Technology · head to head
Safari vs GNAT Pro

Safari
Technology
Apple's WebKit browser, available only on Apple operating systems and updated only with them.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

GNAT Pro
Developer Tools
Software development environments and toolchains for Ada, C/C++ and Rust
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Safari has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Safari it runs only on Apple operating systems; there has been no Windows build since 2012 and none for Linux or Android, so any team that must verify Safari behaviour has to buy Mac hardware or rent it from a device cloud, which is a line item Chrome and Firefox do not create.; GNAT Pro no pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Safari and GNAT Pro actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Safari
- WebKit engine
- Intelligent Tracking Prevention
- Energy optimisation
- iCloud Private Relay
- Passkeys in iCloud Keychain
- Handoff and tab sync
- Profiles and Tab Groups
- Web Inspector
Only in GNAT Pro
Nothing recorded that Safari does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Safari
- Getting the longest battery life out of a MacBook, where the difference against Chromium browsers is hours rather than minutesnot GNAT Pro
- Debugging a site on a real iPhone or iPad, which requires Safari's Web Inspector connected over USB from a Macnot GNAT Pro
- An all-Apple household or team that wants tabs, passwords and passkeys to follow them across devices without a third-party accountnot GNAT Pro
- Privacy-conscious users on iCloud+ who want tracking protection and Private Relay working by default rather than through extensionsnot GNAT Pro
GNAT Pro
- Building certified avionics software meeting DO-178B/C standardsnot Safari
- Developing automotive embedded systems with ISO-26262 compliancenot Safari
- Integrating Ada, C/C++, and Rust components in single codebasenot Safari
- Managing software supply chain vulnerabilities and SBOMsnot Safari
- Supporting long-lived software systems spanning decadesnot Safari
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Safari
- It runs only on Apple operating systems; there has been no Windows build since 2012 and none for Linux or Android, so any team that must verify Safari behaviour has to buy Mac hardware or rent it from a device cloud, which is a line item Chrome and Firefox do not create.
- Safari's version is bound to the operating system's version, so a Mac that has fallen off the supported macOS list stops receiving Safari updates altogether; the browser's security life is the machine's OS life, roughly three years of updates after the last major release it can run.
- Distributing an extension means packaging it inside a signed macOS application and shipping it through the App Store with a paid Apple Developer Program membership, which makes a small internal or single-team extension impractical.
- Automated testing uses safaridriver, which runs on macOS only, has no headless mode and permits one session per machine, so Safari coverage in CI means real Macs in the pipeline rather than containers, and it does not parallelise the way Chromium does.
- Web platform features generally land in WebKit later than in Blink and Gecko, so Safari's current support is in practice the compatibility floor for any project, and a feature you can use everywhere else may be a year away here.
- Enterprise management is thin: configuration profiles cover a modest set of settings with nothing comparable to the several hundred administrative policies Chrome and Edge expose, so a managed fleet cannot control Safari to the same degree.
GNAT Pro
- No pricing published on website; requires contacting AdaCore directly for quotes
- Vendor indicates per-user, per-year subscription model but does not disclose specific costs
Pricing, plan by plan
Safari
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Safari review.
GNAT Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the GNAT Pro review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Safari if
- You need webkit engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want intelligent tracking prevention.
Choose GNAT Pro if
Nothing in the data separates GNAT Pro from Safari on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Safari or GNAT Pro better?
- Neither clearly leads. Safari starts at Free and GNAT Pro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Safari or GNAT Pro?
- Safari has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Safari and On request for GNAT Pro.
- Does Safari or GNAT Pro run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Safari for free?
- Yes. Safari has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. GNAT Pro starts at On request.
- What is Safari best used for?
- Safari is most often used for getting the longest battery life out of a macbook, where the difference against chromium browsers is hours rather than minutes, debugging a site on a real iphone or ipad, which requires safari's web inspector connected over usb from a mac, an all-apple household or team that wants tabs, passwords and passkeys to follow them across devices without a third-party account, privacy-conscious users on icloud+ who want tracking protection and private relay working by default rather than through extensions. Of those, getting the longest battery life out of a macbook, where the difference against chromium browsers is hours rather than minutes and debugging a site on a real iphone or ipad, which requires safari's web inspector connected over usb from a mac are not what GNAT Pro is typically brought in for.
- What can Safari do that GNAT Pro cannot?
- Safari covers WebKit engine, Intelligent Tracking Prevention, Energy optimisation, iCloud Private Relay.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Safari: Can I run Safari on Windows or Linux?
No. The last Windows version was Safari 5.1.7 in 2012 and it is long unsupported. There has never been a Linux build. Testing Safari requires macOS, either your own or a rented cloud device.
GNAT Pro: How much does GNAT Pro cost?
GNAT Pro pricing is not published on the website. Customers must request a pricing quote by contacting AdaCore directly or speaking with a GNAT Pro expert.
SourceSafari: How do I test my site in Safari without a Mac?
Through a cloud device farm such as BrowserStack, Sauce Labs or LambdaTest, which run real macOS and iOS instances. There is no reliable local emulation, because other browsers on Windows and Linux do not use WebKit.
GNAT Pro: What is GNAT Pro licensing model?
GNAT Pro is sold on a per-user, per-year basis with no license locks. Customers can request pricing for their specific needs.
SourceSafari: Are other iPhone browsers really different from Safari?
Historically no: Apple required all iOS browsers to use WebKit, so Chrome and Firefox on iPhone were interface shells around Safari's engine. The EU's Digital Markets Act now permits alternative engines, but adoption is limited, so in practice iOS testing still means WebKit.
Safari: Why does Safari not get a new version on my old Mac?
Safari ships with the operating system. When a Mac can no longer run a macOS version that Apple still updates, Safari stops updating too, including its security fixes.
Safari: What does it cost?
Nothing. It is included with Apple operating systems. Private Relay requires an iCloud+ subscription, and publishing an extension requires a paid Apple Developer Program membership.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Safari vs Microsoft Edge
- Safari vs Mozilla Firefox
- Safari vs Google Chrome
- Safari vs Trino
- Safari vs Apache Spark
- Safari vs GitHub Desktop
- Safari vs ClickUp
- Safari vs Intercom
- Safari vs Monday.com
- Safari vs Maze
- Safari vs PyCharm
- Safari vs MongoDB
- Safari vs Nagios XI
- Safari vs Postgres
- Safari vs Shortcut
- Safari vs Site24x7
- Safari vs Microsoft Outlook
- Safari vs MongoDB Atlas
- Safari vs CLion
- Safari vs Rust
- Safari vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Safari vs Keil MDK
- Safari vs RAD Studio
- Safari vs Penpot
- Safari vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Safari vs Helix
- Safari vs JetBrains Rider
- Safari vs Coder
- Safari vs StackBlitz
- Safari vs ConfigCat
- Safari vs Nix
- Safari vs Nixpacks
- Safari vs Octopus Deploy
- Safari vs Okteto
- Safari vs OpsLevel
- Safari vs PartyKit
- GNAT Pro vs Microsoft Edge
- GNAT Pro vs Mozilla Firefox
- GNAT Pro vs Google Chrome
- GNAT Pro vs Trino
- GNAT Pro vs Apache Spark
- GNAT Pro vs GitHub Desktop
- GNAT Pro vs ClickUp
- GNAT Pro vs Intercom
- GNAT Pro vs Monday.com
- GNAT Pro vs Maze
- GNAT Pro vs PyCharm
- GNAT Pro vs MongoDB
- GNAT Pro vs Nagios XI
- GNAT Pro vs Postgres
- GNAT Pro vs Shortcut
- GNAT Pro vs Site24x7
- GNAT Pro vs Microsoft Outlook
- GNAT Pro vs MongoDB Atlas
- GNAT Pro vs CLion
- GNAT Pro vs Rust
- GNAT Pro vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- GNAT Pro vs Keil MDK
- GNAT Pro vs RAD Studio
- GNAT Pro vs Penpot
- GNAT Pro vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- GNAT Pro vs Helix
- GNAT Pro vs JetBrains Rider
- GNAT Pro vs Coder
- GNAT Pro vs StackBlitz
- GNAT Pro vs ConfigCat
- GNAT Pro vs Nix
- GNAT Pro vs Nixpacks
- GNAT Pro vs Octopus Deploy
- GNAT Pro vs Okteto
- GNAT Pro vs OpsLevel
- GNAT Pro vs PartyKit
