Software · head to head
Apache HTTP Server vs Deno Deploy
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache HTTP Server process-based or thread-based architecture consumes more memory per connection than nginx's event-driven model; Deno Deploy smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations
- They diverge on capability: Apache HTTP Server covers HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 support, Deno Deploy covers Edge Functions.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache HTTP Server and Deno Deploy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache HTTP Server | Deno Deploy |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix-like systems | Cloud/Web |
| Founded | 1995 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache HTTP Server
- HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 support
- Virtual hosting
- SSL/TLS encryption
- URL rewriting
- Load balancing
- Compression
- Authentication modules
- Logging and monitoring
Only in Deno Deploy
- Edge Functions
- Deno KV
- Automatic HTTPS
- Global Distribution
- Zero Config Deploy
- Git Integration
- Instant Rollbacks
- Web Standard APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache HTTP Server
- Web hostingnot Deno Deploy
- Static site servingnot Deno Deploy
- Reverse proxynot Deno Deploy
- Load balancingnot Deno Deploy
- SSL terminationnot Deno Deploy
- Content deliverynot Deno Deploy
Deno Deploy
- API endpointsnot Apache HTTP Server
- Edge functionsnot Apache HTTP Server
- Static sitesnot Apache HTTP Server
- Real-time appsnot Apache HTTP Server
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache HTTP Server
- Process-based or thread-based architecture consumes more memory per connection than nginx's event-driven model
- Static file serving performance lags behind nginx, particularly under high concurrency
- Module system flexibility can add overhead compared to nginx's streamlined single-purpose design
- Configuration complexity for advanced features like reverse proxying is higher than nginx
- Performance monitoring in hybrid and cloud environments requires additional tools beyond built-in diagnostics
Deno Deploy
- Smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations
- Less mature than established serverless platforms; newer company and platform
- 1GB deployment size limit may restrict larger applications
- 512MB memory limit lower than some competitors for memory-intensive workloads
- Smaller user base and community compared to Lambda or Netlify
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache HTTP Server
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Apache HTTP Server review.
Deno Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 1M requests/month
- 100GB outbound bandwidth
- 50ms CPU time per request
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited requests
- 5GB KV storage
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache HTTP Server if
- You need http/1.1 and http/2 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix-like systems.
- You also want virtual hosting.
Choose Deno Deploy if
- You need edge functions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud/Web.
- You also want deno kv.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache HTTP Server or Deno Deploy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache HTTP Server starts at Free and Deno Deploy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache HTTP Server or Deno Deploy?
- Apache HTTP Server starts at Free and Deno Deploy at Free.
- Does Apache HTTP Server or Deno Deploy run on more platforms?
- Apache HTTP Server runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix-like systems. Deno Deploy runs on Cloud/Web.
- Can I use Apache HTTP Server for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache HTTP Server best used for?
- Apache HTTP Server is most often used for web hosting, static site serving, reverse proxy, load balancing. Of those, web hosting and static site serving are not what Deno Deploy is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache HTTP Server do that Deno Deploy cannot?
- Apache HTTP Server covers HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 support, Virtual hosting, SSL/TLS encryption, URL rewriting. Deno Deploy covers Edge Functions, Deno KV, Automatic HTTPS, Global Distribution.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache HTTP Server: Is Apache HTTP Server free?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server is free, open-source software developed by The Apache Software Foundation. There are no licensing fees for any edition.
SourceDeno Deploy: What does Deno Deploy's free tier include?
Deno Deploy free tier includes 1 million requests per month, 100 GB of outbound bandwidth, 50 milliseconds of CPU time per request, 50 custom domains, 1 GiB of KV storage, and up to 5 team members.
SourceApache HTTP Server: What is the latest stable version of Apache HTTP Server?
Apache httpd 2.4.68, released June 8, 2026, is the latest stable version from the 2.4.x branch and is recommended for all users. Apache httpd 2.2 is end-of-life (final release July 2017).
SourceDeno Deploy: What are Deno Deploy's Pro plan features and pricing?
Deno Deploy Pro costs $20/month and removes request limits, increases KV storage to 5GB, and includes priority support. Additional storage beyond 5GB costs $0.75/GiB.
SourceApache HTTP Server: Does Apache support .htaccess configuration files?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server supports per-directory .htaccess configuration files, allowing configuration without modifying the main Apache configuration file. This flexibility is a key differentiator from nginx.
SourceDeno Deploy: What are the deployment size and memory limits for Deno Deploy?
The total size of all files within a deployment (source files and static files) should not exceed 1 gigabyte. Applications have a maximum memory allocation of 512MB.
SourceApache HTTP Server: How many Apache modules are available?
Apache includes 100+ modules for functionality like URL rewriting, reverse proxying, load balancing, caching, authentication, and scripting. Modules can be compiled statically or loaded dynamically at runtime using mod_so.
SourceDeno Deploy: Does Deno Deploy support TypeScript natively?
Yes. Deno Deploy runs TypeScript natively with zero-configuration TypeScript support. Code can be written in TypeScript or JavaScript and runs on the same V8 engine.
SourceApache HTTP Server: Can Apache run on Linux?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server is fully supported on Linux (Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu), Windows Server, macOS, and Unix-like systems.
SourceDeno Deploy: What security features does Deno Deploy provide?
Deno Deploy features an opt-in permission system to mitigate supply chain attacks. Permissions can be explicitly granted for file, network, and environment access, running code securely by default.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache HTTP Server
More on Deno Deploy
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Apache HTTP Server vs Django
- Apache HTTP Server vs MySQL
- Apache HTTP Server vs Next.js
- Apache HTTP Server vs Flask
- Apache HTTP Server vs Laravel
- Apache HTTP Server vs npm
- Apache HTTP Server vs React
- Apache HTTP Server vs Vue.js
- Apache HTTP Server vs Nginx
- Apache HTTP Server vs Node.js
- Apache HTTP Server vs v0 by Vercel
- Apache HTTP Server vs Astro
- Apache HTTP Server vs Bolt.new
- Apache HTTP Server vs Carrd
- Apache HTTP Server vs .NET
- Apache HTTP Server vs Express.js
- Apache HTTP Server vs FastAPI
- Apache HTTP Server vs NestJS
- Apache HTTP Server vs Grafana Cloud
- Apache HTTP Server vs Neon
- Apache HTTP Server vs DigitalOcean
- Apache HTTP Server vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Apache HTTP Server vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Apache HTTP Server vs Heroku
- Apache HTTP Server vs Hetzner Cloud
- Apache HTTP Server vs Linode
- Apache HTTP Server vs Packer
- Apache HTTP Server vs Pulumi
- Apache HTTP Server vs Render
- Apache HTTP Server vs Upstash
- Apache HTTP Server vs Vagrant
- Apache HTTP Server vs Vultr
- Apache HTTP Server vs Akamai
- Apache HTTP Server vs Alibaba Cloud
- Apache HTTP Server vs Chef
- Apache HTTP Server vs Contabo
- Deno Deploy vs Django
- Deno Deploy vs MySQL
- Deno Deploy vs Next.js
- Deno Deploy vs Flask
- Deno Deploy vs Laravel
- Deno Deploy vs npm
- Deno Deploy vs React
- Deno Deploy vs Vue.js
- Deno Deploy vs Nginx
- Deno Deploy vs Node.js
- Deno Deploy vs v0 by Vercel
- Deno Deploy vs Astro
- Deno Deploy vs Bolt.new
- Deno Deploy vs Carrd
- Deno Deploy vs .NET
- Deno Deploy vs Express.js
- Deno Deploy vs FastAPI
- Deno Deploy vs NestJS
- Deno Deploy vs Grafana Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Neon
- Deno Deploy vs DigitalOcean
- Deno Deploy vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Deno Deploy vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Deno Deploy vs Heroku
- Deno Deploy vs Hetzner Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Linode
- Deno Deploy vs Packer
- Deno Deploy vs Pulumi
- Deno Deploy vs Render
- Deno Deploy vs Upstash
- Deno Deploy vs Vagrant
- Deno Deploy vs Vultr
- Deno Deploy vs Akamai
- Deno Deploy vs Alibaba Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Chef
- Deno Deploy vs Contabo


