Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs Bidnet Direct

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Bidnet Direct
Government
Regional bid notification network where agencies post free and suppliers pay for alerts
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Authelia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; Bidnet Direct suppliers pay for aggregation, not access: the same solicitations are generally published free on individual agency and state portals, so the subscription is only worth it if searching manually costs more than the fee.
- They diverge on capability: Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Bidnet Direct covers Regional purchasing groups.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and Bidnet Direct actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authelia | Bidnet Direct |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in Bidnet Direct
- Regional purchasing groups
- Free agency publication
- Supplier notification
- Vendor registration
- Bid document distribution
- Award postings
- Supplier diversity reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot Bidnet Direct
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot Bidnet Direct
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot Bidnet Direct
Bidnet Direct
- A small municipal purchasing department that needs competitive responses without building or paying for its own bid portalnot Authelia
- A contractor that wants notification of every relevant solicitation across a state rather than checking dozens of agency websitesnot Authelia
- A state cooperative wanting a single regional portal so suppliers register once for many agenciesnot Authelia
- An agency required to demonstrate outreach to certified diverse suppliers on every solicitationnot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
Bidnet Direct
- Suppliers pay for aggregation, not access: the same solicitations are generally published free on individual agency and state portals, so the subscription is only worth it if searching manually costs more than the fee.
- Supplier pricing is not published and varies by geography and category breadth, which makes it difficult for a small contractor to judge value before a sales conversation.
- Category matching produces a high volume of irrelevant alerts for suppliers whose work does not map neatly onto procurement commodity codes, so the notification stream needs constant tuning.
- Bidnet is now one brand inside SOVRA, which divested six business units in 2025 under new private equity ownership, so portfolio priorities can change independently of any individual product's customers.
- For agencies it is a publication and notification network rather than a sourcing system: bid evaluation, scoring and contract management need a separate tool.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Bidnet Direct
On request- Supplier subscription$undefined/year
- Matched opportunity notifications
- Access to regional purchasing group solicitations
- Priced by geographic and category coverage
- Agency participation$undefined/year
- Solicitation publication and vendor registry
- Free or low cost to participating public agencies
- Supplier diversity reporting
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Choose Bidnet Direct if
- You need regional purchasing groups.
- You also want free agency publication.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or Bidnet Direct better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and Bidnet Direct at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or Bidnet Direct?
- Authelia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Authelia and On request for Bidnet Direct.
- Does Authelia or Bidnet Direct run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Bidnet Direct runs on Web.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Yes. Authelia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Bidnet Direct starts at On request.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what Bidnet Direct is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that Bidnet Direct cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends. Bidnet Direct covers Regional purchasing groups, Free agency publication, Supplier notification, Vendor registration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Bidnet Direct: Do government agencies pay?
Generally not, or very little. The network is funded by supplier subscriptions, which is why agencies get an existing supplier pool without paying for it.
Authelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
Bidnet Direct: Is it worth it for a supplier?
Only if aggregation saves you more than it costs. The solicitations are public and available free elsewhere; you are buying alerting and search across many agencies at once.
Authelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
Bidnet Direct: Who owns it now?
SOVRA, the rebranded procurement business of mdf commerce, which was acquired by KKR. Bidnet Direct remains a named product within that portfolio.
Bidnet Direct: Does it evaluate bids?
No. It publishes and distributes. Scoring, evaluation and contract management require a sourcing platform.
Related pages
More on Bidnet Direct
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs Bonfire
- Authelia vs Periscope Holdings
- Authelia vs OpenGov
- Authelia vs DemandStar
- Authelia vs RecDesk
- Authelia vs Socrata
- Authelia vs eCode360
- Authelia vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Authelia vs VUEWorks
- Authelia vs American Legal Publishing
- Authelia vs ArchiveSocial
- Authelia vs OnBase
- Authelia vs Polco
- Authelia vs PublicInput
- Authelia vs Axon Records
- Authelia vs Euna Solutions
- Bidnet Direct vs authentik
- Bidnet Direct vs Logto
- Bidnet Direct vs Ory Kratos
- Bidnet Direct vs Frontegg
- Bidnet Direct vs Infisical
- Bidnet Direct vs Bitwarden
- Bidnet Direct vs Semgrep
- Bidnet Direct vs Trivy
- Bidnet Direct vs Chainguard
- Bidnet Direct vs Passbolt
- Bidnet Direct vs 1Password
- Bidnet Direct vs Signicat
- Bidnet Direct vs Silent Eight
- Bidnet Direct vs Socket
- Bidnet Direct vs Socure
- Bidnet Direct vs SonicWall
- Bidnet Direct vs Sophos Intercept X
- Bidnet Direct vs Ory
- Bidnet Direct vs Bonfire
- Bidnet Direct vs Periscope Holdings
- Bidnet Direct vs OpenGov
- Bidnet Direct vs DemandStar
- Bidnet Direct vs RecDesk
- Bidnet Direct vs Socrata
- Bidnet Direct vs eCode360
- Bidnet Direct vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Bidnet Direct vs VUEWorks
- Bidnet Direct vs American Legal Publishing
- Bidnet Direct vs ArchiveSocial
- Bidnet Direct vs OnBase
- Bidnet Direct vs Polco
- Bidnet Direct vs PublicInput
- Bidnet Direct vs Axon Records
- Bidnet Direct vs Euna Solutions
