boundary
Free- Boundary Community EditionFree
- MPL 2.0 open source
- Self-hosted controllers and workers
- Identity-based target access
- Boundary Enterprise$undefined/year
- Session recording and playback
- Multi-hop and transparent sessions
- Multi-tenancy via scopes
Which should you pick?
Choose Authy if
- You need encrypted cloud backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want multi-device sync.
Choose HashiCorp Boundary if
- You need identity-based access.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- You also want just-in-time credentials.
Questions people ask
- Is Authy or HashiCorp Boundary better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authy starts at Free and HashiCorp Boundary at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authy or HashiCorp Boundary?
- Authy starts at Free and HashiCorp Boundary at Free.
- Does Authy or HashiCorp Boundary run on more platforms?
- Authy runs on Web. HashiCorp Boundary runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- Can I use Authy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authy best used for?
- Authy is most often used for an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone, a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset, replacing sms-based codes with totp for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficult, consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and icons. Of those, an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone and a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset are not what HashiCorp Boundary is typically brought in for.
- What can Authy do that HashiCorp Boundary cannot?
- Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Multi-device sync, Standard TOTP, Offline code generation. HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access, Just-in-time credentials, Dynamic host catalogues, Session recording.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authy: Is Authy still supported?
The mobile apps for iOS and Android are still available and functional. The desktop applications were withdrawn in 2024 and the Authy developer API has been retired in favour of Twilio Verify, so the surrounding product has been shrinking.
HashiCorp Boundary: Is Boundary open source?
The community edition is, under MPL 2.0. Boundary Enterprise is commercial and is now sold through IBM Passport Advantage.
Authy: Can I export my tokens?
No. There is no export of the underlying secrets, by design. Migrating to another authenticator means going to each service, disabling two-factor authentication and setting it up again with the new app.
HashiCorp Boundary: Does it replace a VPN?
For infrastructure access, largely yes. It grants a session to a specific target rather than putting the user on a network, but it does not cover browser-based internal applications.
Authy: What happened to the desktop app?
Twilio announced its discontinuation in March 2024 and the applications stopped working later that year. There is no replacement desktop client; the mobile apps are the product now.
HashiCorp Boundary: What does Boundary Enterprise cost?
HashiCorp does not publish Boundary pricing. It is quoted, and since the IBM acquisition it is transacted on IBM licensing paper.
Authy: Is multi-device sync safe to leave on?
It is the feature most worth understanding. Leaving new device registration enabled means anyone who controls your phone number can attempt to add a device. The usual advice is to turn the multi-device setting off once your devices are registered and turn it on only when you need to add one.
HashiCorp Boundary: Do I need Vault to use it?
No, but the just-in-time credential brokering that makes Boundary worthwhile depends on Vault or an equivalent secrets store.
Authy: What if I lose my phone and forget the backup password?
The secrets are encrypted with that password and Twilio does not hold it, so they cannot be recovered. You would fall back to each individual service's account recovery process, which is exactly the situation the backup was meant to avoid.
Related pages
More on HashiCorp Boundary
Other head to heads
- Authy vs LastPass
- Authy vs 1Password
- Authy vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Authy vs Norton 360
- Authy vs Google Authenticator
- Authy vs Cisco Duo
- Authy vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Authy vs RoboForm
- Authy vs ExpressVPN
- Authy vs Authelia
- Authy vs Stytch
- Authy vs WorkOS
- Authy vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Authy vs Sticky Password
- Authy vs Surfshark
- Authy vs Tanium
- Authy vs Teleport
- Authy vs BeyondTrust
- Authy vs Delinea
- Authy vs Infisical
- Authy vs authentik
- Authy vs Logto
- Authy vs Ory
- Authy vs Saviynt
- Authy vs Beyond Identity
- Authy vs One Identity
- Authy vs Keygen
- Authy vs KnowBe4
- Authy vs Legit Security
- Authy vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Authy vs Metasploit
- Authy vs MetricStream
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LastPass
- HashiCorp Boundary vs 1Password
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Bitdefender Total Security
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Norton 360
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Google Authenticator
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Cisco Duo
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- HashiCorp Boundary vs RoboForm
- HashiCorp Boundary vs ExpressVPN
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Authelia
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Stytch
- HashiCorp Boundary vs WorkOS
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Sticky Password
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Surfshark
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Tanium
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Teleport
- HashiCorp Boundary vs BeyondTrust
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Delinea
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Infisical
- HashiCorp Boundary vs authentik
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Logto
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Ory
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Saviynt
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Beyond Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs One Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Keygen
- HashiCorp Boundary vs KnowBe4
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Legit Security
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LogRhythm SIEM
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Metasploit
- HashiCorp Boundary vs MetricStream
