Technology · head to head
Safari vs ESLint
Safari
Technology
Apple's WebKit browser, available only on Apple operating systems and updated only with them.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Safari it runs only on Apple operating systems; there has been no Windows build since 2012 and none for Linux or Android, so any team that must verify Safari behaviour has to buy Mac hardware or rent it from a device cloud, which is a line item Chrome and Firefox do not create.; ESLint slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Safari and ESLint actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Safari
- WebKit engine
- Intelligent Tracking Prevention
- Energy optimisation
- iCloud Private Relay
- Passkeys in iCloud Keychain
- Handoff and tab sync
- Profiles and Tab Groups
- Web Inspector
Only in ESLint
Nothing recorded that Safari does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Safari
- Getting the longest battery life out of a MacBook, where the difference against Chromium browsers is hours rather than minutesnot ESLint
- Debugging a site on a real iPhone or iPad, which requires Safari's Web Inspector connected over USB from a Macnot ESLint
- An all-Apple household or team that wants tabs, passwords and passkeys to follow them across devices without a third-party accountnot ESLint
- Privacy-conscious users on iCloud+ who want tracking protection and Private Relay working by default rather than through extensionsnot ESLint
ESLint
- Statically analysing JavaScript and JSX to find problems before runtimenot Safari
- Automatically fixing issues with syntax-aware rewritesnot Safari
- Enforcing a consistent code style across a teamnot Safari
- Running as a CI step to block non-conforming codenot Safari
- Writing custom rules for project-specific conventionsnot Safari
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Safari
- It runs only on Apple operating systems; there has been no Windows build since 2012 and none for Linux or Android, so any team that must verify Safari behaviour has to buy Mac hardware or rent it from a device cloud, which is a line item Chrome and Firefox do not create.
- Safari's version is bound to the operating system's version, so a Mac that has fallen off the supported macOS list stops receiving Safari updates altogether; the browser's security life is the machine's OS life, roughly three years of updates after the last major release it can run.
- Distributing an extension means packaging it inside a signed macOS application and shipping it through the App Store with a paid Apple Developer Program membership, which makes a small internal or single-team extension impractical.
- Automated testing uses safaridriver, which runs on macOS only, has no headless mode and permits one session per machine, so Safari coverage in CI means real Macs in the pipeline rather than containers, and it does not parallelise the way Chromium does.
- Web platform features generally land in WebKit later than in Blink and Gecko, so Safari's current support is in practice the compatibility floor for any project, and a feature you can use everywhere else may be a year away here.
- Enterprise management is thin: configuration profiles cover a modest set of settings with nothing comparable to the several hundred administrative policies Chrome and Edge expose, so a managed fleet cannot control Safari to the same degree.
ESLint
- Slow performance on large codebases compared to newer tools like Oxlint and Biome
- Complexity in configuration from scratch, particularly for TypeScript support
- Limited built-in TypeScript support, requiring separate parsers and coordination with new TypeScript features
Pricing, plan by plan
Safari
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Safari review.
ESLint
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ESLint review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Safari if
- You need webkit engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want intelligent tracking prevention.
Choose ESLint if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment.
Questions people ask
- Is Safari or ESLint better?
- Neither clearly leads. Safari starts at Free and ESLint at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Safari or ESLint?
- Safari starts at Free and ESLint at Free.
- Does Safari or ESLint run on more platforms?
- Safari runs on Web. ESLint runs on Browser-based JavaScript, Node.js, Any JavaScript environment.
- Can I use Safari for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Safari best used for?
- Safari is most often used for getting the longest battery life out of a macbook, where the difference against chromium browsers is hours rather than minutes, debugging a site on a real iphone or ipad, which requires safari's web inspector connected over usb from a mac, an all-apple household or team that wants tabs, passwords and passkeys to follow them across devices without a third-party account, privacy-conscious users on icloud+ who want tracking protection and private relay working by default rather than through extensions. Of those, getting the longest battery life out of a macbook, where the difference against chromium browsers is hours rather than minutes and debugging a site on a real iphone or ipad, which requires safari's web inspector connected over usb from a mac are not what ESLint is typically brought in for.
- What can Safari do that ESLint cannot?
- Safari covers WebKit engine, Intelligent Tracking Prevention, Energy optimisation, iCloud Private Relay.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Safari: Can I run Safari on Windows or Linux?
No. The last Windows version was Safari 5.1.7 in 2012 and it is long unsupported. There has never been a Linux build. Testing Safari requires macOS, either your own or a rented cloud device.
ESLint: Does ESLint automatically fix code issues?
Many problems ESLint finds can be automatically fixed via the --fix flag. ESLint fixes are syntax-aware so you won't experience errors introduced by traditional find-and-replace algorithms.
SourceSafari: How do I test my site in Safari without a Mac?
Through a cloud device farm such as BrowserStack, Sauce Labs or LambdaTest, which run real macOS and iOS instances. There is no reliable local emulation, because other browsers on Windows and Linux do not use WebKit.
ESLint: How much does ESLint cost?
ESLint is completely free and open-source software maintained by the OpenJS Foundation. The project accepts voluntary donations from sponsors.
SourceSafari: Are other iPhone browsers really different from Safari?
Historically no: Apple required all iOS browsers to use WebKit, so Chrome and Firefox on iPhone were interface shells around Safari's engine. The EU's Digital Markets Act now permits alternative engines, but adoption is limited, so in practice iOS testing still means WebKit.
ESLint: Can I write custom ESLint rules?
Yes. You can develop custom rules that work alongside built-in functionality through ESLint's plugin system, allowing complete customization for your project needs.
SourceSafari: Why does Safari not get a new version on my old Mac?
Safari ships with the operating system. When a Mac can no longer run a macOS version that Apple still updates, Safari stops updating too, including its security fixes.
Safari: What does it cost?
Nothing. It is included with Apple operating systems. Private Relay requires an iCloud+ subscription, and publishing an extension requires a paid Apple Developer Program membership.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Safari vs Microsoft Edge
- Safari vs Mozilla Firefox
- Safari vs Google Chrome
- Safari vs Trino
- Safari vs Apache Spark
- Safari vs GitHub Desktop
- Safari vs ClickUp
- Safari vs Intercom
- Safari vs Monday.com
- Safari vs Maze
- Safari vs PyCharm
- Safari vs MongoDB
- Safari vs Nagios XI
- Safari vs Postgres
- Safari vs Shortcut
- Safari vs Site24x7
- Safari vs Microsoft Outlook
- Safari vs MongoDB Atlas
- Safari vs Turborepo
- Safari vs Prettier
- Safari vs Deno
- Safari vs Fig
- Safari vs Vite
- Safari vs Harness
- Safari vs Ansible
- Safari vs Buildkite
- Safari vs Argo CD
- Safari vs GitLab CI/CD
- Safari vs HCP Terraform
- Safari vs Helm
- Safari vs Earthly
- Safari vs Eclipse IDE
- Safari vs Moonrepo
- Safari vs Nx Cloud
- Safari vs Pants Build
- ESLint vs Microsoft Edge
- ESLint vs Mozilla Firefox
- ESLint vs Google Chrome
- ESLint vs Trino
- ESLint vs Apache Spark
- ESLint vs GitHub Desktop
- ESLint vs ClickUp
- ESLint vs Intercom
- ESLint vs Monday.com
- ESLint vs Maze
- ESLint vs PyCharm
- ESLint vs MongoDB
- ESLint vs Nagios XI
- ESLint vs Postgres
- ESLint vs Shortcut
- ESLint vs Site24x7
- ESLint vs Microsoft Outlook
- ESLint vs MongoDB Atlas
- ESLint vs Turborepo
- ESLint vs Prettier
- ESLint vs Deno
- ESLint vs Fig
- ESLint vs Vite
- ESLint vs Harness
- ESLint vs Ansible
- ESLint vs Buildkite
- ESLint vs Argo CD
- ESLint vs GitLab CI/CD
- ESLint vs HCP Terraform
- ESLint vs Helm
- ESLint vs Earthly
- ESLint vs Eclipse IDE
- ESLint vs Moonrepo
- ESLint vs Nx Cloud
- ESLint vs Pants Build