Maps · head to head
Atlas.co vs Pix4Dfields

Atlas.co
Maps
Browser-based collaborative GIS with published per-seat pricing and a free tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Atlas.co has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Atlas.co analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.; Pix4Dfields satellite imagery is sold as separate credit packages on top of the subscription, with only 100 free credits included per year
- They diverge on capability: Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Pix4Dfields covers Orthomosaic generation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlas.co and Pix4Dfields actually diverge.
| Attribute | Atlas.co | Pix4Dfields |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $330/month |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Windows, Ios |
| Category | Maps | Agriculture |
| Founded | Unknown | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlas.co
- Browser GIS
- Workflow builder
- Geocoding
- Collaboration
- Data import
- Cheap viewer seats
- Export and embed
- AI credits
Only in Pix4Dfields
- Orthomosaic generation
- NDVI & vegetation indices
- Multispectral processing
- Zonation mapping
- Prescription maps
- Stand count
- Export to machinery
- Offline processing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlas.co
- A renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no GIS analyst availablenot Pix4Dfields
- A planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only GIS licencesnot Pix4Dfields
- A consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop GIS installs across a distributed teamnot Pix4Dfields
- An analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop GISnot Pix4Dfields
Pix4Dfields
- Processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limitsnot Atlas.co
- Generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveysnot Atlas.co
- Producing variable rate prescription maps for exporting to farm machinerynot Atlas.co
- Agronomists producing crop scouting reports from drone flightsnot Atlas.co
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlas.co
- Analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.
- Geocoding and workflow runs are metered per tier, and a single large address batch can exhaust a month’s Pro allowance in one afternoon, forcing an upgrade for a one-off job.
- The company is at pre-seed stage with roughly $2m raised and a small team, so buyers embedding it in a business process carry meaningful continuity risk.
- Annual billing is required to get the advertised prices, which removes the flexibility that would otherwise make a young vendor a low-risk trial.
- There is no offline or field capability at all, so any organisation whose spatial work includes data collection needs a second tool alongside it.
Pix4Dfields
- Satellite imagery is sold as separate credit packages on top of the subscription, with only 100 free credits included per year
- Monthly billing is listed at $165.83 per month against $1,990 for a year, so paying monthly costs substantially more
- The software runs only on Windows and macOS, with no Linux build
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlas.co
Free- StarterFree
- 3 projects
- 3 editors
- 1 GB storage
- Pro$23/month
- 10 projects
- 10 GB storage
- 10,000 geocoding runs
- Team$72/month
- Unlimited projects
- Viewer seats at $7 per month
- 25,000 geocoding runs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited storage and workflows
- 100,000 geocoding runs
- White-labelled embeds
Pix4Dfields
$330/month- Monthly$330/month
- RGB & multispectral processing
- Vegetation indices
- Zonation maps
- Annual$2640/year
- Everything in Monthly
- 33% savings
- Priority support
- Perpetual$5500/one-time
- Lifetime license
- 1 year updates
- Local processing
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlas.co if
- You need browser gis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want workflow builder.
Choose Pix4Dfields if
- You need orthomosaic generation.
- You work on Windows, Ios.
- You also want ndvi & vegetation indices.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlas.co or Pix4Dfields better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlas.co starts at Free and Pix4Dfields at $330/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlas.co or Pix4Dfields?
- Atlas.co has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Atlas.co and $330/month for Pix4Dfields.
- Does Atlas.co or Pix4Dfields run on more platforms?
- Atlas.co runs on Web. Pix4Dfields runs on Windows, Ios.
- Can I use Atlas.co for free?
- Yes. Atlas.co has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Pix4Dfields starts at $330/month.
- What is Atlas.co best used for?
- Atlas.co is most often used for a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available, a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences, a consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop gis installs across a distributed team, an analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop gis. Of those, a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available and a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences are not what Pix4Dfields is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlas.co do that Pix4Dfields cannot?
- Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Workflow builder, Geocoding, Collaboration. Pix4Dfields covers Orthomosaic generation, NDVI & vegetation indices, Multispectral processing, Zonation mapping.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlas.co: How much does Atlas.co cost?
Starter is free, Pro is $23 per user per month and Team is $72 per editor per month with viewers at $7, all billed annually. Enterprise is quoted.
Pix4Dfields: How much does PIX4Dfields cost?
PIX4Dfields costs $111 per month for a monthly subscription plan. The software offers actionable data and insights from drone imagery for high efficiency and productivity in precision agriculture. Source: https://pix4d.com/pricing
SourceAtlas.co: Can it replace ArcGIS or QGIS?
For visualisation, light analysis and sharing, often yes. For raster, network or geodetic work, no.
Pix4Dfields: Does PIX4Dfields offer a free trial?
Yes, PIX4Dfields provides a free 15-day trial that requires no credit card to start. You can cancel before renewal without incurring charges, though no refunds are issued upon cancellation. Source: https://pix4d.com/pricing
SourceAtlas.co: What is the viewer seat?
A read-only seat at $7 per month on the Team plan, intended for stakeholders who consume maps rather than build them.
Pix4Dfields: Can I add cloud processing credits to PIX4Dfields?
Yes, PIX4Dfields subscriptions allow you to add cloud processing credits to your account for additional image processing beyond the standard monthly allocation. Credits can be purchased as needed. Source: https://pix4d.com/pricing
SourceAtlas.co: Where is the company based?
Oslo, Norway. It was founded in 2021 and has raised around $2m in pre-seed funding.
Atlas.co: Is there a free tier?
Yes, Starter gives three projects, three editors and 1 GB of storage with metered geocoding and workflow runs.
Related pages
More on Pix4Dfields
Other head to heads
- Atlas.co vs Esri ArcGIS
- Atlas.co vs CARTO
- Atlas.co vs QGIS
- Atlas.co vs Felt
- Atlas.co vs Correlator3D
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Atlas.co vs Global Mapper
- Atlas.co vs GRASS GIS
- Atlas.co vs Fused
- Atlas.co vs deck.gl
- Atlas.co vs Ride with GPS
- Atlas.co vs Kepler.gl
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Places API
- Atlas.co vs Geoapify
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps
- Atlas.co vs Leica Infinity
- Atlas.co vs CropX
- Atlas.co vs Granular
- Atlas.co vs AgriSync
- Atlas.co vs Bushel
- Atlas.co vs Sentera
- Atlas.co vs DroneDeploy
- Atlas.co vs FarmCommand
- Atlas.co vs Cropio
- Atlas.co vs DJI Agriculture
- Atlas.co vs OneSoil
- Atlas.co vs PrecisionHawk
- Atlas.co vs Taranis
- Atlas.co vs DTN Agriculture
- Atlas.co vs FarmERP
- Atlas.co vs FarmLogs
- Atlas.co vs Lely Horizon
- Atlas.co vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Atlas.co vs MyJohnDeere
- Pix4Dfields vs Esri ArcGIS
- Pix4Dfields vs CARTO
- Pix4Dfields vs QGIS
- Pix4Dfields vs Felt
- Pix4Dfields vs Correlator3D
- Pix4Dfields vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Pix4Dfields vs Global Mapper
- Pix4Dfields vs GRASS GIS
- Pix4Dfields vs Fused
- Pix4Dfields vs deck.gl
- Pix4Dfields vs Ride with GPS
- Pix4Dfields vs Kepler.gl
- Pix4Dfields vs Foursquare Places API
- Pix4Dfields vs Geoapify
- Pix4Dfields vs Google Maps
- Pix4Dfields vs Leica Infinity
- Pix4Dfields vs CropX
- Pix4Dfields vs Granular
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriSync
- Pix4Dfields vs Bushel
- Pix4Dfields vs Sentera
- Pix4Dfields vs DroneDeploy
- Pix4Dfields vs FarmCommand
- Pix4Dfields vs Cropio
- Pix4Dfields vs DJI Agriculture
- Pix4Dfields vs OneSoil
- Pix4Dfields vs PrecisionHawk
- Pix4Dfields vs Taranis
- Pix4Dfields vs DTN Agriculture
- Pix4Dfields vs FarmERP
- Pix4Dfields vs FarmLogs
- Pix4Dfields vs Lely Horizon
- Pix4Dfields vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Pix4Dfields vs MyJohnDeere

