Maps · head to head
Atlas.co vs Mapillary

Atlas.co
Maps
Browser-based collaborative GIS with published per-seat pricing and a free tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Mapillary
Maps
Platform for street-level imagery that crowdsources images to map the world and
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Atlas.co has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Atlas.co analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.; Mapillary no pricing information published on main website pages, suggesting either free service or hidden pricing model
- They diverge on capability: Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Mapillary covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlas.co and Mapillary actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlas.co
- Browser GIS
- Workflow builder
- Geocoding
- Collaboration
- Data import
- Cheap viewer seats
- Export and embed
- AI credits
Only in Mapillary
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlas.co
- A renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no GIS analyst availablenot Mapillary
- A planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only GIS licencesnot Mapillary
- A consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop GIS installs across a distributed teamnot Mapillary
- An analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop GISnot Mapillary
Mapillary
- Street-level imagery for map editing and verificationnot Atlas.co
- Crowdsourcing photos to keep a map currentnot Atlas.co
- Extracting map features automatically with computer visionnot Atlas.co
- Embedding street imagery with MapillaryJSnot Atlas.co
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlas.co
- Analytical depth is a long way short of a mature GIS: there is no serious raster analysis, network analysis, topology editing or geodetic control, so complex work still goes back to QGIS or ArcGIS.
- Geocoding and workflow runs are metered per tier, and a single large address batch can exhaust a month’s Pro allowance in one afternoon, forcing an upgrade for a one-off job.
- The company is at pre-seed stage with roughly $2m raised and a small team, so buyers embedding it in a business process carry meaningful continuity risk.
- Annual billing is required to get the advertised prices, which removes the flexibility that would otherwise make a young vendor a low-risk trial.
- There is no offline or field capability at all, so any organisation whose spatial work includes data collection needs a second tool alongside it.
Mapillary
- No pricing information published on main website pages, suggesting either free service or hidden pricing model
- Unclear monetization strategy makes it difficult for businesses to understand licensing costs for commercial use
- No published tier structure or feature limits visible to potential customers
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlas.co
Free- StarterFree
- 3 projects
- 3 editors
- 1 GB storage
- Pro$23/month
- 10 projects
- 10 GB storage
- 10,000 geocoding runs
- Team$72/month
- Unlimited projects
- Viewer seats at $7 per month
- 25,000 geocoding runs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited storage and workflows
- 100,000 geocoding runs
- White-labelled embeds
Mapillary
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Mapillary review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlas.co if
- You need browser gis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want workflow builder.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlas.co or Mapillary better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlas.co starts at Free and Mapillary at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlas.co or Mapillary?
- Atlas.co has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Atlas.co and On request for Mapillary.
- Does Atlas.co or Mapillary run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Atlas.co for free?
- Yes. Atlas.co has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Mapillary starts at On request.
- What is Atlas.co best used for?
- Atlas.co is most often used for a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available, a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences, a consultancy producing client-facing maps and embeds without maintaining desktop gis installs across a distributed team, an analyst with an address spreadsheet who needs geocoding, buffering and a shareable map without learning a desktop gis. Of those, a renewables developer screening sites against constraint layers who needs an answer this afternoon and has no gis analyst available and a planning or property team that mainly needs colleagues to view and comment on maps, where $7 viewer seats replace expensive read-only gis licences are not what Mapillary is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlas.co do that Mapillary cannot?
- Atlas.co covers Browser GIS, Workflow builder, Geocoding, Collaboration. Mapillary covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlas.co: How much does Atlas.co cost?
Starter is free, Pro is $23 per user per month and Team is $72 per editor per month with viewers at $7, all billed annually. Enterprise is quoted.
Mapillary: What is the pricing model for Mapillary?
Mapillary does not publish pricing information on its main website pages. The platform focuses on features like street-level imagery access, map updating through computer vision, and open data sharing, but specific costs and licensing tiers are not disclosed publicly.
SourceAtlas.co: Can it replace ArcGIS or QGIS?
For visualisation, light analysis and sharing, often yes. For raster, network or geodetic work, no.
Mapillary: Can I use Mapillary for commercial purposes?
Specific details about commercial licensing for Mapillary are not published on the main website. Interested businesses should contact Mapillary directly through their support channels to discuss commercial use cases and licensing options.
SourceAtlas.co: What is the viewer seat?
A read-only seat at $7 per month on the Team plan, intended for stakeholders who consume maps rather than build them.
Mapillary: Is Mapillary free to use for individual contributors?
Mapillary emphasizes open data sharing and community contributions but specific details about free vs. paid access for individuals are not clearly stated on the main website. Contact Mapillary support for clarification on access terms.
SourceAtlas.co: Where is the company based?
Oslo, Norway. It was founded in 2021 and has raised around $2m in pre-seed funding.
Atlas.co: Is there a free tier?
Yes, Starter gives three projects, three editors and 1 GB of storage with metered geocoding and workflow runs.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Atlas.co vs Esri ArcGIS
- Atlas.co vs CARTO
- Atlas.co vs QGIS
- Atlas.co vs Felt
- Atlas.co vs Correlator3D
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Atlas.co vs Global Mapper
- Atlas.co vs GRASS GIS
- Atlas.co vs Fused
- Atlas.co vs deck.gl
- Atlas.co vs Ride with GPS
- Atlas.co vs Kepler.gl
- Atlas.co vs Foursquare Places API
- Atlas.co vs Geoapify
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps
- Atlas.co vs Leica Infinity
- Atlas.co vs Mapbox
- Atlas.co vs Google Maps Platform
- Atlas.co vs HERE Technologies
- Atlas.co vs Apple Maps
- Atlas.co vs Bing Maps
- Atlas.co vs CesiumJS
- Atlas.co vs AllTrails
- Atlas.co vs Gaia GPS
- Atlas.co vs Emlid Studio
- Atlas.co vs Trailforks
- Atlas.co vs Cesium ion
- Atlas.co vs Citymapper
- Mapillary vs Esri ArcGIS
- Mapillary vs CARTO
- Mapillary vs QGIS
- Mapillary vs Felt
- Mapillary vs Correlator3D
- Mapillary vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Mapillary vs Global Mapper
- Mapillary vs GRASS GIS
- Mapillary vs Fused
- Mapillary vs deck.gl
- Mapillary vs Ride with GPS
- Mapillary vs Kepler.gl
- Mapillary vs Foursquare Places API
- Mapillary vs Geoapify
- Mapillary vs Google Maps
- Mapillary vs Leica Infinity
- Mapillary vs Mapbox
- Mapillary vs Google Maps Platform
- Mapillary vs HERE Technologies
- Mapillary vs Apple Maps
- Mapillary vs Bing Maps
- Mapillary vs CesiumJS
- Mapillary vs AllTrails
- Mapillary vs Gaia GPS
- Mapillary vs Emlid Studio
- Mapillary vs Trailforks
- Mapillary vs Cesium ion
- Mapillary vs Citymapper
