Agriculture · head to head
Arable vs Yr.no
The short version
- Only Yr.no has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Arable requires the Mark 3 field sensor, so it is a hardware deployment rather than a software subscription; Yr.no full API/data usage requires attribution to the Norwegian Meteorological Institute and NRK per their terms, not a no-strings-attached free service
- They diverge on capability: Arable covers Weather monitoring, Yr.no covers Hourly forecasts.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arable and Yr.no actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arable
- Weather monitoring
- Evapotranspiration
- Chlorophyll index
- Disease risk models
- Growth stage tracking
- Climate FieldView
- John Deere
- Trimble
Only in Yr.no
- Hourly forecasts
- Long-term predictions
- Precipitation graphs
- Wind data
- Aurora forecasts
- Open API
- Widgets
- Smart displays
Both cover
- Web support
- Ios support
- Android support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arable
- In-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensornot Yr.no
- Irrigation scheduling based on measured conditionsnot Yr.no
- Water sustainability reporting for enterprise growersnot Yr.no
- Weather risk management across dispersed fieldsnot Yr.no
Yr.no
- Checking day-by-day and hour-by-hour weather forecasts with graph detailsnot Arable
- Now-cast alerts for rainfall expected within the next 90 minutesnot Arable
- Viewing UV forecasts, pollen spread, and air pollution overviewsnot Arable
- Embedding free weather widgets/modules on third-party websitesnot Arable
- Building weather features into apps via Yr's free REST APIs (forecasts, alerts, radar, ocean data)not Arable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arable
- Requires the Mark 3 field sensor, so it is a hardware deployment rather than a software subscription
- Pricing is not published and goes through a sales conversation
- Aimed at enterprise growers and advisors rather than smallholders
Yr.no
- Full API/data usage requires attribution to the Norwegian Meteorological Institute and NRK per their terms, not a no-strings-attached free service
- Product and documentation are heavily Norway/Nordic-centric in framing even though forecasts cover any location on earth
- No paid/pro consumer tier is published, monetization/support model beyond the free service is unclear from primary sources
Pricing, plan by plan
Arable
$29/month- Standard$1200/device/year
- Weather data
- Crop stress
- Basic analytics
- Premium$2400/device/year
- Full analytics
- Disease models
- API access
Yr.no
Free- FreeFree
- Full weather data
- Hourly forecasts
- Long-term outlook
Which should you pick?
Choose Arable if
- You need weather monitoring.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware.
- You also want evapotranspiration.
Choose Yr.no if
- You need hourly forecasts.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want long-term predictions.
Questions people ask
- Is Arable or Yr.no better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arable starts at $29/month and Yr.no at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arable or Yr.no?
- Yr.no has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29/month for Arable and Free for Yr.no.
- Does Arable or Yr.no run on more platforms?
- Arable runs on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware. Yr.no runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Yr.no for free?
- Yes. Yr.no has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Arable starts at $29/month.
- What is Arable best used for?
- Arable is most often used for in-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensor, irrigation scheduling based on measured conditions, water sustainability reporting for enterprise growers, weather risk management across dispersed fields. Of those, in-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensor and irrigation scheduling based on measured conditions are not what Yr.no is typically brought in for.
- What can Arable do that Yr.no cannot?
- Arable covers Weather monitoring, Evapotranspiration, Chlorophyll index, Disease risk models. Yr.no covers Hourly forecasts, Long-term predictions, Precipitation graphs, Wind data. Both handle Web support, Ios support, Android support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arable: How do I get pricing for Arable?
Pricing is not published online. Customers can contact Arable directly at [email protected] or by phone at 510-992-4095, or visit their contact page at /contact to request pricing information.
SourceYr.no: Is Yr.no free to use?
Yes, Yr.no is a free weather forecasting service. It is a collaboration between NRK (Norwegian Broadcasting) and The Norwegian Meteorological Institute.
SourceArable: Is there a free trial available?
The website does not mention a free trial. Interested customers should contact the company directly to inquire about trial availability.
SourceYr.no: Does Yr.no require registration or payment to access weather forecasts?
The website does not mention any registration requirements, subscription tiers, or payment obligations. Access to weather information appears to be free without account creation.
SourceArable: Can I get pricing without speaking to sales?
No. Pricing information is only available through direct contact with Arable via email, phone, or their contact form. There is no self-service pricing page.
SourceYr.no: Who funds and maintains Yr.no if it is free?
Yr.no is maintained as a public service collaboration between NRK (Norwegian public broadcasting) and The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, both government-supported organizations.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Arable vs Granular
- Arable vs CropX
- Arable vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Arable vs Teralytic
- Arable vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Arable vs Netafim NetBeat
- Arable vs Soil Scout
- Arable vs AgriSync
- Arable vs Bushel
- Arable vs Sentera
- Arable vs DTN Agriculture
- Arable vs Taranis
- Arable vs Farmers Edge
- Arable vs FarmWorks
- Arable vs fieldmargin
- Arable vs FieldView Plus
- Arable vs Gallagher eShepherd
- Arable vs GAMAYA
- Arable vs AccuWeather
- Arable vs The Weather Channel
- Arable vs MyRadar
- Arable vs WeatherBug
- Arable vs EPA AirNow
- Arable vs Zoom Earth
- Arable vs Carrot Weather
- Arable vs RainViewer
- Arable vs Weather.gov
- Arable vs AirVisual
- Arable vs Baron Weather
- Arable vs Foreca
- Arable vs MeteoGroup
- Arable vs OpenWeatherMap
- Arable vs Windy
- Arable vs Weather Underground PWS
- Arable vs WSI (The Weather Company)
- Yr.no vs Granular
- Yr.no vs CropX
- Yr.no vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Yr.no vs Teralytic
- Yr.no vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Yr.no vs Netafim NetBeat
- Yr.no vs Soil Scout
- Yr.no vs AgriSync
- Yr.no vs Bushel
- Yr.no vs Sentera
- Yr.no vs DTN Agriculture
- Yr.no vs Taranis
- Yr.no vs Farmers Edge
- Yr.no vs FarmWorks
- Yr.no vs fieldmargin
- Yr.no vs FieldView Plus
- Yr.no vs Gallagher eShepherd
- Yr.no vs GAMAYA
- Yr.no vs AccuWeather
- Yr.no vs The Weather Channel
- Yr.no vs MyRadar
- Yr.no vs WeatherBug
- Yr.no vs EPA AirNow
- Yr.no vs Zoom Earth
- Yr.no vs Carrot Weather
- Yr.no vs RainViewer
- Yr.no vs Weather.gov
- Yr.no vs AirVisual
- Yr.no vs Baron Weather
- Yr.no vs Foreca
- Yr.no vs MeteoGroup
- Yr.no vs OpenWeatherMap
- Yr.no vs Windy
- Yr.no vs Weather Underground PWS
- Yr.no vs WSI (The Weather Company)


