Web Development · head to head
Apache HTTP Server vs Deno
Apache HTTP Server
Web Development
The world's most used web server software
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Deno
Development Tools
A fast, open-source, fully Node-compatible JS runtime with TypeScript baked right in
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache HTTP Server process-based or thread-based architecture consumes more memory per connection than nginx's event-driven model; Deno the runtime itself is MIT licensed per the project's GitHub repository (denoland/deno LICENSE.md) with no cost, but Deno Deploy's free tier caps at 1 million requests and 15 CPU hours per month, per deno.com/deploy/pricing (Aug 2026)
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache HTTP Server and Deno actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache HTTP Server | Deno |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix-like systems | Web |
| Category | Web Development | Development Tools |
| Founded | 1995 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache HTTP Server
- HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 support
- Virtual hosting
- SSL/TLS encryption
- URL rewriting
- Load balancing
- Compression
- Authentication modules
- Logging and monitoring
Only in Deno
Nothing recorded that Apache HTTP Server does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache HTTP Server
- Web hostingnot Deno
- Static site servingnot Deno
- Reverse proxynot Deno
- Load balancingnot Deno
- SSL terminationnot Deno
- Content deliverynot Deno
Deno
No use cases recorded yet. See the Deno review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache HTTP Server
- Process-based or thread-based architecture consumes more memory per connection than nginx's event-driven model
- Static file serving performance lags behind nginx, particularly under high concurrency
- Module system flexibility can add overhead compared to nginx's streamlined single-purpose design
- Configuration complexity for advanced features like reverse proxying is higher than nginx
- Performance monitoring in hybrid and cloud environments requires additional tools beyond built-in diagnostics
Deno
- The runtime itself is MIT licensed per the project's GitHub repository (denoland/deno LICENSE.md) with no cost, but Deno Deploy's free tier caps at 1 million requests and 15 CPU hours per month, per deno.com/deploy/pricing (Aug 2026)
- Deno Deploy Pro at $20 per month charges $2 per additional million requests and $0.05 per additional CPU hour once the included quota is exceeded, per deno.com/deploy/pricing
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache HTTP Server
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Apache HTTP Server review.
Deno
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Deno review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache HTTP Server if
- You need http/1.1 and http/2 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix-like systems.
- You also want virtual hosting.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache HTTP Server or Deno better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache HTTP Server starts at Free and Deno at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache HTTP Server or Deno?
- Apache HTTP Server starts at Free and Deno at Free.
- Does Apache HTTP Server or Deno run on more platforms?
- Apache HTTP Server runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix-like systems. Deno runs on Web.
- Can I use Apache HTTP Server for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache HTTP Server best used for?
- Apache HTTP Server is most often used for web hosting, static site serving, reverse proxy, load balancing. Of those, web hosting and static site serving are not what Deno is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache HTTP Server do that Deno cannot?
- Apache HTTP Server covers HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 support, Virtual hosting, SSL/TLS encryption, URL rewriting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache HTTP Server: Is Apache HTTP Server free?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server is free, open-source software developed by The Apache Software Foundation. There are no licensing fees for any edition.
SourceApache HTTP Server: What is the latest stable version of Apache HTTP Server?
Apache httpd 2.4.68, released June 8, 2026, is the latest stable version from the 2.4.x branch and is recommended for all users. Apache httpd 2.2 is end-of-life (final release July 2017).
SourceApache HTTP Server: Does Apache support .htaccess configuration files?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server supports per-directory .htaccess configuration files, allowing configuration without modifying the main Apache configuration file. This flexibility is a key differentiator from nginx.
SourceApache HTTP Server: How many Apache modules are available?
Apache includes 100+ modules for functionality like URL rewriting, reverse proxying, load balancing, caching, authentication, and scripting. Modules can be compiled statically or loaded dynamically at runtime using mod_so.
SourceApache HTTP Server: Can Apache run on Linux?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server is fully supported on Linux (Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu), Windows Server, macOS, and Unix-like systems.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache HTTP Server
Other head to heads
- Apache HTTP Server vs Django
- Apache HTTP Server vs MySQL
- Apache HTTP Server vs Next.js
- Apache HTTP Server vs Flask
- Apache HTTP Server vs Laravel
- Apache HTTP Server vs npm
- Apache HTTP Server vs React
- Apache HTTP Server vs Vue.js
- Apache HTTP Server vs Nginx
- Apache HTTP Server vs Node.js
- Apache HTTP Server vs v0 by Vercel
- Apache HTTP Server vs Astro
- Apache HTTP Server vs Bolt.new
- Apache HTTP Server vs Carrd
- Apache HTTP Server vs .NET
- Apache HTTP Server vs Express.js
- Apache HTTP Server vs FastAPI
- Apache HTTP Server vs NestJS
- Apache HTTP Server vs Visual Studio Code
- Apache HTTP Server vs ESLint
- Apache HTTP Server vs pnpm
- Apache HTTP Server vs Turborepo
- Apache HTTP Server vs Yarn
- Apache HTTP Server vs Ansible
- Apache HTTP Server vs Prettier
- Apache HTTP Server vs Vite
- Apache HTTP Server vs Webpack
- Apache HTTP Server vs Argo CD
- Apache HTTP Server vs Azure DevOps
- Apache HTTP Server vs Bitbucket
- Apache HTTP Server vs Buildkite
- Apache HTTP Server vs Claude Code
- Apache HTTP Server vs Cody
- Apache HTTP Server vs Fig
- Apache HTTP Server vs Git
- Apache HTTP Server vs GitHub Copilot
- Deno vs Django
- Deno vs MySQL
- Deno vs Next.js
- Deno vs Flask
- Deno vs Laravel
- Deno vs npm
- Deno vs React
- Deno vs Vue.js
- Deno vs Nginx
- Deno vs Node.js
- Deno vs v0 by Vercel
- Deno vs Astro
- Deno vs Bolt.new
- Deno vs Carrd
- Deno vs .NET
- Deno vs Express.js
- Deno vs FastAPI
- Deno vs NestJS
- Deno vs Visual Studio Code
- Deno vs ESLint
- Deno vs pnpm
- Deno vs Turborepo
- Deno vs Yarn
- Deno vs Ansible
- Deno vs Prettier
- Deno vs Vite
- Deno vs Webpack
- Deno vs Argo CD
- Deno vs Azure DevOps
- Deno vs Bitbucket
- Deno vs Buildkite
- Deno vs Claude Code
- Deno vs Cody
- Deno vs Fig
- Deno vs Git
- Deno vs GitHub Copilot