Developer Tools · head to head
Atlantis vs Burp Suite

Atlantis
Developer Tools
Runs Terraform plan and apply from pull request comments, self-hosted and free
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Burp Suite
Cybersecurity
The leading toolkit for web security testing
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Atlantis there is no company, no service level agreement and no paid support at any price, and the six maintainers are volunteers with day jobs, which some risk committees will not accept for a component holding production cloud credentials.; Burp Suite the automated vulnerability scanner is Professional only, at $499; the free Community edition is manual tools
- They diverge on capability: Atlantis covers Pull request plans, Burp Suite covers Web vulnerability scanner.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlantis and Burp Suite actually diverge.
| Attribute | Atlantis | Burp Suite |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Desktop, Api |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 2004 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlantis
- Pull request plans
- Comment driven apply
- Workspace locking
- Policy checking
- Multi-platform webhooks
- Custom workflows
Only in Burp Suite
- Web vulnerability scanner
- Proxy interceptor
- Intruder
- Repeater
- Sequencer
- Decoder
- Comparer
- Logger
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlantis
- Making Terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approvernot Burp Suite
- Removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keysnot Burp Suite
- Getting pull request driven infrastructure without paying a per-user subscription for a hosted platformnot Burp Suite
- Enforcing Conftest policies as a blocking check before an apply can runnot Burp Suite
Burp Suite
- Manual web application penetration testing through an intercepting proxynot Atlantis
- Automated scanning for web vulnerabilities on the Professional editionnot Atlantis
- Extending testing with community-built BApp extensionsnot Atlantis
- Enterprise-wide dynamic scanning through Burp DASTnot Atlantis
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlantis
- There is no company, no service level agreement and no paid support at any price, and the six maintainers are volunteers with day jobs, which some risk committees will not accept for a component holding production cloud credentials.
- The security surface is inherently sharp, because it is an internet-reachable webhook endpoint that executes applies with privileged credentials, gated by pull request comment authorisation that is coarse next to a real policy engine.
- It is stateful, holding a working directory and lock database on local disk, so high availability and horizontal scaling are awkward and you own upgrades, webhook plumbing, secret rotation and the host itself.
- It lacks the features that distinguish the commercial alternatives, with no native drift detection, no cost estimation, no managed state interface and no policy engine beyond the Conftest integration.
- Terragrunt and monorepo layouts are not first-class, requiring hand-written custom workflows and repository configuration that becomes a growing maintenance burden as the number of repositories increases.
Burp Suite
- The automated vulnerability scanner is Professional only, at $499; the free Community edition is manual tools
- BApp Store extensions require the Professional edition
- DAST and the agentic testing product are separate enterprise offerings with no published price
- Professional is licensed per user per year rather than perpetually
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlantis
Free- AtlantisFree
- Apache-2.0, no usage limits and no seat count
- No commercial edition and no paid support tier
- Community support through GitHub and the CNCF Slack channel
Burp Suite
Free- Community EditionFree
- Essential manual tools
- Proxy
- Repeater
- Professional$449/year
- All Community features
- Burp Scanner
- Advanced manual tools
- Enterprise$6995/year
- CI/CD integration
- Scheduled scans
- Role-based access
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlantis if
- You need pull request plans.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want comment driven apply.
Choose Burp Suite if
- You need web vulnerability scanner.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Api.
- You also want proxy interceptor.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlantis or Burp Suite better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlantis starts at Free and Burp Suite at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlantis or Burp Suite?
- Atlantis starts at Free and Burp Suite at Free.
- Does Atlantis or Burp Suite run on more platforms?
- Atlantis runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Burp Suite runs on Desktop, Api.
- Can I use Atlantis for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Atlantis best used for?
- Atlantis is most often used for making terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approver, removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keys, getting pull request driven infrastructure without paying a per-user subscription for a hosted platform, enforcing conftest policies as a blocking check before an apply can run. Of those, making terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approver and removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keys are not what Burp Suite is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlantis do that Burp Suite cannot?
- Atlantis covers Pull request plans, Comment driven apply, Workspace locking, Policy checking. Burp Suite covers Web vulnerability scanner, Proxy interceptor, Intruder, Repeater.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlantis: Is there a company behind Atlantis?
No. It runs as a series of LF Projects under the Linux Foundation and is maintained by volunteers. There is no vendor to buy support from and no service level agreement.
Burp Suite: Does Burp Suite offer a free version?
Yes, Burp Suite Community Edition is available free and supports manual testing. The page does not provide specific details on additional paid editions or their pricing.
SourceAtlantis: Is it a CNCF project?
No. It uses a channel in the CNCF Slack, which is often misread as membership, but the project sits under LF Projects rather than the CNCF.
Burp Suite: What features are available in the free edition?
Burp Suite Community Edition supports manual security testing, though specific feature limitations compared to paid editions are not detailed on this page. Visit individual product pages for detailed tier comparisons.
SourceAtlantis: Does it work with OpenTofu?
Yes, there is a dedicated integration guide alongside Terraform, and it also has configuration for working with hosted Terraform backends.
Burp Suite: Are paid versions of Burp Suite available?
Yes, PortSwigger offers Burp Suite Professional and Burp Suite DAST as paid products, though specific pricing and feature details are not available on the main product page.
SourceAtlantis: What does it not do that a paid platform does?
Drift detection, cost estimation, a managed state and run interface, and a real policy engine. Atlantis does pull request plan and apply well and stops there.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Atlantis vs Spacelift
- Atlantis vs HCP Terraform
- Atlantis vs Harness
- Atlantis vs Jitsu
- Atlantis vs Visual Studio Code
- Atlantis vs Tilt
- Atlantis vs Soketi
- Atlantis vs Pants Build
- Atlantis vs Steampipe
- Atlantis vs Refact
- Atlantis vs Penpot
- Atlantis vs GNU Emacs
- Atlantis vs JFrog Artifactory
- Atlantis vs Namespace
- Atlantis vs Nix
- Atlantis vs Nixpacks
- Atlantis vs Octopus Deploy
- Atlantis vs Okteto
- Atlantis vs 1Password
- Atlantis vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Atlantis vs Norton 360
- Atlantis vs LastPass
- Atlantis vs Metasploit
- Atlantis vs Acunetix
- Atlantis vs OWASP ZAP
- Atlantis vs Nessus
- Atlantis vs BigID
- Atlantis vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Atlantis vs LogicManager
- Atlantis vs Mullvad VPN
- Atlantis vs Private Internet Access
- Atlantis vs Quantexa
- Atlantis vs Termly
- Atlantis vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Atlantis vs Tenable Nessus
- Burp Suite vs Spacelift
- Burp Suite vs HCP Terraform
- Burp Suite vs Harness
- Burp Suite vs Jitsu
- Burp Suite vs Visual Studio Code
- Burp Suite vs Tilt
- Burp Suite vs Soketi
- Burp Suite vs Pants Build
- Burp Suite vs Steampipe
- Burp Suite vs Refact
- Burp Suite vs Penpot
- Burp Suite vs GNU Emacs
- Burp Suite vs JFrog Artifactory
- Burp Suite vs Namespace
- Burp Suite vs Nix
- Burp Suite vs Nixpacks
- Burp Suite vs Octopus Deploy
- Burp Suite vs Okteto
- Burp Suite vs 1Password
- Burp Suite vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Burp Suite vs Norton 360
- Burp Suite vs LastPass
- Burp Suite vs Metasploit
- Burp Suite vs Acunetix
- Burp Suite vs OWASP ZAP
- Burp Suite vs Nessus
- Burp Suite vs BigID
- Burp Suite vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Burp Suite vs LogicManager
- Burp Suite vs Mullvad VPN
- Burp Suite vs Private Internet Access
- Burp Suite vs Quantexa
- Burp Suite vs Termly
- Burp Suite vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Burp Suite vs Tenable Nessus
