Web Development · head to head
Apache HTTP Server vs Garden

Apache HTTP Server
Web Development
The world's most used web server software
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Garden
Developer Tools
Kubernetes development and testing automation with shared caching, now owned by Incredibuild
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache HTTP Server process-based or thread-based architecture consumes more memory per connection than nginx's event-driven model; Garden incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- They diverge on capability: Apache HTTP Server covers HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 support, Garden covers Action graph.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache HTTP Server and Garden actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache HTTP Server | Garden |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix-like systems | Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes |
| Category | Web Development | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 1995 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache HTTP Server
- HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 support
- Virtual hosting
- SSL/TLS encryption
- URL rewriting
- Load balancing
- Compression
- Authentication modules
- Logging and monitoring
Only in Garden
- Action graph
- Shared result caching
- Remote Kubernetes environments
- In-cluster builds
- Same config everywhere
- Hot reload sync
- Helm and Kustomize support
- Templating
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache HTTP Server
- Web hostingnot Garden
- Static site servingnot Garden
- Reverse proxynot Garden
- Load balancingnot Garden
- SSL terminationnot Garden
- Content deliverynot Garden
Garden
- A platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loopnot Apache HTTP Server
- An organisation with thirty or more services on Kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates productionnot Apache HTTP Server
- Giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environmentnot Apache HTTP Server
- Running the identical build and test definition locally and in CI so failures reproduce on a laptopnot Apache HTTP Server
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache HTTP Server
- Process-based or thread-based architecture consumes more memory per connection than nginx's event-driven model
- Static file serving performance lags behind nginx, particularly under high concurrency
- Module system flexibility can add overhead compared to nginx's streamlined single-purpose design
- Configuration complexity for advanced features like reverse proxying is higher than nginx
- Performance monitoring in hybrid and cloud environments requires additional tools beyond built-in diagnostics
Garden
- Incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- It is tightly bound to Kubernetes, so teams running on ECS, Nomad, plain VMs or serverless get little from it and would need a different tool entirely.
- The YAML action graph is a real configuration surface: a large monorepo needs someone to own and maintain Garden config as a first-class artefact, which is a standing platform-engineering cost.
- Shared remote environments mean every developer needs cluster access and a cost allocation model, so cloud spend rises and namespace sprawl becomes a thing you have to police.
- Caching correctness depends on declaring dependencies accurately; an under-declared action will serve a stale cached pass and hide a genuine test failure, which is a hard class of bug to notice.
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache HTTP Server
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Apache HTTP Server review.
Garden
Free- Garden open sourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed CLI
- Full action graph and caching
- Self-managed clusters
- Commercial tier$undefined/year
- Hosted caching and team features
- Support and onboarding
- Pricing no longer published since the Incredibuild acquisition
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache HTTP Server if
- You need http/1.1 and http/2 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix-like systems.
- You also want virtual hosting.
Choose Garden if
- You need action graph.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- You also want shared result caching.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache HTTP Server or Garden better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache HTTP Server starts at Free and Garden at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache HTTP Server or Garden?
- Apache HTTP Server starts at Free and Garden at Free.
- Does Apache HTTP Server or Garden run on more platforms?
- Apache HTTP Server runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix-like systems. Garden runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Apache HTTP Server for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache HTTP Server best used for?
- Apache HTTP Server is most often used for web hosting, static site serving, reverse proxy, load balancing. Of those, web hosting and static site serving are not what Garden is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache HTTP Server do that Garden cannot?
- Apache HTTP Server covers HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 support, Virtual hosting, SSL/TLS encryption, URL rewriting. Garden covers Action graph, Shared result caching, Remote Kubernetes environments, In-cluster builds.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache HTTP Server: Is Apache HTTP Server free?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server is free, open-source software developed by The Apache Software Foundation. There are no licensing fees for any edition.
SourceGarden: Is Garden still maintained?
The open source project remains on GitHub under Incredibuild ownership, but the commercial pricing page redirects to the docs and there is no public paid offer.
Apache HTTP Server: What is the latest stable version of Apache HTTP Server?
Apache httpd 2.4.68, released June 8, 2026, is the latest stable version from the 2.4.x branch and is recommended for all users. Apache httpd 2.2 is end-of-life (final release July 2017).
SourceGarden: Do I need Kubernetes?
Effectively yes. Garden is built around Kubernetes environments and offers little to teams on other runtimes.
Apache HTTP Server: Does Apache support .htaccess configuration files?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server supports per-directory .htaccess configuration files, allowing configuration without modifying the main Apache configuration file. This flexibility is a key differentiator from nginx.
SourceGarden: Does it replace my CI system?
No. It runs inside GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or similar and speeds up what those pipelines execute.
Apache HTTP Server: How many Apache modules are available?
Apache includes 100+ modules for functionality like URL rewriting, reverse proxying, load balancing, caching, authentication, and scripting. Modules can be compiled statically or loaded dynamically at runtime using mod_so.
SourceGarden: What is the actual saving?
It comes from skipping builds and tests whose inputs have not changed, so the benefit scales with how many services you have and how often only a few change.
Apache HTTP Server: Can Apache run on Linux?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server is fully supported on Linux (Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu), Windows Server, macOS, and Unix-like systems.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache HTTP Server
Other head to heads
- Apache HTTP Server vs Nginx
- Apache HTTP Server vs MySQL
- Apache HTTP Server vs MUI
- Apache HTTP Server vs Docusaurus
- Apache HTTP Server vs Bootstrap
- Apache HTTP Server vs Radix UI
- Apache HTTP Server vs shadcn/ui
- Apache HTTP Server vs Chakra UI
- Apache HTTP Server vs esbuild
- Apache HTTP Server vs Drupal
- Apache HTTP Server vs Lit
- Apache HTTP Server vs Preact
- Apache HTTP Server vs Qwik
- Apache HTTP Server vs Rollup
- Apache HTTP Server vs Ruby on Rails
- Apache HTTP Server vs Sass
- Apache HTTP Server vs SolidJS
- Apache HTTP Server vs Okteto
- Apache HTTP Server vs Ansible
- Apache HTTP Server vs Depot
- Apache HTTP Server vs Earthly
- Apache HTTP Server vs Tilt
- Apache HTTP Server vs WarpBuild
- Apache HTTP Server vs Nix
- Apache HTTP Server vs Blacksmith
- Apache HTTP Server vs Namespace
- Apache HTTP Server vs ConfigCat
- Apache HTTP Server vs OpsLevel
- Apache HTTP Server vs Bazel
- Apache HTTP Server vs Visual Studio
- Apache HTTP Server vs Warp
- Apache HTTP Server vs Xlinesoft
- Apache HTTP Server vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Apache HTTP Server vs GNU Emacs
- Apache HTTP Server vs Keil MDK
- Garden vs Nginx
- Garden vs MySQL
- Garden vs MUI
- Garden vs Docusaurus
- Garden vs Bootstrap
- Garden vs Radix UI
- Garden vs shadcn/ui
- Garden vs Chakra UI
- Garden vs esbuild
- Garden vs Drupal
- Garden vs Lit
- Garden vs Preact
- Garden vs Qwik
- Garden vs Rollup
- Garden vs Ruby on Rails
- Garden vs Sass
- Garden vs SolidJS
- Garden vs Okteto
- Garden vs Ansible
- Garden vs Depot
- Garden vs Earthly
- Garden vs Tilt
- Garden vs WarpBuild
- Garden vs Nix
- Garden vs Blacksmith
- Garden vs Namespace
- Garden vs ConfigCat
- Garden vs OpsLevel
- Garden vs Bazel
- Garden vs Visual Studio
- Garden vs Warp
- Garden vs Xlinesoft
- Garden vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Garden vs GNU Emacs
- Garden vs Keil MDK
