Technology · head to head
Auth0 vs Frontegg

Frontegg
Cybersecurity
Customer identity and access management platform for SaaS applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Auth0 free tier limited to 25,000 monthly active users, requiring upgrade for growth beyond that; Frontegg detailed per-unit pricing beyond the free tier is not published, requiring use of an online calculator or sales contact to estimate costs.
- They diverge on capability: Auth0 covers Universal login, Frontegg covers Hosted login.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auth0 and Frontegg actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auth0
- Universal login
- Social login
- Multi-factor authentication
- Passwordless
- User management
- Anomaly detection
- Extensibility
- Machine to machine
Only in Frontegg
- Hosted login
- Enterprise SSO/SCIM
- Multi-tenant organizations
- Custom domains
- M2M tokens
- Fraud protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auth0
- B2C authenticationnot Frontegg
- B2B authenticationnot Frontegg
- B2E authenticationnot Frontegg
- API securitynot Frontegg
- Mobile app securitynot Frontegg
Frontegg
- Adding enterprise SSO/SCIM to a B2B SaaS productnot Auth0
- Multi-tenant customer identity managementnot Auth0
- White-labeled, custom-domain login experiencesnot Auth0
- Securing AI agent access to a SaaS product via Agen.conot Auth0
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auth0
- Free tier limited to 25,000 monthly active users, requiring upgrade for growth beyond that
- Advanced features like MFA and RBAC only available on paid Essentials tier and above
- Ownership by Okta introduces risk that independent product roadmap may change
Frontegg
- Detailed per-unit pricing beyond the free tier is not published, requiring use of an online calculator or sales contact to estimate costs.
- Advanced fraud protection and multiple environments are Enterprise-only, unavailable on the Pay As You Go plan.
- The 7,500 free monthly active users is comparatively modest next to some competitors' free tiers.
- As a broader CIAM platform, it can be more complex to integrate than lighter-weight developer-first auth tools for smaller apps.
Pricing, plan by plan
Auth0
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 25,000 monthly active users
- Basic authentication
- Email/password login
- Essentials (B2C)$35/month
- Unlimited MAUs beyond free tier
- Multi-Factor Authentication
- Role-Based Access Control
- Professional (B2C)$240/month
- All Essentials features
- Advanced security
- Custom branding
Frontegg
Free- Pay As You GoFree
- 7,500 monthly active users included
- 5 enterprise connections (SSO/SCIM)
- Unlimited organizations
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom pricing
- Multiple environments
- Advanced fraud protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Auth0 if
- You need universal login.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want social login.
Choose Frontegg if
- You need hosted login.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want enterprise sso/scim.
Questions people ask
- Is Auth0 or Frontegg better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auth0 starts at Free and Frontegg at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auth0 or Frontegg?
- Auth0 starts at Free and Frontegg at Free.
- Does Auth0 or Frontegg run on more platforms?
- Auth0 runs on Web, iOS, Android. Frontegg runs on web, api.
- Can I use Auth0 for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Auth0 best used for?
- Auth0 is most often used for b2c authentication, b2b authentication, b2e authentication, api security. Of those, b2c authentication and b2b authentication are not what Frontegg is typically brought in for.
- What can Auth0 do that Frontegg cannot?
- Auth0 covers Universal login, Social login, Multi-factor authentication, Passwordless. Frontegg covers Hosted login, Enterprise SSO/SCIM, Multi-tenant organizations, Custom domains.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Auth0: How much does Auth0 cost?
Auth0 has a Free tier for up to 25,000 monthly active users (MAUs). Paid plans start at $35/month (Essentials B2C) and scale to $240/month (Professional B2C) and higher for Enterprise. Pricing scales with MAU usage.
SourceFrontegg: What does Frontegg cost?
Frontegg's Pay As You Go plan is free up to 7,500 monthly active users, after which pricing scales with users, enterprise connections and M2M tokens via an online calculator; Enterprise pricing is custom.
SourceAuth0: Does Auth0 include Multi-Factor Authentication?
No. MFA, RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), and premium support are not included in the free tier and require upgrading to paid Essentials plans or higher.
SourceFrontegg: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the free Pay As You Go plan includes 7,500 monthly active users, 5 enterprise SSO/SCIM connections, unlimited organizations, and a custom domain.
SourceAuth0: Is Auth0 independent or part of a larger company?
Auth0 was acquired by Okta in May 2021 for $6.5 billion. It now operates as a subsidiary business unit within Okta, but maintains its own brand and operations.
SourceFrontegg: How is usage metered?
Pricing is consumption-based, driven by monthly active users, monthly enterprise connections (SSO/SCIM), and monthly M2M tokens, with customers paying only for usage beyond the free 7,500-user threshold.
SourceAuth0: Who should use Auth0 vs Okta?
Auth0 is developer-focused and serves customer identity use cases (B2C). Okta serves workforce identity (B2B) and has broader enterprise features. Auth0 now serves both markets post-acquisition but maintains its developer-friendly positioning.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Auth0 vs Dashlane
- Auth0 vs GitLab
- Auth0 vs PostHog
- Auth0 vs Datadog
- Auth0 vs LaunchDarkly
- Auth0 vs LogRocket
- Auth0 vs Postman
- Auth0 vs Jira
- Auth0 vs Sentry
- Auth0 vs Eclipse
- Auth0 vs Docker
- Auth0 vs Supabase
- Auth0 vs Honeycomb
- Auth0 vs Istio
- Auth0 vs Lucidchart
- Auth0 vs MongoDB
- Auth0 vs Nagios XI
- Auth0 vs MongoDB Atlas
- Auth0 vs Clerk
- Auth0 vs Authelia
- Auth0 vs Akeyless
- Auth0 vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Auth0 vs 1Password
- Auth0 vs authentik
- Auth0 vs Logto
- Auth0 vs Ory Kratos
- Auth0 vs Ping Identity
- Auth0 vs Speakeasy
- Auth0 vs Doppler
- Auth0 vs Infisical
- Auth0 vs Diligent
- Auth0 vs Endor Labs
- Auth0 vs Enpass
- Auth0 vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Auth0 vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Frontegg vs Dashlane
- Frontegg vs GitLab
- Frontegg vs PostHog
- Frontegg vs Datadog
- Frontegg vs LaunchDarkly
- Frontegg vs LogRocket
- Frontegg vs Postman
- Frontegg vs Jira
- Frontegg vs Sentry
- Frontegg vs Eclipse
- Frontegg vs Docker
- Frontegg vs Supabase
- Frontegg vs Honeycomb
- Frontegg vs Istio
- Frontegg vs Lucidchart
- Frontegg vs MongoDB
- Frontegg vs Nagios XI
- Frontegg vs MongoDB Atlas
- Frontegg vs Clerk
- Frontegg vs Authelia
- Frontegg vs Akeyless
- Frontegg vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Frontegg vs 1Password
- Frontegg vs authentik
- Frontegg vs Logto
- Frontegg vs Ory Kratos
- Frontegg vs Ping Identity
- Frontegg vs Speakeasy
- Frontegg vs Doppler
- Frontegg vs Infisical
- Frontegg vs Diligent
- Frontegg vs Endor Labs
- Frontegg vs Enpass
- Frontegg vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Frontegg vs Fortinet FortiGate

