Software · head to head
Assistant.to vs Tana
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Assistant.to no longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it; Tana the free plan hosts only 5 meetings a month with AI transcripts and summaries
- They diverge on capability: Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, Tana covers Outliner interface.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Assistant.to and Tana actually diverge.
| Attribute | Assistant.to | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Chrome-extension | Web, Desktop |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Assistant.to
- In-email scheduling
- One-click booking
- Google Calendar sync
- Time zone handling
- Simple interface
- Gmail
- Google Calendar
- Chrome-extension support
Only in Tana
- Outliner interface
- Supertags
- Live queries
- AI integration
- Graph views
- Email capture
- API
- Zapier
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Assistant.to
- Schedulingnot Tana
- Appointment bookingnot Tana
- Time trackingnot Tana
- Resource managementnot Tana
- Team coordinationnot Tana
Tana
- Structured note taking with a graph based supertag data modelnot Assistant.to
- Automatic meeting capture with AI transcripts and summariesnot Assistant.to
- Turning notes into queryable structured databasesnot Assistant.to
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Assistant.to
- No longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it
- Its scheduling now sits inside a wider Salesforce-focused sales tool rather than being a standalone add-in
Tana
- The free plan hosts only 5 meetings a month with AI transcripts and summaries
- The free plan connects only 1 calendar and allows 50 AI queries
- Pro is $30 per user per month at standard price, with $20 shown as an early bird rate
- Max is $120 per user per month at standard price, with $80 shown as an early bird rate
- Integrations and full MCP require the Pro plan
- Dedicated support and onboarding, and unlimited agents, skills and types, require the Max plan
- The Business plan is custom priced, billed yearly and has no published rate
- The free trial runs 30 days
Pricing, plan by plan
Assistant.to
Free- FreeFree
- In-email scheduling
- Basic features
- Pro$5/month
- Team features
- Custom branding
- Priority support
Tana
Free- FreeFree
- Core features
- Supertags
- Searches
- Pro$10/month
- Advanced AI
- Priority support
- Extended history
Which should you pick?
Choose Assistant.to if
- You need in-email scheduling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome-extension.
- You also want one-click booking.
Choose Tana if
- You need outliner interface.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop.
- You also want supertags.
Questions people ask
- Is Assistant.to or Tana better?
- Neither clearly leads. Assistant.to starts at Free and Tana at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Assistant.to or Tana?
- Assistant.to starts at Free and Tana at Free.
- Does Assistant.to or Tana run on more platforms?
- Assistant.to runs on Chrome-extension. Tana runs on Web, Desktop.
- Can I use Assistant.to for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Assistant.to best used for?
- Assistant.to is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what Tana is typically brought in for.
- What can Assistant.to do that Tana cannot?
- Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, One-click booking, Google Calendar sync, Time zone handling. Tana covers Outliner interface, Supertags, Live queries, AI integration.
Related pages
More on Assistant.to
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Assistant.to vs Google Calendar
- Assistant.to vs Apple Calendar
- Assistant.to vs Fantastical
- Assistant.to vs Clockify
- Assistant.to vs Microsoft To Do
- Assistant.to vs OmniFocus
- Assistant.to vs Amie
- Assistant.to vs Outlook Calendar
- Assistant.to vs Float
- Assistant.to vs Google Tasks
- Assistant.to vs YouCanBook.me
- Assistant.to vs Cron Calendar
- Assistant.to vs Harvest Forecast
- Assistant.to vs Resource Guru
- Assistant.to vs SavvyCal
- Assistant.to vs Skedda
- Assistant.to vs Timepage
- Assistant.to vs Woven
- Assistant.to vs Todoist
- Assistant.to vs Things 3
- Assistant.to vs OmniFocus 3
- Assistant.to vs Brain.fm
- Assistant.to vs TickTick
- Assistant.to vs Akiflow
- Assistant.to vs Any.do
- Assistant.to vs Focus@Will
- Assistant.to vs Forest
- Assistant.to vs Google Workspace
- Assistant.to vs Hubstaff
- Assistant.to vs Remember The Milk
- Assistant.to vs Structured
- Assistant.to vs Time Doctor
- Assistant.to vs 7-Zip
- Assistant.to vs Bear
- Assistant.to vs Bear Notes
- Assistant.to vs BoldSign
- Tana vs Google Calendar
- Tana vs Apple Calendar
- Tana vs Fantastical
- Tana vs Clockify
- Tana vs Microsoft To Do
- Tana vs OmniFocus
- Tana vs Amie
- Tana vs Outlook Calendar
- Tana vs Float
- Tana vs Google Tasks
- Tana vs YouCanBook.me
- Tana vs Cron Calendar
- Tana vs Harvest Forecast
- Tana vs Resource Guru
- Tana vs SavvyCal
- Tana vs Skedda
- Tana vs Timepage
- Tana vs Woven
- Tana vs Todoist
- Tana vs Things 3
- Tana vs OmniFocus 3
- Tana vs Brain.fm
- Tana vs TickTick
- Tana vs Akiflow
- Tana vs Any.do
- Tana vs Focus@Will
- Tana vs Forest
- Tana vs Google Workspace
- Tana vs Hubstaff
- Tana vs Remember The Milk
- Tana vs Structured
- Tana vs Time Doctor
- Tana vs 7-Zip
- Tana vs Bear
- Tana vs Bear Notes
- Tana vs BoldSign


