Cybersecurity · head to head
Arnica vs Cilium

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Cilium
Cloud
eBPF-based networking, observability and security for Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers; Cilium requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- They diverge on capability: Arnica covers AI SAST, Cilium covers eBPF datapath.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arnica and Cilium actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
Only in Cilium
- eBPF datapath
- Identity-based policy
- Hubble observability
- Sidecar-free mesh
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot Cilium
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot Cilium
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot Cilium
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot Cilium
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot Cilium
Cilium
- Kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based CNI performance degradesnot Arnica
- Network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile IP rulesnot Arnica
- Seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is droppingnot Arnica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
Cilium
- Requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- eBPF is genuinely hard to debug when it misbehaves, and the skill is rare on most teams
- Broad scope — CNI, policy, mesh, observability — means the learning curve covers several domains at once
Pricing, plan by plan
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
Cilium
Free- CiliumFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Choose Cilium if
- You need ebpf datapath.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want identity-based policy.
Questions people ask
- Is Arnica or Cilium better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arnica starts at Free and Cilium at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arnica or Cilium?
- Arnica starts at Free and Cilium at Free.
- Does Arnica or Cilium run on more platforms?
- Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE. Cilium runs on Kubernetes, Linux.
- Can I use Arnica for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Arnica best used for?
- Arnica is most often used for detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions, finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production, mapping container vulnerabilities back to source code, generating sbom for supply chain compliance requirements. Of those, detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions and finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production are not what Cilium is typically brought in for.
- What can Arnica do that Cilium cannot?
- Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning. Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Identity-based policy, Hubble observability, Sidecar-free mesh.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
SourceCilium: Is Cilium free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Isovalent sells an enterprise distribution and support.
Arnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
SourceCilium: What does eBPF change?
It lets Cilium run packet-processing programs inside the kernel instead of relying on iptables rule chains, which behave poorly as the number of services grows.
Arnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
SourceCilium: Does Cilium replace a service mesh?
It can cover much of what a mesh does without sidecars, though full mesh feature sets still favour Istio or Linkerd.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Arnica vs Semgrep
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Chainguard
- Arnica vs Tenable
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Aikido
- Arnica vs Endor Labs
- Arnica vs Trivy
- Arnica vs Socket
- Arnica vs Infisical
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs RoboForm
- Arnica vs Sardine
- Arnica vs Semperis
- Arnica vs SentinelOne
- Arnica vs Shufti Pro
- Arnica vs Nessus
- Arnica vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Arnica vs Podman
- Arnica vs K3s
- Arnica vs Akamai
- Arnica vs Crossplane
- Arnica vs OpenEBS
- Arnica vs DigitalOcean
- Arnica vs Portworx
- Arnica vs Vault
- Arnica vs Fastly
- Arnica vs HAProxy
- Arnica vs Hetzner Cloud
- Arnica vs Infracost
- Arnica vs Lambda
- Arnica vs Linode
- Arnica vs Northflank
- Arnica vs Oracle Cloud
- Arnica vs Buildah
- Arnica vs Rancher
- Cilium vs Semgrep
- Cilium vs Snyk
- Cilium vs Chainguard
- Cilium vs Tenable
- Cilium vs Doppler
- Cilium vs Aikido
- Cilium vs Endor Labs
- Cilium vs Trivy
- Cilium vs Socket
- Cilium vs Infisical
- Cilium vs Bitwarden
- Cilium vs RoboForm
- Cilium vs Sardine
- Cilium vs Semperis
- Cilium vs SentinelOne
- Cilium vs Shufti Pro
- Cilium vs Nessus
- Cilium vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Cilium vs Podman
- Cilium vs K3s
- Cilium vs Akamai
- Cilium vs Crossplane
- Cilium vs OpenEBS
- Cilium vs DigitalOcean
- Cilium vs Portworx
- Cilium vs Vault
- Cilium vs Fastly
- Cilium vs HAProxy
- Cilium vs Hetzner Cloud
- Cilium vs Infracost
- Cilium vs Lambda
- Cilium vs Linode
- Cilium vs Northflank
- Cilium vs Oracle Cloud
- Cilium vs Buildah
- Cilium vs Rancher
