Operating Systems · head to head
Arch Linux vs Linux Mint
Arch Linux
Operating Systems
Rolling-release Linux distribution you assemble yourself
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Linux Mint
Operating Systems
Ubuntu-based Linux distribution built for familiarity
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Arch Linux installation and maintenance assume real Linux knowledge; there is no hand-holding by design; Linux Mint based on Ubuntu LTS, so packages are deliberately older than rolling distributions
- They diverge on capability: Arch Linux covers Rolling release, Linux Mint covers Cinnamon desktop.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arch Linux and Linux Mint actually diverge.
| Attribute | Arch Linux | Linux Mint |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), platforms (Linux, Desktop), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Operating Systems).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arch Linux
- Rolling release
- Minimal base
- Pacman and the AUR
- The Arch Wiki
Only in Linux Mint
- Cinnamon desktop
- Codecs included
- Ubuntu package base
- Update manager
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arch Linux
- Developers who want current toolchain versions without backportingnot Linux Mint
- Systems where every installed package should be a deliberate choicenot Linux Mint
- Learning how a Linux system actually fits togethernot Linux Mint
Linux Mint
- Moving a desktop or laptop off Windows with minimal retrainingnot Arch Linux
- Reviving older hardware that struggles with current Windows releasesnot Arch Linux
- Everyday desktop use where stability matters more than the newest packagesnot Arch Linux
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arch Linux
- Installation and maintenance assume real Linux knowledge; there is no hand-holding by design
- Rolling releases break: an update can require manual intervention, and reading the news before updating is genuinely expected
- Unsuitable for machines that must simply keep working without attention
- AUR packages are user-submitted and carry no security review
Linux Mint
- Based on Ubuntu LTS, so packages are deliberately older than rolling distributions
- Cinnamon is less polished on fractional scaling and multi-monitor setups than GNOME or KDE
- Smaller team than Ubuntu or Fedora, which shows in the pace of security response for its own components
- Wayland support has lagged behind the major desktops
Pricing, plan by plan
Arch Linux
Free- Arch LinuxFree
- Full operating system
- All updates
- Community support
Linux Mint
Free- Linux MintFree
- Full operating system
- All updates
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Arch Linux if
- You need rolling release.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Desktop.
- You also want minimal base.
Choose Linux Mint if
- You need cinnamon desktop.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Desktop.
- You also want codecs included.
Questions people ask
- Is Arch Linux or Linux Mint better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arch Linux starts at Free and Linux Mint at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arch Linux or Linux Mint?
- Arch Linux starts at Free and Linux Mint at Free.
- Does Arch Linux or Linux Mint run on more platforms?
- Both run on Linux, Desktop, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Arch Linux for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Arch Linux best used for?
- Arch Linux is most often used for developers who want current toolchain versions without backporting, systems where every installed package should be a deliberate choice, learning how a linux system actually fits together. Of those, developers who want current toolchain versions without backporting and systems where every installed package should be a deliberate choice are not what Linux Mint is typically brought in for.
- What can Arch Linux do that Linux Mint cannot?
- Arch Linux covers Rolling release, Minimal base, Pacman and the AUR, The Arch Wiki. Linux Mint covers Cinnamon desktop, Codecs included, Ubuntu package base, Update manager.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arch Linux: Is Arch Linux free?
Yes, entirely free and open source.
Linux Mint: Is Linux Mint free?
Yes, entirely free and open source, funded by donations and sponsors.
Arch Linux: Is Arch good for beginners?
Not as a first Linux system. It assumes you will read documentation and maintain the system yourself, which is the trade it makes deliberately.
Linux Mint: Is Linux Mint good for beginners?
It is one of the most commonly recommended distributions for people leaving Windows, because the desktop layout is conventional and media codecs are installed by default.
Arch Linux: What is the AUR?
The Arch User Repository, a very large collection of user-submitted build scripts. It is why almost anything is installable on Arch, and it carries no security review.
Linux Mint: Can I run Ubuntu software on Linux Mint?
Yes. Mint is built on Ubuntu and uses its repositories, so nearly all Ubuntu packages and instructions apply.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Arch Linux vs Ubuntu
- Arch Linux vs Debian
- Arch Linux vs Fedora
- Arch Linux vs FreeBSD
- Arch Linux vs Manjaro
- Arch Linux vs Pop!_OS
- Arch Linux vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- Linux Mint vs Ubuntu
- Linux Mint vs Debian
- Linux Mint vs Fedora
- Linux Mint vs FreeBSD
- Linux Mint vs Manjaro
- Linux Mint vs Pop!_OS
- Linux Mint vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux