Software · head to head
Apollo GraphQL vs Stainless

Apollo GraphQL
Software
GraphQL platform and API orchestration layer for building unified graphs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Stainless
Software
Generates client SDKs, API docs, and MCP servers from an OpenAPI spec
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apollo GraphQL pricing beyond the Developer tier requires contacting sales, making cost comparison harder for mid-size teams.; Stainless starter and Pro plan prices are not published and require contacting the company.
- They diverge on capability: Apollo GraphQL covers Apollo Connectors, Stainless covers SDK generation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apollo GraphQL and Stainless actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apollo GraphQL | Stainless |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), platforms (web, api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apollo GraphQL
- Apollo Connectors
- GraphOS Router
- Schema registry
- Schema checks
- Response caching
- Audit logging
Only in Stainless
- SDK generation
- MCP server generation
- Docs site generation
- Webhooks and streaming support
- Automated unit tests
- Git integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apollo GraphQL
- Federating multiple backend services into one GraphQL APInot Stainless
- Wrapping legacy REST APIs for frontend consumptionnot Stainless
- Enterprise API governance with schema checks and audit logsnot Stainless
- Reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of datanot Stainless
Stainless
- Generating typed SDKs for a public APInot Apollo GraphQL
- Producing an MCP server from an existing OpenAPI specnot Apollo GraphQL
- Building an API documentation site alongside client librariesnot Apollo GraphQL
- Giving open-source APIs a free SDK generation pathnot Apollo GraphQL
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apollo GraphQL
- Pricing beyond the Developer tier requires contacting sales, making cost comparison harder for mid-size teams.
- Adopting GraphOS effectively requires buy-in to the GraphQL paradigm, which is a larger architectural shift than adding a REST gateway.
- The free plan's 1-day data retention and 60 req/min self-hosted router limit make it unsuitable for production use.
- Volume-based per-request pricing can become expensive at very high request volumes compared to flat-rate API gateways.
Stainless
- Starter and Pro plan prices are not published and require contacting the company.
- The free plan caps APIs at 25 endpoints, which excludes larger production APIs.
- Overage charges apply per SDK/endpoint/month once limits are exceeded, which can make costs unpredictable at scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Apollo GraphQL
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support
- Developer$5/month
- $5 per million requests with volume discounts
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- Standard$undefined/month
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- 24x7x365 support with SLA
Stainless
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 generators (SDKs, docs, or MCP servers)
- 5 seats
- APIs with 25 or fewer endpoints
- Starter$undefined/mo
- Unlimited generators
- Expanded seats
- Private SDKs of any size
- Pro$undefined/mo
- Custom enterprise features and pricing
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Dedicated support
- SOC 2 compliance reports
- Purchase order/invoicing with negotiable terms
Which should you pick?
Choose Apollo GraphQL if
- You need apollo connectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want graphos router.
Choose Stainless if
- You need sdk generation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want mcp server generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Apollo GraphQL or Stainless better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apollo GraphQL starts at Free and Stainless at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apollo GraphQL or Stainless?
- Apollo GraphQL starts at Free and Stainless at Free.
- Does Apollo GraphQL or Stainless run on more platforms?
- Both run on web, api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Apollo GraphQL for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apollo GraphQL best used for?
- Apollo GraphQL is most often used for federating multiple backend services into one graphql api, wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption, enterprise api governance with schema checks and audit logs, reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of data. Of those, federating multiple backend services into one graphql api and wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption are not what Stainless is typically brought in for.
- What can Apollo GraphQL do that Stainless cannot?
- Apollo GraphQL covers Apollo Connectors, GraphOS Router, Schema registry, Schema checks. Stainless covers SDK generation, MCP server generation, Docs site generation, Webhooks and streaming support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apollo GraphQL: What does Apollo GraphQL cost?
The Free plan supports up to 3 developers at no cost. Developer plan starts at $5 per million requests with a $50 signup credit, while Standard and Enterprise require contacting sales for custom pricing.
SourceStainless: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes. The Free plan supports up to 5 generators, 5 seats, APIs with 25 or fewer endpoints, and 100 preview builds per month, with email support.
SourceApollo GraphQL: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the Free 'Forever Free' plan supports up to 3 developers, 1-day data retention for checks and insights, and a self-hosted router capped at 60 requests per minute.
SourceStainless: Who owns the generated SDK code?
The generated SDK code is owned by the customer and published by Stainless under the Apache 2.0 license.
SourceApollo GraphQL: How is usage metered on paid plans?
Standard requests are billed per million operations with tiered volume discounts, starting at $5.00/million for the first 250M and dropping to $3.00/million beyond 5B, with similar tiered pricing for subscription update events.
SourceStainless: What happens if I exceed my plan's endpoint limit?
Customers exceeding their endpoint limits are billed per SDK, per endpoint, per month for the overage.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apollo GraphQL
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Apollo GraphQL vs Appwrite
- Apollo GraphQL vs Hasura
- Apollo GraphQL vs PocketBase
- Apollo GraphQL vs Sanity
- Apollo GraphQL vs Apigee
- Apollo GraphQL vs Ably
- Apollo GraphQL vs Pusher
- Apollo GraphQL vs Kong Gateway
- Apollo GraphQL vs PubNub
- Apollo GraphQL vs Treblle
- Apollo GraphQL vs Bruno
- Apollo GraphQL vs KeystoneJS
- Apollo GraphQL vs Moesif
- Apollo GraphQL vs Parse Server
- Apollo GraphQL vs Stoplight
- Apollo GraphQL vs Strapi
- Apollo GraphQL vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Stainless vs Appwrite
- Stainless vs Hasura
- Stainless vs PocketBase
- Stainless vs Sanity
- Stainless vs Apigee
- Stainless vs Ably
- Stainless vs Pusher
- Stainless vs Kong Gateway
- Stainless vs PubNub
- Stainless vs Treblle
- Stainless vs Bruno
- Stainless vs KeystoneJS
- Stainless vs Moesif
- Stainless vs Parse Server
- Stainless vs Stoplight
- Stainless vs Strapi
- Stainless vs Swagger/OpenAPI
