Databases · head to head
Apache Pulsar vs Milvus

Apache Pulsar
Databases
Cloud-native messaging and streaming with separated storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Milvus
Machine Learning
Open-source vector database for scalable similarity search
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Pulsar more components than Kafka: brokers, BookKeeper and ZooKeeper each need operating; Milvus vector dimensions are capped at 32,768
- They diverge on capability: Apache Pulsar covers Separated storage, Milvus covers Billion-scale vectors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Pulsar and Milvus actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Pulsar | Milvus |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Linux, Mac, Windows, Web |
| Category | Databases | Machine Learning |
| Founded | Unknown | 2017 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Pulsar
- Separated storage
- Queuing and streaming
- Built-in multi-tenancy
- Geo-replication
Only in Milvus
- Billion-scale vectors
- Multiple index types
- GPU acceleration
- Hybrid search
- Data partitioning
- PyTorch
- TensorFlow
- Hugging Face
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Pulsar
- Platforms needing both work queues and replayable streams without running two systemsnot Milvus
- Multi-tenant messaging where isolation between teams is a requirementnot Milvus
- Deployments where storage and traffic grow at genuinely different ratesnot Milvus
Milvus
- Self hosting a vector database for semantic searchnot Apache Pulsar
- Storing and querying embeddings for retrieval augmented generationnot Apache Pulsar
- Similarity search over images, audio or text at scalenot Apache Pulsar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Pulsar
- More components than Kafka: brokers, BookKeeper and ZooKeeper each need operating
- Correspondingly harder to run well, and the expertise is rarer than Kafka expertise
- A much smaller ecosystem of connectors, tooling and hiring pool than Kafka
- The architectural advantages only pay off at a scale most deployments never reach
Milvus
- Vector dimensions are capped at 32,768
- A collection is limited to 64 fields, 1,024 partitions and 16 shards
- Only 1 index is allowed per field
- Search returns at most 16,384 vectors as top-k, and nq is capped at 16,384
- Input and output per RPC is capped at 64 MB for insert, search and query
- VARCHAR values are limited to 65,535 characters
- Data loaded into query nodes cannot exceed 90% of available memory
- An instance supports at most 65,536 collections
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Pulsar
Free- Apache PulsarFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Milvus
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full features
- Self-hosted
- Community support
- Zilliz CloudFree
- Managed service
- Free tier available
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Pulsar if
- You need separated storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want queuing and streaming.
Choose Milvus if
- You need billion-scale vectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- You also want multiple index types.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Pulsar or Milvus better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Pulsar starts at Free and Milvus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Pulsar or Milvus?
- Apache Pulsar starts at Free and Milvus at Free.
- Does Apache Pulsar or Milvus run on more platforms?
- Apache Pulsar runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Milvus runs on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- Can I use Apache Pulsar for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Pulsar best used for?
- Apache Pulsar is most often used for platforms needing both work queues and replayable streams without running two systems, multi-tenant messaging where isolation between teams is a requirement, deployments where storage and traffic grow at genuinely different rates. Of those, platforms needing both work queues and replayable streams without running two systems and multi-tenant messaging where isolation between teams is a requirement are not what Milvus is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Pulsar do that Milvus cannot?
- Apache Pulsar covers Separated storage, Queuing and streaming, Built-in multi-tenancy, Geo-replication. Milvus covers Billion-scale vectors, Multiple index types, GPU acceleration, Hybrid search.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Pulsar: Is Apache Pulsar free?
Yes, open source under the Apache Software Foundation.
Milvus: How much does Milvus cost?
Milvus is open-source and free to use and modify. The self-hosted version has no licensing cost. Zilliz Cloud (the managed SaaS version) does not publish pricing on the website.
SourceApache Pulsar: Pulsar or Kafka?
Pulsar separates storage from compute and covers queuing and streaming in one system. Kafka has a far larger ecosystem and hiring pool. Most teams should have a specific reason before choosing Pulsar.
Milvus: Is there a free or open-source version of Milvus?
Yes, Milvus is fully open-source and available for free. Milvus Lite is a lightweight option for learning and prototyping that can be installed via pip.
SourceApache Pulsar: Why does separated storage matter?
Brokers hold no data, so adding or replacing one requires no rebalancing, and storage can grow without adding serving capacity.
Milvus: Does Milvus offer a managed cloud service?
Yes, Zilliz Cloud is a fully managed Milvus cloud offering with serverless and dedicated cluster options. Pricing must be requested from the company as it is not listed on the public website.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Pulsar
Other head to heads
- Apache Pulsar vs NATS
- Apache Pulsar vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Pulsar vs Solace PubSub+
- Apache Pulsar vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Pulsar vs Redpanda
- Apache Pulsar vs Timeplus
- Apache Pulsar vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Pulsar vs ClickHouse
- Apache Pulsar vs DuckDB
- Apache Pulsar vs Estuary
- Apache Pulsar vs Memcached
- Apache Pulsar vs SingleStore
- Apache Pulsar vs Vitess
- Apache Pulsar vs Aiven
- Apache Pulsar vs BigQuery
- Apache Pulsar vs CosmosDB
- Apache Pulsar vs DataStax
- Apache Pulsar vs dbt
- Apache Pulsar vs Google Vertex AI
- Apache Pulsar vs AWS SageMaker
- Apache Pulsar vs Azure Machine Learning
- Apache Pulsar vs DataRobot
- Apache Pulsar vs Pinecone
- Apache Pulsar vs Weaviate
- Apache Pulsar vs Ray
- Apache Pulsar vs Fal AI
- Apache Pulsar vs Jupyter
- Apache Pulsar vs Keras
- Apache Pulsar vs LangChain
- Apache Pulsar vs Weights & Biases
- Apache Pulsar vs Alteryx
- Apache Pulsar vs Anaconda
- Apache Pulsar vs Domino Data Lab
- Apache Pulsar vs DVC
- Apache Pulsar vs Semantic Kernel
- Milvus vs NATS
- Milvus vs RabbitMQ
- Milvus vs Solace PubSub+
- Milvus vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Milvus vs Redpanda
- Milvus vs Timeplus
- Milvus vs PostgreSQL
- Milvus vs ClickHouse
- Milvus vs DuckDB
- Milvus vs Estuary
- Milvus vs Memcached
- Milvus vs SingleStore
- Milvus vs Vitess
- Milvus vs Aiven
- Milvus vs BigQuery
- Milvus vs CosmosDB
- Milvus vs DataStax
- Milvus vs dbt
- Milvus vs Google Vertex AI
- Milvus vs AWS SageMaker
- Milvus vs Azure Machine Learning
- Milvus vs DataRobot
- Milvus vs Pinecone
- Milvus vs Weaviate
- Milvus vs Ray
- Milvus vs Fal AI
- Milvus vs Jupyter
- Milvus vs Keras
- Milvus vs LangChain
- Milvus vs Weights & Biases
- Milvus vs Alteryx
- Milvus vs Anaconda
- Milvus vs Domino Data Lab
- Milvus vs DVC
- Milvus vs Semantic Kernel
