Cloud · head to head
Cilium vs Infisical

Cilium
Cloud
eBPF-based networking, observability and security for Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Infisical
Cybersecurity
Security infrastructure for developers and AI agents
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cilium requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments; Infisical free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- They diverge on capability: Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Infisical covers Secrets management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cilium and Infisical actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cilium
- eBPF datapath
- Identity-based policy
- Hubble observability
- Sidecar-free mesh
Only in Infisical
- Secrets management
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Secret versioning
- Dynamic secrets
- SAML SSO
- Open-source core
- Secrets scanning
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cilium
- Kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based CNI performance degradesnot Infisical
- Network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile IP rulesnot Infisical
- Seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is droppingnot Infisical
Infisical
- Managing secrets across Kubernetes clustersnot Cilium
- Automating certificate lifecycle for internal PKInot Cilium
- Providing privileged database access with audit trailsnot Cilium
- Securing credentials for AI agents at runtimenot Cilium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cilium
- Requires a recent Linux kernel, which rules out older distributions and some managed environments
- eBPF is genuinely hard to debug when it misbehaves, and the skill is rare on most teams
- Broad scope — CNI, policy, mesh, observability — means the learning curve covers several domains at once
Infisical
- Free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- Pricing tiers are per-identity, which scales costs with team size
- Certificate management requires Enterprise plan for advanced features like wildcards
- Privileged access tier is separate billing from secrets management
Pricing, plan by plan
Cilium
Free- CiliumFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Infisical
Free- FreeFree
- 5 identities
- Unlimited projects
- 3 environments
- Pro - Secrets$20/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Pro - Secrets (Annual)$20/year
- Annual discount available
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Advanced - Secrets$40/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Dynamic secrets
- Gateways
Which should you pick?
Choose Cilium if
- You need ebpf datapath.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux.
- You also want identity-based policy.
Choose Infisical if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- You also want certificate management.
Questions people ask
- Is Cilium or Infisical better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cilium starts at Free and Infisical at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cilium or Infisical?
- Cilium starts at Free and Infisical at Free.
- Does Cilium or Infisical run on more platforms?
- Cilium runs on Kubernetes, Linux. Infisical runs on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- Can I use Cilium for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cilium best used for?
- Cilium is most often used for kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades, network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules, seeing which services actually talk to each other, and what policy is dropping. Of those, kubernetes networking at a scale where iptables-based cni performance degrades and network policy expressed on workload identity rather than fragile ip rules are not what Infisical is typically brought in for.
- What can Cilium do that Infisical cannot?
- Cilium covers eBPF datapath, Identity-based policy, Hubble observability, Sidecar-free mesh. Infisical covers Secrets management, Certificate management, Privileged access management, Secret versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cilium: Is Cilium free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Isovalent sells an enterprise distribution and support.
Infisical: How is pricing calculated for Secrets Management?
Pricing is per-identity per month. Free tier includes 5 identities. Pro tier is $20/identity/month, Advanced is $40/identity/month. All pricing in USD.
SourceCilium: What does eBPF change?
It lets Cilium run packet-processing programs inside the kernel instead of relying on iptables rule chains, which behave poorly as the number of services grows.
Infisical: Can I self-host Infisical?
Yes, Infisical's core is open-source under the MIT license and can be self-hosted. The managed cloud service is also available with additional features.
SourceCilium: Does Cilium replace a service mesh?
It can cover much of what a mesh does without sidecars, though full mesh feature sets still favour Istio or Linkerd.
Infisical: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise plan includes SCIM, LDAP, approval workflows, external KMS/HSM support, and 99.99% SLA. Pricing is custom and determined by annual commitment.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cilium vs Podman
- Cilium vs K3s
- Cilium vs Akamai
- Cilium vs Crossplane
- Cilium vs OpenEBS
- Cilium vs DigitalOcean
- Cilium vs Portworx
- Cilium vs Vault
- Cilium vs Fastly
- Cilium vs HAProxy
- Cilium vs Hetzner Cloud
- Cilium vs Infracost
- Cilium vs Lambda
- Cilium vs Linode
- Cilium vs Northflank
- Cilium vs Oracle Cloud
- Cilium vs Buildah
- Cilium vs Rancher
- Cilium vs Akeyless
- Cilium vs Doppler
- Cilium vs HashiCorp Vault
- Cilium vs Chainguard
- Cilium vs Authelia
- Cilium vs Bitwarden
- Cilium vs Delinea
- Cilium vs Semgrep
- Cilium vs Trivy
- Cilium vs Grype
- Cilium vs Ory Kratos
- Cilium vs Legit Security
- Cilium vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Cilium vs Metasploit
- Cilium vs MetricStream
- Cilium vs Microsoft Defender
- Cilium vs Ory
- Cilium vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Infisical vs Podman
- Infisical vs K3s
- Infisical vs Akamai
- Infisical vs Crossplane
- Infisical vs OpenEBS
- Infisical vs DigitalOcean
- Infisical vs Portworx
- Infisical vs Vault
- Infisical vs Fastly
- Infisical vs HAProxy
- Infisical vs Hetzner Cloud
- Infisical vs Infracost
- Infisical vs Lambda
- Infisical vs Linode
- Infisical vs Northflank
- Infisical vs Oracle Cloud
- Infisical vs Buildah
- Infisical vs Rancher
- Infisical vs Akeyless
- Infisical vs Doppler
- Infisical vs HashiCorp Vault
- Infisical vs Chainguard
- Infisical vs Authelia
- Infisical vs Bitwarden
- Infisical vs Delinea
- Infisical vs Semgrep
- Infisical vs Trivy
- Infisical vs Grype
- Infisical vs Ory Kratos
- Infisical vs Legit Security
- Infisical vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Infisical vs Metasploit
- Infisical vs MetricStream
- Infisical vs Microsoft Defender
- Infisical vs Ory
- Infisical vs Microsoft Sentinel
