Cybersecurity · head to head
Arnica vs Auth0

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers; Auth0 free tier limited to 25,000 monthly active users, requiring upgrade for growth beyond that
- They diverge on capability: Arnica covers AI SAST, Auth0 covers Universal login.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arnica and Auth0 actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
Only in Auth0
- Universal login
- Social login
- Multi-factor authentication
- Passwordless
- User management
- Anomaly detection
- Extensibility
- Machine to machine
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot Auth0
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot Auth0
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot Auth0
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot Auth0
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot Auth0
Auth0
- B2C authenticationnot Arnica
- B2B authenticationnot Arnica
- B2E authenticationnot Arnica
- API securitynot Arnica
- Mobile app securitynot Arnica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
Auth0
- Free tier limited to 25,000 monthly active users, requiring upgrade for growth beyond that
- Advanced features like MFA and RBAC only available on paid Essentials tier and above
- Ownership by Okta introduces risk that independent product roadmap may change
Pricing, plan by plan
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
Auth0
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 25,000 monthly active users
- Basic authentication
- Email/password login
- Essentials (B2C)$35/month
- Unlimited MAUs beyond free tier
- Multi-Factor Authentication
- Role-Based Access Control
- Professional (B2C)$240/month
- All Essentials features
- Advanced security
- Custom branding
Which should you pick?
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Choose Auth0 if
- You need universal login.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want social login.
Questions people ask
- Is Arnica or Auth0 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arnica starts at Free and Auth0 at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arnica or Auth0?
- Arnica starts at Free and Auth0 at Free.
- Does Arnica or Auth0 run on more platforms?
- Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE. Auth0 runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Arnica for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Arnica best used for?
- Arnica is most often used for detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions, finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production, mapping container vulnerabilities back to source code, generating sbom for supply chain compliance requirements. Of those, detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions and finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production are not what Auth0 is typically brought in for.
- What can Arnica do that Auth0 cannot?
- Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning. Auth0 covers Universal login, Social login, Multi-factor authentication, Passwordless.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
SourceAuth0: How much does Auth0 cost?
Auth0 has a Free tier for up to 25,000 monthly active users (MAUs). Paid plans start at $35/month (Essentials B2C) and scale to $240/month (Professional B2C) and higher for Enterprise. Pricing scales with MAU usage.
SourceArnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
SourceAuth0: Does Auth0 include Multi-Factor Authentication?
No. MFA, RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), and premium support are not included in the free tier and require upgrading to paid Essentials plans or higher.
SourceArnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
SourceAuth0: Is Auth0 independent or part of a larger company?
Auth0 was acquired by Okta in May 2021 for $6.5 billion. It now operates as a subsidiary business unit within Okta, but maintains its own brand and operations.
SourceAuth0: Who should use Auth0 vs Okta?
Auth0 is developer-focused and serves customer identity use cases (B2C). Okta serves workforce identity (B2B) and has broader enterprise features. Auth0 now serves both markets post-acquisition but maintains its developer-friendly positioning.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Arnica vs Semgrep
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Chainguard
- Arnica vs Tenable
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Aikido
- Arnica vs Endor Labs
- Arnica vs Trivy
- Arnica vs Socket
- Arnica vs Infisical
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs RoboForm
- Arnica vs Sardine
- Arnica vs Semperis
- Arnica vs SentinelOne
- Arnica vs Shufti Pro
- Arnica vs Nessus
- Arnica vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Arnica vs Dashlane
- Arnica vs GitLab
- Arnica vs PostHog
- Arnica vs Datadog
- Arnica vs LaunchDarkly
- Arnica vs LogRocket
- Arnica vs Postman
- Arnica vs Jira
- Arnica vs Sentry
- Arnica vs Eclipse
- Arnica vs Docker
- Arnica vs Supabase
- Arnica vs Istio
- Arnica vs Lovable
- Arnica vs Lucidchart
- Arnica vs MongoDB
- Arnica vs Nagios XI
- Arnica vs MongoDB Atlas
- Auth0 vs Semgrep
- Auth0 vs Snyk
- Auth0 vs Chainguard
- Auth0 vs Tenable
- Auth0 vs Doppler
- Auth0 vs Aikido
- Auth0 vs Endor Labs
- Auth0 vs Trivy
- Auth0 vs Socket
- Auth0 vs Infisical
- Auth0 vs Bitwarden
- Auth0 vs RoboForm
- Auth0 vs Sardine
- Auth0 vs Semperis
- Auth0 vs SentinelOne
- Auth0 vs Shufti Pro
- Auth0 vs Nessus
- Auth0 vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Auth0 vs Dashlane
- Auth0 vs GitLab
- Auth0 vs PostHog
- Auth0 vs Datadog
- Auth0 vs LaunchDarkly
- Auth0 vs LogRocket
- Auth0 vs Postman
- Auth0 vs Jira
- Auth0 vs Sentry
- Auth0 vs Eclipse
- Auth0 vs Docker
- Auth0 vs Supabase
- Auth0 vs Istio
- Auth0 vs Lovable
- Auth0 vs Lucidchart
- Auth0 vs MongoDB
- Auth0 vs Nagios XI
- Auth0 vs MongoDB Atlas

