Softwr

Software · head to head

Assistant.to vs Bear

Assistant.to logo

Assistant.to

Software

The easiest way to schedule meetings

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Bear logo

Bear

Software

Markdown notes for Apple devices

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Assistant.to has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Assistant.to no longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it; Bear built for Apple hardware only, with no Windows, Android or web client

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Assistant.to and Bear actually diverge.

Attributes where Assistant.to and Bear differ
AttributeAssistant.toBear
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelfreemiumsubscription
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsChrome-extensionWeb
Founded2014Unknown

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Assistant.to

  • In-email scheduling
  • One-click booking
  • Google Calendar sync
  • Time zone handling
  • Simple interface
  • Gmail
  • Google Calendar
  • Chrome-extension support

Only in Bear

Nothing recorded that Assistant.to does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Assistant.to

  • Schedulingnot Bear
  • Appointment bookingnot Bear
  • Time trackingnot Bear
  • Resource managementnot Bear
  • Team coordinationnot Bear

Bear

No use cases recorded yet. See the Bear review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Assistant.to

  • No longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it
  • Its scheduling now sits inside a wider Salesforce-focused sales tool rather than being a standalone add-in

Bear

  • Built for Apple hardware only, with no Windows, Android or web client
  • Free tier is limited to 3 themes, 1 app icon and restricted export formats; iCloud sync requires Bear Pro
  • Bear Pro is $2.99 per month or $29.99 per year after a 7 day free trial

Pricing, plan by plan

Assistant.to

Free
  • FreeFree
    • In-email scheduling
    • Basic features
  • Pro$5/month
    • Team features
    • Custom branding
    • Priority support

Bear

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Bear review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Assistant.to if

  • You need in-email scheduling.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Chrome-extension.
  • You also want one-click booking.
Assistant.to review

Choose Bear if

Nothing in the data separates Bear from Assistant.to on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Bear review

Questions people ask

Is Assistant.to or Bear better?
Neither clearly leads. Assistant.to starts at Free and Bear at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Assistant.to or Bear?
Assistant.to has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Assistant.to and On request for Bear.
Does Assistant.to or Bear run on more platforms?
Assistant.to runs on Chrome-extension. Bear runs on Web.
Can I use Assistant.to for free?
Yes. Assistant.to has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Bear starts at On request.
What is Assistant.to best used for?
Assistant.to is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what Bear is typically brought in for.
What can Assistant.to do that Bear cannot?
Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, One-click booking, Google Calendar sync, Time zone handling.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Assistant.to

More on Bear

Keep looking

Other head to heads