Technology · head to head
Auth0 vs Soketi

Soketi
Developer Tools
Self-hosted, Pusher-compatible WebSockets server with a stalled maintenance record
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Auth0 free tier limited to 25,000 monthly active users, requiring upgrade for growth beyond that; Soketi maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- They diverge on capability: Auth0 covers Universal login, Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auth0 and Soketi actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auth0
- Universal login
- Social login
- Multi-factor authentication
- Passwordless
- User management
- Anomaly detection
- Extensibility
- Machine to machine
Only in Soketi
- Pusher protocol compatibility
- Presence and private channels
- Horizontal scaling
- App management backends
- Webhooks
- Prometheus metrics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auth0
- B2C authenticationnot Soketi
- B2B authenticationnot Soketi
- B2E authenticationnot Soketi
- API securitynot Soketi
- Mobile app securitynot Soketi
Soketi
- A Laravel application that already uses Echo and wants to stop paying a hosted realtime providernot Auth0
- Realtime notifications or presence indicators where data must not leave your own infrastructure for compliance reasonsnot Auth0
- A local or CI environment that needs a Pusher-compatible server without hitting a paid accountnot Auth0
- A high-connection-count application where hosted per-connection pricing has become the largest line in the infrastructure billnot Auth0
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auth0
- Free tier limited to 25,000 monthly active users, requiring upgrade for growth beyond that
- Advanced features like MFA and RBAC only available on paid Essentials tier and above
- Ownership by Okta introduces risk that independent product roadmap may change
Soketi
- Maintenance has effectively stalled: the maintainer has said time is severely limited, releases are infrequent, and the community has been discussing whether the project is abandoned, which means security fixes may not arrive.
- Dependency drift on Node and uWebSockets.js will eventually force you to fork or migrate, and that cost is unbudgeted at the point you adopt it.
- There is no commercial support to buy, so a production incident at three in the morning is entirely your problem with no escalation path.
- Scaling beyond a single node needs Redis and careful configuration, and getting presence channels correct across nodes is a genuine source of subtle bugs.
- It implements the Pusher protocol rather than tracking it, so any protocol feature Pusher adds later will not appear, and the compatibility guarantee slowly decays.
Pricing, plan by plan
Auth0
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 25,000 monthly active users
- Basic authentication
- Email/password login
- Essentials (B2C)$35/month
- Unlimited MAUs beyond free tier
- Multi-Factor Authentication
- Role-Based Access Control
- Professional (B2C)$240/month
- All Essentials features
- Advanced security
- Custom branding
Soketi
Free- SoketiFree
- MIT licensed
- Unlimited connections subject to your own hardware
- No vendor billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Auth0 if
- You need universal login.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want social login.
Choose Soketi if
- You need pusher protocol compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want presence and private channels.
Questions people ask
- Is Auth0 or Soketi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auth0 starts at Free and Soketi at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auth0 or Soketi?
- Auth0 starts at Free and Soketi at Free.
- Does Auth0 or Soketi run on more platforms?
- Auth0 runs on Web, iOS, Android. Soketi runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Auth0 for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Auth0 best used for?
- Auth0 is most often used for b2c authentication, b2b authentication, b2e authentication, api security. Of those, b2c authentication and b2b authentication are not what Soketi is typically brought in for.
- What can Auth0 do that Soketi cannot?
- Auth0 covers Universal login, Social login, Multi-factor authentication, Passwordless. Soketi covers Pusher protocol compatibility, Presence and private channels, Horizontal scaling, App management backends.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Auth0: How much does Auth0 cost?
Auth0 has a Free tier for up to 25,000 monthly active users (MAUs). Paid plans start at $35/month (Essentials B2C) and scale to $240/month (Professional B2C) and higher for Enterprise. Pricing scales with MAU usage.
SourceSoketi: Is Soketi still maintained?
Barely. The maintainer has stated that available time is very limited and releases have been sparse; treat it as community-maintained.
Auth0: Does Auth0 include Multi-Factor Authentication?
No. MFA, RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), and premium support are not included in the free tier and require upgrading to paid Essentials plans or higher.
SourceSoketi: Do I need to change my client code?
No. Pusher client SDKs and Laravel Echo work by changing the host, port and credentials.
Auth0: Is Auth0 independent or part of a larger company?
Auth0 was acquired by Okta in May 2021 for $6.5 billion. It now operates as a subsidiary business unit within Okta, but maintains its own brand and operations.
SourceSoketi: What does it cost?
Nothing in licence fees. It is MIT licensed; you pay for the server it runs on.
Auth0: Who should use Auth0 vs Okta?
Auth0 is developer-focused and serves customer identity use cases (B2C). Okta serves workforce identity (B2B) and has broader enterprise features. Auth0 now serves both markets post-acquisition but maintains its developer-friendly positioning.
SourceSoketi: What are people moving to?
Laravel Reverb for Laravel applications, and Sockudo, a Rust reimplementation, for others.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Auth0 vs Dashlane
- Auth0 vs GitLab
- Auth0 vs PostHog
- Auth0 vs Datadog
- Auth0 vs LaunchDarkly
- Auth0 vs LogRocket
- Auth0 vs Postman
- Auth0 vs Jira
- Auth0 vs Sentry
- Auth0 vs Eclipse
- Auth0 vs Docker
- Auth0 vs Supabase
- Auth0 vs Honeycomb
- Auth0 vs Istio
- Auth0 vs Lucidchart
- Auth0 vs MongoDB
- Auth0 vs Nagios XI
- Auth0 vs MongoDB Atlas
- Auth0 vs PartyKit
- Auth0 vs Penpot
- Auth0 vs Atlantis
- Auth0 vs Coder
- Auth0 vs Backstage
- Auth0 vs Xlinesoft
- Auth0 vs Bazel
- Auth0 vs Eclipse IDE
- Auth0 vs Pants Build
- Auth0 vs Ansible
- Auth0 vs Helix
- Auth0 vs Jitsu
- Auth0 vs Avo
- Auth0 vs Azure DevOps
- Auth0 vs Bitbucket
- Auth0 vs Claude Code
- Auth0 vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Soketi vs Dashlane
- Soketi vs GitLab
- Soketi vs PostHog
- Soketi vs Datadog
- Soketi vs LaunchDarkly
- Soketi vs LogRocket
- Soketi vs Postman
- Soketi vs Jira
- Soketi vs Sentry
- Soketi vs Eclipse
- Soketi vs Docker
- Soketi vs Supabase
- Soketi vs Honeycomb
- Soketi vs Istio
- Soketi vs Lucidchart
- Soketi vs MongoDB
- Soketi vs Nagios XI
- Soketi vs MongoDB Atlas
- Soketi vs PartyKit
- Soketi vs Penpot
- Soketi vs Atlantis
- Soketi vs Coder
- Soketi vs Backstage
- Soketi vs Xlinesoft
- Soketi vs Bazel
- Soketi vs Eclipse IDE
- Soketi vs Pants Build
- Soketi vs Ansible
- Soketi vs Helix
- Soketi vs Jitsu
- Soketi vs Avo
- Soketi vs Azure DevOps
- Soketi vs Bitbucket
- Soketi vs Claude Code
- Soketi vs Cloud Native Buildpacks

