Web Development · head to head
Apache HTTP Server vs OpenEBS

Apache HTTP Server
Web Development
The world's most used web server software
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache HTTP Server process-based or thread-based architecture consumes more memory per connection than nginx's event-driven model; OpenEBS there is no vendor on the other end of an incident unless you separately contract DataCore, so an outage at three in the morning is resolved by your own team and a public Slack channel.
- They diverge on capability: Apache HTTP Server covers HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 support, OpenEBS covers Replicated engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache HTTP Server and OpenEBS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache HTTP Server | OpenEBS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix-like systems | Linux |
| Category | Web Development | Cloud |
| Founded | 1995 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache HTTP Server
- HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 support
- Virtual hosting
- SSL/TLS encryption
- URL rewriting
- Load balancing
- Compression
- Authentication modules
- Logging and monitoring
Only in OpenEBS
- Replicated engine
- Local PV engines
- Kubernetes-native management
- Snapshots and clones
- No licence fee
- Hardware independence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache HTTP Server
- Web hostingnot OpenEBS
- Static site servingnot OpenEBS
- Reverse proxynot OpenEBS
- Load balancingnot OpenEBS
- SSL terminationnot OpenEBS
- Content deliverynot OpenEBS
OpenEBS
- Running Cassandra or Kafka on Kubernetes where the application already replicates and node-local volumes are sufficientnot Apache HTTP Server
- A platform team that needs persistent volumes on bare metal Kubernetes without a per node subscriptionnot Apache HTTP Server
- An edge or lab deployment where a commercial storage licence cannot be justifiednot Apache HTTP Server
- Replacing hostpath volumes with something that has snapshots and a Container Storage Interface drivernot Apache HTTP Server
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache HTTP Server
- Process-based or thread-based architecture consumes more memory per connection than nginx's event-driven model
- Static file serving performance lags behind nginx, particularly under high concurrency
- Module system flexibility can add overhead compared to nginx's streamlined single-purpose design
- Configuration complexity for advanced features like reverse proxying is higher than nginx
- Performance monitoring in hybrid and cloud environments requires additional tools beyond built-in diagnostics
OpenEBS
- There is no vendor on the other end of an incident unless you separately contract DataCore, so an outage at three in the morning is resolved by your own team and a public Slack channel.
- The project has several storage engines with different maturity and different operational characteristics, and choosing the wrong one for your workload produces poor results that look like a product failure.
- Documentation and upgrade guidance assume real Kubernetes storage knowledge, so teams without that expertise underestimate the operational load they are taking on.
- Project governance shifted after DataCore acquired MayaData in 2021, which means the direction of a supposedly neutral project is influenced by one commercial sponsor.
- Disaster recovery, cross-cluster replication and policy-driven data services are thinner than in the commercial alternatives, so organisations with those requirements end up building them or buying a product anyway.
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache HTTP Server
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Apache HTTP Server review.
OpenEBS
Free- OpenEBSFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed
- All storage engines included
- No node or capacity limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache HTTP Server if
- You need http/1.1 and http/2 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix-like systems.
- You also want virtual hosting.
Choose OpenEBS if
- You need replicated engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want local pv engines.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache HTTP Server or OpenEBS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache HTTP Server starts at Free and OpenEBS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache HTTP Server or OpenEBS?
- Apache HTTP Server starts at Free and OpenEBS at Free.
- Does Apache HTTP Server or OpenEBS run on more platforms?
- Apache HTTP Server runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix-like systems. OpenEBS runs on Linux.
- Can I use Apache HTTP Server for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache HTTP Server best used for?
- Apache HTTP Server is most often used for web hosting, static site serving, reverse proxy, load balancing. Of those, web hosting and static site serving are not what OpenEBS is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache HTTP Server do that OpenEBS cannot?
- Apache HTTP Server covers HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 support, Virtual hosting, SSL/TLS encryption, URL rewriting. OpenEBS covers Replicated engine, Local PV engines, Kubernetes-native management, Snapshots and clones.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache HTTP Server: Is Apache HTTP Server free?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server is free, open-source software developed by The Apache Software Foundation. There are no licensing fees for any edition.
SourceOpenEBS: Who supports it in production?
The project is community supported. Commercial support is available from DataCore, which acquired the original sponsor MayaData in 2021. Establish that relationship before production, not during an incident.
Apache HTTP Server: What is the latest stable version of Apache HTTP Server?
Apache httpd 2.4.68, released June 8, 2026, is the latest stable version from the 2.4.x branch and is recommended for all users. Apache httpd 2.2 is end-of-life (final release July 2017).
SourceOpenEBS: Which engine should we use?
If your application replicates its own data, use a Local engine and avoid replicating twice. If it does not, such as with PostgreSQL, use the Replicated engine.
Apache HTTP Server: Does Apache support .htaccess configuration files?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server supports per-directory .htaccess configuration files, allowing configuration without modifying the main Apache configuration file. This flexibility is a key differentiator from nginx.
SourceOpenEBS: Does it cost anything?
No licence fee. The cost is operational, and a support contract if you want someone accountable.
Apache HTTP Server: How many Apache modules are available?
Apache includes 100+ modules for functionality like URL rewriting, reverse proxying, load balancing, caching, authentication, and scripting. Modules can be compiled statically or loaded dynamically at runtime using mod_so.
SourceApache HTTP Server: Can Apache run on Linux?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server is fully supported on Linux (Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu), Windows Server, macOS, and Unix-like systems.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache HTTP Server
Other head to heads
- Apache HTTP Server vs Nginx
- Apache HTTP Server vs MySQL
- Apache HTTP Server vs MUI
- Apache HTTP Server vs Docusaurus
- Apache HTTP Server vs Bootstrap
- Apache HTTP Server vs Radix UI
- Apache HTTP Server vs shadcn/ui
- Apache HTTP Server vs Chakra UI
- Apache HTTP Server vs esbuild
- Apache HTTP Server vs Drupal
- Apache HTTP Server vs Lit
- Apache HTTP Server vs Preact
- Apache HTTP Server vs Qwik
- Apache HTTP Server vs Rollup
- Apache HTTP Server vs Ruby on Rails
- Apache HTTP Server vs Sass
- Apache HTTP Server vs SolidJS
- Apache HTTP Server vs Portworx
- Apache HTTP Server vs Rancher
- Apache HTTP Server vs Longhorn
- Apache HTTP Server vs DigitalOcean
- Apache HTTP Server vs Podman
- Apache HTTP Server vs Qovery
- Apache HTTP Server vs Caddy
- Apache HTTP Server vs Cerebrium
- Apache HTTP Server vs DeepInfra
- Apache HTTP Server vs Go
- Apache HTTP Server vs Proxmox VE
- Apache HTTP Server vs K3s
- Apache HTTP Server vs Rook
- Apache HTTP Server vs containerd
- Apache HTTP Server vs minikube
- Apache HTTP Server vs Cilium
- Apache HTTP Server vs Flux
- Apache HTTP Server vs Linkerd
- OpenEBS vs Nginx
- OpenEBS vs MySQL
- OpenEBS vs MUI
- OpenEBS vs Docusaurus
- OpenEBS vs Bootstrap
- OpenEBS vs Radix UI
- OpenEBS vs shadcn/ui
- OpenEBS vs Chakra UI
- OpenEBS vs esbuild
- OpenEBS vs Drupal
- OpenEBS vs Lit
- OpenEBS vs Preact
- OpenEBS vs Qwik
- OpenEBS vs Rollup
- OpenEBS vs Ruby on Rails
- OpenEBS vs Sass
- OpenEBS vs SolidJS
- OpenEBS vs Portworx
- OpenEBS vs Rancher
- OpenEBS vs Longhorn
- OpenEBS vs DigitalOcean
- OpenEBS vs Podman
- OpenEBS vs Qovery
- OpenEBS vs Caddy
- OpenEBS vs Cerebrium
- OpenEBS vs DeepInfra
- OpenEBS vs Go
- OpenEBS vs Proxmox VE
- OpenEBS vs K3s
- OpenEBS vs Rook
- OpenEBS vs containerd
- OpenEBS vs minikube
- OpenEBS vs Cilium
- OpenEBS vs Flux
- OpenEBS vs Linkerd

