Web Development · head to head
Astro vs Mmhmm

Astro
Web Development
Web framework for content-driven sites shipping minimal JavaScript by default
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Astro has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Astro limited to static site generation and server-side rendering; real-time applications requiring constant client-server communication are unsuitable; Mmhmm renamed to Airtime and split into four separate tools, Camera, Recorder, Creator and Stacks, rather than the single app the mmhmm name refers to
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Astro and Mmhmm actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Astro
Nothing recorded that Mmhmm does not also cover.
Only in Mmhmm
- Custom layouts
- Screen sharing
- Virtual backgrounds
- Picture-in-picture
- Recording
- Zoom
- Google Meet
- Microsoft Teams
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Astro
- Marketing websites and landing pages prioritising performance and SEOnot Mmhmm
- Documentation and blog platforms with high page volumesnot Mmhmm
- E-commerce storefronts where page speed affects conversion ratesnot Mmhmm
- Portfolio and personal websites showcasing static content with minimal interactivitynot Mmhmm
- Multi-language sites requiring efficient content management and translationnot Mmhmm
- JAMstack projects integrating headless CMS platforms (Contentful, Sanity, Strapi)not Mmhmm
Mmhmm
- Putting a presenter on screen over slides during a video callnot Astro
- Recording a screen walkthrough up to an hournot Astro
- Adding effects and reactions to a webcam feednot Astro
- Collecting materials for a meeting in a shared stacknot Astro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Astro
- Limited to static site generation and server-side rendering; real-time applications requiring constant client-server communication are unsuitable
- Smaller ecosystem compared to Next.js; fewer third-party component libraries and integrations readily available
- Build time increases with large content volumes (1,000+ pages); incremental builds not yet as optimised as Gatsby or Next.js
- API routes and serverless functions are less mature than Next.js; complex backend integrations require additional tooling
Mmhmm
- Renamed to Airtime and split into four separate tools, Camera, Recorder, Creator and Stacks, rather than the single app the mmhmm name refers to
- Screen recordings are capped at one hour
- Windows support requires Windows 10 or 11
- Pricing is not shown on the product pages
Pricing, plan by plan
Astro
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Astro review.
Mmhmm
$10/month- Individual$10/month
- Single user
- Unlimited meetings and recordings
- No storage or time limits
- Individual Annual$120/year
- Single user
- 17% savings vs monthly billing
- Team$10/month
- Per-seat billing
- Admin dashboard
- Centralized billing
- Team Annual$120/year
- Per-seat billing
- 17% savings vs monthly
Which should you pick?
Choose Astro if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Node.js, Cloudflare, Vercel, Netlify, AWS, Deno.
Choose Mmhmm if
- You need custom layouts.
- You work on Desktop Mac, Desktop Windows.
- You also want screen sharing.
Questions people ask
- Is Astro or Mmhmm better?
- Neither clearly leads. Astro starts at Free and Mmhmm at $10/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Astro or Mmhmm?
- Astro has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Astro and $10/month for Mmhmm.
- Does Astro or Mmhmm run on more platforms?
- Astro runs on Web, Node.js, Cloudflare, Vercel, Netlify, AWS, Deno. Mmhmm runs on Desktop Mac, Desktop Windows.
- Can I use Astro for free?
- Yes. Astro has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Mmhmm starts at $10/month.
- What is Astro best used for?
- Astro is most often used for marketing websites and landing pages prioritising performance and seo, documentation and blog platforms with high page volumes, e-commerce storefronts where page speed affects conversion rates, portfolio and personal websites showcasing static content with minimal interactivity. Of those, marketing websites and landing pages prioritising performance and seo and documentation and blog platforms with high page volumes are not what Mmhmm is typically brought in for.
- What can Astro do that Mmhmm cannot?
- Mmhmm covers Custom layouts, Screen sharing, Virtual backgrounds, Picture-in-picture.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Astro: Is Astro free?
Yes. Astro is free and open-source under MIT licence. Deployment hosting (Vercel, Netlify, Cloudflare, AWS) may incur costs depending on usage.
SourceMmhmm: How much does Airtime cost?
Airtime (formerly mmhmm) costs 10 USD/month for Individual plan or 120 USD/year with annual billing providing 17% savings. Team plans also charge 10 USD per seat per month or 120 USD per seat per year.
SourceAstro: Can I use React components in Astro?
Yes. Astro supports React, Vue, Svelte, Preact, and Solid components. Components are server-rendered by default; add client: directives to enable client-side interactivity only where needed.
SourceMmhmm: Is there a free trial?
Yes, a 14-day free trial is available with full access to Creator, Camera, and Stacks. Recorder feature is limited to 5 recordings of 5 minutes each during trial. No credit card required.
SourceAstro: How does Astro compare to Next.js for performance?
Astro achieves superior Core Web Vitals scores (66% pass rate vs Next.js 30%) by shipping minimal JavaScript. Next.js defaults to client-side rendering; Astro renders on the server by default.
SourceMmhmm: What are the seat limits?
Individual plan supports single user; Team plan uses per-seat billing with volume discounts available for 20+ users under Enterprise plan.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Astro vs Next.js
- Astro vs Django
- Astro vs MySQL
- Astro vs Flask
- Astro vs React
- Astro vs Vue.js
- Astro vs Tailwind CSS
- Astro vs Docusaurus
- Astro vs Laravel
- Astro vs MUI
- Astro vs Nginx
- Astro vs Remix
- Astro vs esbuild
- Astro vs npm
- Astro vs SolidStart
- Astro vs TanStack Start
- Astro vs Alpine.js
- Astro vs Carrd
- Astro vs Make
- Astro vs HubSpot CRM
- Astro vs Fireflies.ai
- Astro vs Gather
- Astro vs IFTTT
- Astro vs Otter.ai
- Astro vs tl;dv
- Astro vs Vidyard
- Astro vs ConnectWise
- Astro vs Grain
- Astro vs Kaseya VSA
- Astro vs Krisp
- Astro vs Monday Sales CRM
- Astro vs Mural
- Astro vs N-able N-central
- Astro vs Pop
- Astro vs Slack Workflow Builder
- Astro vs Splashtop
- Mmhmm vs Next.js
- Mmhmm vs Django
- Mmhmm vs MySQL
- Mmhmm vs Flask
- Mmhmm vs React
- Mmhmm vs Vue.js
- Mmhmm vs Tailwind CSS
- Mmhmm vs Docusaurus
- Mmhmm vs Laravel
- Mmhmm vs MUI
- Mmhmm vs Nginx
- Mmhmm vs Remix
- Mmhmm vs esbuild
- Mmhmm vs npm
- Mmhmm vs SolidStart
- Mmhmm vs TanStack Start
- Mmhmm vs Alpine.js
- Mmhmm vs Carrd
- Mmhmm vs Make
- Mmhmm vs HubSpot CRM
- Mmhmm vs Fireflies.ai
- Mmhmm vs Gather
- Mmhmm vs IFTTT
- Mmhmm vs Otter.ai
- Mmhmm vs tl;dv
- Mmhmm vs Vidyard
- Mmhmm vs ConnectWise
- Mmhmm vs Grain
- Mmhmm vs Kaseya VSA
- Mmhmm vs Krisp
- Mmhmm vs Monday Sales CRM
- Mmhmm vs Mural
- Mmhmm vs N-able N-central
- Mmhmm vs Pop
- Mmhmm vs Slack Workflow Builder
- Mmhmm vs Splashtop

