Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs Trend Micro Vision One

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Trend Micro Vision One
Cybersecurity
XDR platform correlating Trend Micro's endpoint, email, server, cloud and network sensors, licensed through a shared credit pool.
- From
- $75/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Authelia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; Trend Micro Vision One licensing is a credit pool consumed at different rates by different modules, so forecasting a renewal means modelling which capabilities you will activate rather than counting users, and switching on a new module silently draws down the budget for an existing one.
- They diverge on capability: Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Trend Micro Vision One covers Cross-layer correlation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and Trend Micro Vision One actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authelia | Trend Micro Vision One |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $75/year |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Web, Desktop, Cloud |
| Founded | Unknown | 1988 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in Trend Micro Vision One
- Cross-layer correlation
- Virtual patching
- Workbench and search
- Email sensor
- Attack surface risk management
- Container and cloud posture
- Response actions
- Credit-based licensing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot Trend Micro Vision One
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot Trend Micro Vision One
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot Trend Micro Vision One
Trend Micro Vision One
- A datacentre estate carrying unpatchable or end-of-life servers where virtual patching provides cover that patching cannotnot Authelia
- An organisation already running Trend endpoint and email that wants correlation across them without buying a separate XDR vendornot Authelia
- Mid-market security teams that want one console and one contract rather than integrating four vendors themselvesnot Authelia
- Regulated organisations needing a specific hosting region for detection telemetry rather than a single global instancenot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
Trend Micro Vision One
- Licensing is a credit pool consumed at different rates by different modules, so forecasting a renewal means modelling which capabilities you will activate rather than counting users, and switching on a new module silently draws down the budget for an existing one.
- Retention in the XDR data lake beyond the included window is bought with additional credits, so the retrospective hunting the platform is sold on is precisely the part with an ongoing meter attached, and teams shorten retention to control spend.
- The correlation that justifies the platform only exists over deployed Trend sensors, so an organisation running only the endpoint agent gets an EDR with a large console, and reaching the advertised value means a de facto single-vendor commitment across email, network and workload.
- Legacy management planes persist: Apex Central, Deep Security Manager and the older Cloud One consoles overlap with Vision One and migrations have run for years, so administrators frequently maintain two consoles for the same agents and learn both.
- The agents hook file and network operations, so on build servers, database hosts and developer machines the overhead is noticeable, and the standard remedy is broad path exclusions that remove protection from exactly the directories where attackers stage tooling.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Trend Micro Vision One
$75/year- Vision One Essentials$75/year
- XDR analytics
- Threat intelligence
- Risk insights
- Vision One Standard$125/year
- All Essentials features
- Attack surface management
- Automated response
- Vision One Advanced$200/year
- All Standard features
- Managed XDR
- 24/7 monitoring
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Choose Trend Micro Vision One if
- You need cross-layer correlation.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Cloud.
- You also want virtual patching.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or Trend Micro Vision One better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and Trend Micro Vision One at $75/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or Trend Micro Vision One?
- Authelia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Authelia and $75/year for Trend Micro Vision One.
- Does Authelia or Trend Micro Vision One run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Trend Micro Vision One runs on Web, Desktop, Cloud.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Yes. Authelia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Trend Micro Vision One starts at $75/year.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what Trend Micro Vision One is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that Trend Micro Vision One cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends. Trend Micro Vision One covers Cross-layer correlation, Virtual patching, Workbench and search, Email sensor.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Trend Micro Vision One: What are Trend Micro Credits?
A single purchased pool of licensing units drawn down by whichever Vision One modules you activate, at different rates per module and per protected object. It replaces separate per-product subscriptions and shifts the forecasting problem onto you.
Authelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
Trend Micro Vision One: Is this the same thing as Deep Security?
Not the same, but related. Server and workload protection in Vision One descends from Deep Security, and Trend has been migrating Deep Security and Cloud One Workload Security customers onto the Vision One platform. Existing Deep Security deployments still exist in the field.
Authelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
Trend Micro Vision One: Does it replace my SIEM?
No. It correlates and retains telemetry from Trend sensors and selected third parties, but it is not a general-purpose log store for every system in the estate, and compliance log retention requirements are usually still met elsewhere.
Trend Micro Vision One: Do I have to use Trend endpoint protection?
To get real value, effectively yes. Third-party ingestion exists but the correlation quality depends on Trend's own sensor telemetry, and a Vision One deployment over someone else's endpoint agent is not what the platform is designed around.
Trend Micro Vision One: Where is the data held?
In the regional instance you choose at onboarding. Confirm the specific region against your residency obligations before deployment, because moving afterwards is a migration.
Related pages
More on Trend Micro Vision One
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Authelia vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Authelia vs Norton 360
- Authelia vs LastPass
- Authelia vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Authelia vs Proofpoint
- Authelia vs Sysdig
- Authelia vs Darktrace
- Authelia vs Qualys VMDR
- Authelia vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Authelia vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Authelia vs Enpass
- Authelia vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Authelia vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Authelia vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Authelia vs HID Global
- Authelia vs IBM QRadar
- Trend Micro Vision One vs authentik
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Logto
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Ory Kratos
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Frontegg
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Infisical
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Bitwarden
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Semgrep
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Trivy
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Chainguard
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Passbolt
- Trend Micro Vision One vs 1Password
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Signicat
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Silent Eight
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Socket
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Socure
- Trend Micro Vision One vs SonicWall
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Sophos Intercept X
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Ory
- Trend Micro Vision One vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Norton 360
- Trend Micro Vision One vs LastPass
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Proofpoint
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Sysdig
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Darktrace
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Qualys VMDR
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Enpass
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Trend Micro Vision One vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Trend Micro Vision One vs HID Global
- Trend Micro Vision One vs IBM QRadar
