Databases · head to head
Apache Doris vs QuestDB

Apache Doris
Databases
MPP analytical database with a MySQL wire protocol and sub-second aggregation on wide tables
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Doris two competing commercial vendors, VeloDB and SelectDB, were founded by overlapping core contributors, which makes the long-term governance and roadmap of the project harder to predict than a single-sponsor project.; QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- They diverge on capability: Apache Doris covers MySQL wire protocol, QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Doris and QuestDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Doris | QuestDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | open-source |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP) |
| Founded | Unknown | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Doris
- MySQL wire protocol
- Aggregate and unique key models
- Materialised views
- Multi-catalogue federation
- Routine load from Kafka
- Compute storage separation
- Inverted indexes
- Workload groups
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Doris
- A team whose MySQL read replica can no longer serve reporting queries and wants an OLAP engine its existing drivers already speaknot QuestDB
- A real-time dashboard backend needing sub-second aggregation over billions of rows with hundreds of concurrent usersnot QuestDB
- An ad or ecommerce platform that needs updates and deletes on analytical tables, which append-only OLAP engines handle badlynot QuestDB
- A data team that wants one SQL endpoint over both internal tables and existing Hive or Iceberg tables in the lakenot QuestDB
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot Apache Doris
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot Apache Doris
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not Apache Doris
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Doris
- Two competing commercial vendors, VeloDB and SelectDB, were founded by overlapping core contributors, which makes the long-term governance and roadmap of the project harder to predict than a single-sponsor project.
- A large share of design discussion, issue reports and documentation detail originates in Chinese, so teams that do not read it get a thinner picture of known problems and workarounds.
- Operating a cluster means managing frontend and backend node roles, tablet balancing and compaction tuning, and compaction backlogs under heavy upsert load are a recurring production complaint.
- The MySQL protocol compatibility is at the wire level, not full MySQL semantics, so queries and functions still need porting and the familiarity can mislead.
- Managed cloud availability outside China and major clouds is limited compared with ClickHouse or Snowflake, so many Western adopters end up self-hosting whether they wanted to or not.
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Doris
Free- Apache DorisFree
- Apache 2.0 licence with no usage restrictions
- All engine features included
- Community support via mailing list and Slack
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Doris if
- You need mysql wire protocol.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want aggregate and unique key models.
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Doris or QuestDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Doris starts at Free and QuestDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Doris or QuestDB?
- Apache Doris starts at Free and QuestDB at Free.
- Does Apache Doris or QuestDB run on more platforms?
- Apache Doris runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Can I use Apache Doris for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Doris best used for?
- Apache Doris is most often used for a team whose mysql read replica can no longer serve reporting queries and wants an olap engine its existing drivers already speak, a real-time dashboard backend needing sub-second aggregation over billions of rows with hundreds of concurrent users, an ad or ecommerce platform that needs updates and deletes on analytical tables, which append-only olap engines handle badly, a data team that wants one sql endpoint over both internal tables and existing hive or iceberg tables in the lake. Of those, a team whose mysql read replica can no longer serve reporting queries and wants an olap engine its existing drivers already speak and a real-time dashboard backend needing sub-second aggregation over billions of rows with hundreds of concurrent users are not what QuestDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Doris do that QuestDB cannot?
- Apache Doris covers MySQL wire protocol, Aggregate and unique key models, Materialised views, Multi-catalogue federation. QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Doris: Is Apache Doris really free?
Yes, it is Apache 2.0 with no usage restrictions. The commercial products are managed services from VeloDB and SelectDB.
QuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourceApache Doris: Can I use my MySQL tools with it?
Yes, it implements the MySQL wire protocol, so clients and BI connectors attach without a new driver, though SQL semantics differ.
QuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourceApache Doris: How does it compare with ClickHouse?
Doris handles updates and high concurrency more comfortably; ClickHouse is generally faster on raw single-query scan throughput and has far wider Western support.
QuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourceApache Doris: Who maintains it?
The Apache Software Foundation project, with most committers employed by VeloDB or SelectDB.
Related pages
More on Apache Doris
Other head to heads
- Apache Doris vs ClickHouse
- Apache Doris vs StarRocks
- Apache Doris vs Tinybird
- Apache Doris vs DuckDB
- Apache Doris vs Firebolt
- Apache Doris vs Amazon Redshift
- Apache Doris vs TiDB
- Apache Doris vs BigQuery
- Apache Doris vs Canary Labs
- Apache Doris vs Dragonfly
- Apache Doris vs Dremio
- Apache Doris vs Readyset
- Apache Doris vs Fivetran HVR
- Apache Doris vs Grist
- Apache Doris vs IBM Db2
- Apache Doris vs Instaclustr
- Apache Doris vs Knack
- Apache Doris vs LanceDB
- Apache Doris vs TimescaleDB
- Apache Doris vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Doris vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Doris vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Doris vs Airtable
- Apache Doris vs Apache Flink
- Apache Doris vs OpenSearch
- Apache Doris vs NATS
- Apache Doris vs Chroma
- Apache Doris vs Cloudinary
- Apache Doris vs Convex
- Apache Doris vs Dgraph
- Apache Doris vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs StarRocks
- QuestDB vs Tinybird
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Amazon Redshift
- QuestDB vs TiDB
- QuestDB vs BigQuery
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Dremio
- QuestDB vs Readyset
- QuestDB vs Fivetran HVR
- QuestDB vs Grist
- QuestDB vs IBM Db2
- QuestDB vs Instaclustr
- QuestDB vs Knack
- QuestDB vs LanceDB
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid
