Agriculture · head to head
Arable vs Weather.gov
The short version
- Only Weather.gov has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Arable requires the Mark 3 field sensor, so it is a hardware deployment rather than a software subscription; Weather.gov no official mobile app, requiring users to access through browser or shortcuts
- They diverge on capability: Arable covers Weather monitoring, Weather.gov covers Official forecasts.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arable and Weather.gov actually diverge.
| Attribute | Arable | Weather.gov |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Hardware | Web |
| Category | Agriculture | Weather |
| Founded | 2014 | 1870 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arable
- Weather monitoring
- Evapotranspiration
- Chlorophyll index
- Disease risk models
- Growth stage tracking
- Climate FieldView
- John Deere
- Trimble
Only in Weather.gov
- Official forecasts
- Severe weather warnings
- Radar imagery
- Marine forecasts
- Aviation weather
- API access
- Data feeds
- Alert systems
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arable
- In-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensornot Weather.gov
- Irrigation scheduling based on measured conditionsnot Weather.gov
- Water sustainability reporting for enterprise growersnot Weather.gov
- Weather risk management across dispersed fieldsnot Weather.gov
Weather.gov
- Professional Worknot Arable
- Content Creationnot Arable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arable
- Requires the Mark 3 field sensor, so it is a hardware deployment rather than a software subscription
- Pricing is not published and goes through a sales conversation
- Aimed at enterprise growers and advisors rather than smallholders
Weather.gov
- No official mobile app, requiring users to access through browser or shortcuts
- No push notifications for weather alerts
- Outdated user interface compared to commercial alternatives
- Mobile website has been decommissioned with no dedicated mobile experience
Pricing, plan by plan
Arable
$29/month- Standard$1200/device/year
- Weather data
- Crop stress
- Basic analytics
- Premium$2400/device/year
- Full analytics
- Disease models
- API access
Weather.gov
Free- FreeFree
- All forecasts
- Severe weather alerts
- Radar data
Which should you pick?
Choose Arable if
- You need weather monitoring.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware.
- You also want evapotranspiration.
Choose Weather.gov if
- You need official forecasts.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want severe weather warnings.
Questions people ask
- Is Arable or Weather.gov better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arable starts at $29/month and Weather.gov at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arable or Weather.gov?
- Weather.gov has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $29/month for Arable and Free for Weather.gov.
- Does Arable or Weather.gov run on more platforms?
- Arable runs on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware. Weather.gov runs on Web.
- Can I use Weather.gov for free?
- Yes. Weather.gov has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Arable starts at $29/month.
- What is Arable best used for?
- Arable is most often used for in-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensor, irrigation scheduling based on measured conditions, water sustainability reporting for enterprise growers, weather risk management across dispersed fields. Of those, in-field weather and crop monitoring from a single sensor and irrigation scheduling based on measured conditions are not what Weather.gov is typically brought in for.
- What can Arable do that Weather.gov cannot?
- Arable covers Weather monitoring, Evapotranspiration, Chlorophyll index, Disease risk models. Weather.gov covers Official forecasts, Severe weather warnings, Radar imagery, Marine forecasts. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arable: How do I get pricing for Arable?
Pricing is not published online. Customers can contact Arable directly at [email protected] or by phone at 510-992-4095, or visit their contact page at /contact to request pricing information.
SourceWeather.gov: Does Weather.gov have a mobile app?
No. The National Weather Service does not provide an official mobile app. Users can access weather.gov through a mobile browser or create a home screen shortcut, but there is no dedicated app for push notifications or offline access.
SourceArable: Is there a free trial available?
The website does not mention a free trial. Interested customers should contact the company directly to inquire about trial availability.
SourceWeather.gov: Is Weather.gov free?
Yes. Weather.gov and its public API at api.weather.gov are completely free to use with no subscription fees. The API only requires a User-Agent header identification and serves weather data at no cost.
SourceArable: Can I get pricing without speaking to sales?
No. Pricing information is only available through direct contact with Arable via email, phone, or their contact form. There is no self-service pricing page.
SourceWeather.gov: What data formats does Weather.gov API support?
The API supports multiple formats including GeoJSON (default), JSON-LD, DWML, OXML, CAP (Common Alerting Protocol), and ATOM, allowing developers to integrate weather data into various applications.
SourceWeather.gov: Can I get detailed forecast data beyond basic predictions?
Yes. Weather.gov provides gridpoint endpoints with 12-hour and hourly forecast periods, raw forecast data at approximately 2.5km resolution, current observations from weather stations, and detailed alerts with state, county, and zone filtering.
SourceRelated pages
More on Weather.gov
Other head to heads
- Arable vs Granular
- Arable vs CropX
- Arable vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Arable vs Teralytic
- Arable vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Arable vs Netafim NetBeat
- Arable vs Soil Scout
- Arable vs AgriSync
- Arable vs Bushel
- Arable vs Sentera
- Arable vs DTN Agriculture
- Arable vs Taranis
- Arable vs Farmers Edge
- Arable vs FarmWorks
- Arable vs fieldmargin
- Arable vs FieldView Plus
- Arable vs Gallagher eShepherd
- Arable vs GAMAYA
- Arable vs The Weather Channel
- Arable vs AccuWeather
- Arable vs OpenWeatherMap
- Arable vs EPA AirNow
- Arable vs WeatherBug
- Arable vs Baron Weather
- Arable vs NOAA Weather Radar Live
- Arable vs Weather Mate
- Arable vs Yr.no
- Arable vs MeteoGroup
- Arable vs Zoom Earth
- Arable vs Meteomatics
- Arable vs Tomorrow.io
- Arable vs Weathernews Inc
- Arable vs Weatherstack
- Arable vs 1Weather
- Arable vs AirVisual
- Weather.gov vs Granular
- Weather.gov vs CropX
- Weather.gov vs METER Group ZENTRA
- Weather.gov vs Teralytic
- Weather.gov vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Weather.gov vs Netafim NetBeat
- Weather.gov vs Soil Scout
- Weather.gov vs AgriSync
- Weather.gov vs Bushel
- Weather.gov vs Sentera
- Weather.gov vs DTN Agriculture
- Weather.gov vs Taranis
- Weather.gov vs Farmers Edge
- Weather.gov vs FarmWorks
- Weather.gov vs fieldmargin
- Weather.gov vs FieldView Plus
- Weather.gov vs Gallagher eShepherd
- Weather.gov vs GAMAYA
- Weather.gov vs The Weather Channel
- Weather.gov vs AccuWeather
- Weather.gov vs OpenWeatherMap
- Weather.gov vs EPA AirNow
- Weather.gov vs WeatherBug
- Weather.gov vs Baron Weather
- Weather.gov vs NOAA Weather Radar Live
- Weather.gov vs Weather Mate
- Weather.gov vs Yr.no
- Weather.gov vs MeteoGroup
- Weather.gov vs Zoom Earth
- Weather.gov vs Meteomatics
- Weather.gov vs Tomorrow.io
- Weather.gov vs Weathernews Inc
- Weather.gov vs Weatherstack
- Weather.gov vs 1Weather
- Weather.gov vs AirVisual


