Databases · head to head
Apache Solr vs Greenhouse

Apache Solr
Databases
Enterprise search platform built on Apache Lucene
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Apache Solr has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Apache Solr xML-heavy configuration and a developer experience that feels dated beside newer engines; Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- They diverge on capability: Apache Solr covers Lucene-based indexing, Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Solr and Greenhouse actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Solr | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Web, Ios, Android, Api |
| Category | Databases | Technology |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Solr
- Lucene-based indexing
- Faceted search
- SolrCloud
- Schema control
Only in Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking
- Interview scheduling
- Scorecard system
- Job board posting
- Candidate CRM
- Reporting & analytics
- Offer management
- EEO compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Solr
- Library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is centralnot Greenhouse
- Long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over noveltynot Greenhouse
- Search requiring precise, explicitly configured relevance tuningnot Greenhouse
Greenhouse
- Enterprise hiring and recruiting automationnot Apache Solr
- Multi-location and multi-team talent acquisitionnot Apache Solr
- Structured interview process managementnot Apache Solr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Solr
- XML-heavy configuration and a developer experience that feels dated beside newer engines
- SolrCloud depends on ZooKeeper, adding a component Elasticsearch removed years ago
- Smaller mindshare now, so newer tutorials, hiring and integrations favour Elasticsearch
- Considerably heavier than a purpose-built application search engine
Greenhouse
- Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
- Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
- Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
- Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
- Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Solr
Free- Apache SolrFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Greenhouse
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Solr if
- You need lucene-based indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want faceted search.
Choose Greenhouse if
- You need applicant tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want interview scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Solr or Greenhouse better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Solr starts at Free and Greenhouse at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Solr or Greenhouse?
- Apache Solr has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Apache Solr and On request for Greenhouse.
- Does Apache Solr or Greenhouse run on more platforms?
- Apache Solr runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- Can I use Apache Solr for free?
- Yes. Apache Solr has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Greenhouse starts at On request.
- What is Apache Solr best used for?
- Apache Solr is most often used for library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is central, long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over novelty, search requiring precise, explicitly configured relevance tuning. Of those, library, archive and catalogue search where faceting is central and long-lived enterprise deployments valuing stability over novelty are not what Greenhouse is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Solr do that Greenhouse cannot?
- Apache Solr covers Lucene-based indexing, Faceted search, SolrCloud, Schema control. Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Solr: Is Apache Solr free?
Yes, open source under the Apache Software Foundation.
Greenhouse: How much does Greenhouse cost?
Greenhouse does not publish specific pricing. The company states that pricing is customized based on your hiring needs, hiring volume, organizational complexity, and required features.
SourceApache Solr: Solr or Elasticsearch?
Both are built on Lucene. Elasticsearch has the larger ecosystem and a friendlier API; Solr is very mature and strong on faceted search, and remains common in library and catalogue systems.
Greenhouse: What are the Greenhouse pricing tiers?
Greenhouse offers three plan levels: Core (basic hiring structure), Plus (multi-location optimization), and Pro (complex enterprise hiring). Exact pricing requires contacting Greenhouse for a custom quote.
SourceApache Solr: Is Solr still maintained?
Yes, actively, as a top-level Apache project.
Greenhouse: Do all Greenhouse tiers include the same features?
No. Core includes sourcing and scheduling, Plus adds automation and texting, and Pro adds enterprise data configuration and audit logs. All tiers can be customized.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Solr
Other head to heads
- Apache Solr vs Meilisearch
- Apache Solr vs OpenSearch
- Apache Solr vs Elasticsearch
- Apache Solr vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Solr vs Typesense
- Apache Solr vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Solr vs Solace PubSub+
- Apache Solr vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Solr vs Couchbase
- Apache Solr vs MariaDB
- Apache Solr vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Apache Solr vs IBM Db2
- Apache Solr vs Marqo
- Apache Solr vs Nile
- Apache Solr vs Ninox
- Apache Solr vs Presto
- Apache Solr vs Privacera
- Apache Solr vs RavenDB
- Apache Solr vs Linear
- Apache Solr vs Asana
- Apache Solr vs ClickUp
- Apache Solr vs Figma
- Apache Solr vs Aha!
- Apache Solr vs Okta
- Apache Solr vs Eclipse
- Apache Solr vs Postgres
- Apache Solr vs Amplitude
- Apache Solr vs Mixpanel
- Apache Solr vs Pendo
- Apache Solr vs PostHog
- Apache Solr vs Postman
- Apache Solr vs Raycast
- Apache Solr vs Superhuman
- Apache Solr vs Vim
- Apache Solr vs Whimsical
- Apache Solr vs Apache Hadoop
- Greenhouse vs Meilisearch
- Greenhouse vs OpenSearch
- Greenhouse vs Elasticsearch
- Greenhouse vs PostgreSQL
- Greenhouse vs Typesense
- Greenhouse vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Greenhouse vs Solace PubSub+
- Greenhouse vs RabbitMQ
- Greenhouse vs Couchbase
- Greenhouse vs MariaDB
- Greenhouse vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Greenhouse vs IBM Db2
- Greenhouse vs Marqo
- Greenhouse vs Nile
- Greenhouse vs Ninox
- Greenhouse vs Presto
- Greenhouse vs Privacera
- Greenhouse vs RavenDB
- Greenhouse vs Linear
- Greenhouse vs Asana
- Greenhouse vs ClickUp
- Greenhouse vs Figma
- Greenhouse vs Aha!
- Greenhouse vs Okta
- Greenhouse vs Eclipse
- Greenhouse vs Postgres
- Greenhouse vs Amplitude
- Greenhouse vs Mixpanel
- Greenhouse vs Pendo
- Greenhouse vs PostHog
- Greenhouse vs Postman
- Greenhouse vs Raycast
- Greenhouse vs Superhuman
- Greenhouse vs Vim
- Greenhouse vs Whimsical
- Greenhouse vs Apache Hadoop

