Business Intelligence · head to head
Anaplan vs PostgreSQL

Anaplan
Business Intelligence
Connected planning platform with an in-memory calculation engine for large multidimensional models
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

PostgreSQL
Databases
The world's most advanced open source relational database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only PostgreSQL has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Anaplan workspace is licensed by memory consumed, so a model that grows as the business adds SKUs, regions or scenarios generates a bill increase without a single new user being added, and teams end up optimising models for licence cost rather than clarity.; PostgreSQL requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- They diverge on capability: Anaplan covers Hyperblock calculation engine, PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Anaplan and PostgreSQL actually diverge.
| Attribute | Anaplan | PostgreSQL |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS | Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix |
| Category | Business Intelligence | Databases |
| Founded | Unknown | 1996 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Anaplan
- Hyperblock calculation engine
- Connected planning
- Scenario and versioning
- Model builder
- Anaplan PlanIQ
- Workflow and approvals
- Application lifecycle management
- Data integration
Only in PostgreSQL
- ACID Compliance
- JSON/JSONB Support
- Full-text Search
- Extensibility
- Advanced Indexing
- Partitioning
- Replication
- pgAdmin
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Anaplan
- Sales territory and quota planning across thousands of reps where a change to segmentation must reflow quota immediatelynot PostgreSQL
- Demand and supply planning at SKU and location level for a manufacturer with tens of thousands of itemsnot PostgreSQL
- Workforce planning that ties headcount, cost and capacity to a revenue plan across dozens of business unitsnot PostgreSQL
- Replacing a spreadsheet estate where the master planning model has become too large and too fragile for Excel to open reliablynot PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
- Transaction processingnot Anaplan
- Data storagenot Anaplan
- Application backendnot Anaplan
- Reportingnot Anaplan
- Data analyticsnot Anaplan
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Anaplan
- Workspace is licensed by memory consumed, so a model that grows as the business adds SKUs, regions or scenarios generates a bill increase without a single new user being added, and teams end up optimising models for licence cost rather than clarity.
- Model building requires certified Anaplan modellers using a proprietary formula language, and the labour market for that skill is small, so most customers stay dependent on a systems integrator long after go-live.
- Thoma Bravo took the company private in 2022 in a $10.7bn deal, and customers have since reported firmer renewal terms; a private-equity owner optimising for cash flow is a real factor in a multi-year planning contract.
- Native reporting and visualisation are weak for anything beyond planning grids, so most customers push data out to Power BI or Tableau for executive reporting, adding another tool and another latency point.
- Implementations are long. A connected planning programme across finance and supply chain routinely runs six to eighteen months before the first production plan, which is difficult to justify when the business wants a forecast this quarter.
PostgreSQL
- Requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- Performance tuning requires deep knowledge of database internals
- No built-in graphical admin interface; command-line tools are primary method
Pricing, plan by plan
Anaplan
On request- Anaplan$undefined/year
- Licensed by user tier and by workspace capacity
- Workspace charged on memory consumed by models, independent of user count
- Multi-year enterprise agreements are the norm
PostgreSQL
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PostgreSQL review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Anaplan if
- You need hyperblock calculation engine.
- You work on Web, iOS.
- You also want connected planning.
Choose PostgreSQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- You also want json/jsonb support.
Questions people ask
- Is Anaplan or PostgreSQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. Anaplan starts at On request and PostgreSQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Anaplan or PostgreSQL?
- PostgreSQL has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Anaplan and Free for PostgreSQL.
- Does Anaplan or PostgreSQL run on more platforms?
- Anaplan runs on Web, iOS. PostgreSQL runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- Can I use PostgreSQL for free?
- Yes. PostgreSQL has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Anaplan starts at On request.
- What is Anaplan best used for?
- Anaplan is most often used for sales territory and quota planning across thousands of reps where a change to segmentation must reflow quota immediately, demand and supply planning at sku and location level for a manufacturer with tens of thousands of items, workforce planning that ties headcount, cost and capacity to a revenue plan across dozens of business units, replacing a spreadsheet estate where the master planning model has become too large and too fragile for excel to open reliably. Of those, sales territory and quota planning across thousands of reps where a change to segmentation must reflow quota immediately and demand and supply planning at sku and location level for a manufacturer with tens of thousands of items are not what PostgreSQL is typically brought in for.
- What can Anaplan do that PostgreSQL cannot?
- Anaplan covers Hyperblock calculation engine, Connected planning, Scenario and versioning, Model builder. PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance, JSON/JSONB Support, Full-text Search, Extensibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Anaplan: Why is Anaplan expensive even when user counts are low?
Because workspace is licensed on the memory your models consume as well as on users. Large models cost money regardless of how many people log in.
PostgreSQL: Is PostgreSQL completely free?
Yes. PostgreSQL is completely free and open source with no licensing fees or restrictions on use.
SourceAnaplan: Do we need a systems integrator?
Almost always for the first implementation. The proprietary modelling language and the scale of typical models make an experienced partner or an internal certified team effectively mandatory.
PostgreSQL: What platforms does PostgreSQL run on?
PostgreSQL runs on all major operating systems including Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, and commercial Unix variants, and has been proven highly scalable managing terabytes to petabytes of data.
SourceAnaplan: Who owns Anaplan?
Thoma Bravo, which took it private in 2022 for $10.7bn.
PostgreSQL: What procedural languages are supported?
PostgreSQL supports stored functions and procedures in multiple languages including PL/pgSQL, Perl, Python, Tcl, Java, JavaScript, R, and Rust.
SourceAnaplan: Can it replace our BI tool?
No. It is a planning and calculation platform; most customers still export to Power BI or Tableau for reporting and dashboards.
PostgreSQL: What is ACID compliance in PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL has been ACID-compliant since 2001, ensuring data integrity through atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability guarantees for all transactions.
SourcePostgreSQL: Does PostgreSQL support JSON data?
Yes. PostgreSQL supports JSON and JSONB data types for storing and querying JSON documents, along with XML and other document formats.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Anaplan vs Jedox
- Anaplan vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Anaplan vs Board International
- Anaplan vs Pigment
- Anaplan vs Sisense
- Anaplan vs MicroStrategy
- Anaplan vs GoodData
- Anaplan vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Anaplan vs Dundas BI
- Anaplan vs Glassbox
- Anaplan vs Quantum Metric
- Anaplan vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Anaplan vs Reportz
- Anaplan vs Rill Data
- Anaplan vs Snowplow
- Anaplan vs Stripe Dashboard
- Anaplan vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Anaplan vs MariaDB
- Anaplan vs Oracle Database
- Anaplan vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Anaplan vs IBM Db2
- Anaplan vs Cockroach Labs
- Anaplan vs DuckDB
- Anaplan vs Aiven
- Anaplan vs SQLite
- Anaplan vs Couchbase
- Anaplan vs QuestDB
- Anaplan vs FaunaDB
- Anaplan vs Firestore
- Anaplan vs Amazon Redshift
- Anaplan vs Apache Pinot
- Anaplan vs DataGrip
- Anaplan vs Apache Pulsar
- Anaplan vs Cassandra
- Anaplan vs CouchDB
- PostgreSQL vs Jedox
- PostgreSQL vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- PostgreSQL vs Board International
- PostgreSQL vs Pigment
- PostgreSQL vs Sisense
- PostgreSQL vs MicroStrategy
- PostgreSQL vs GoodData
- PostgreSQL vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- PostgreSQL vs Dundas BI
- PostgreSQL vs Glassbox
- PostgreSQL vs Quantum Metric
- PostgreSQL vs SAP BusinessObjects
- PostgreSQL vs Reportz
- PostgreSQL vs Rill Data
- PostgreSQL vs Snowplow
- PostgreSQL vs Stripe Dashboard
- PostgreSQL vs TIBCO Spotfire
- PostgreSQL vs MariaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Oracle Database
- PostgreSQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
- PostgreSQL vs IBM Db2
- PostgreSQL vs Cockroach Labs
- PostgreSQL vs DuckDB
- PostgreSQL vs Aiven
- PostgreSQL vs SQLite
- PostgreSQL vs Couchbase
- PostgreSQL vs QuestDB
- PostgreSQL vs FaunaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Firestore
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon Redshift
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Pinot
- PostgreSQL vs DataGrip
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Pulsar
- PostgreSQL vs Cassandra
- PostgreSQL vs CouchDB
