Business Intelligence · head to head
Anaplan vs Octopus Deploy

Anaplan
Business Intelligence
Connected planning platform with an in-memory calculation engine for large multidimensional models
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Octopus Deploy
Developer Tools
Continuous delivery and runbook automation for releases
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Octopus Deploy starts at $2080/yr; Anaplan prices on request.
- Where Octopus Deploy falls short: free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Anaplan and Octopus Deploy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Anaplan | Octopus Deploy |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Quote | Subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS | Web |
| Category | Business Intelligence | Developer Tools |
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Anaplan
- Hyperblock calculation engine
- Connected planning
- Scenario and versioning
- Model builder
- Anaplan PlanIQ
- Workflow and approvals
- Application lifecycle management
- Data integration
Only in Octopus Deploy
Nothing recorded that Anaplan does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Anaplan
- Sales territory and quota planning across thousands of reps where a change to segmentation must reflow quota immediatelynot Octopus Deploy
- Demand and supply planning at SKU and location level for a manufacturer with tens of thousands of itemsnot Octopus Deploy
- Workforce planning that ties headcount, cost and capacity to a revenue plan across dozens of business unitsnot Octopus Deploy
- Replacing a spreadsheet estate where the master planning model has become too large and too fragile for Excel to open reliablynot Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
- Automating software deployments across development, testing, productionnot Anaplan
- Automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident responsenot Anaplan
- Managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configurationnot Anaplan
- Tracking DORA metrics and enforcing deployment approval gatesnot Anaplan
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Anaplan
- Workspace is licensed by memory consumed, so a model that grows as the business adds SKUs, regions or scenarios generates a bill increase without a single new user being added, and teams end up optimising models for licence cost rather than clarity
- Model building requires certified Anaplan modellers using a proprietary formula language, and the labour market for that skill is small, so most customers stay dependent on a systems integrator long after go-live
- Thoma Bravo took the company private in 2022 in a $10.7bn deal, and customers have since reported firmer renewal terms; a private-equity owner optimising for cash flow is a real factor in a multi-year planning contract
- Native reporting and visualisation are weak for anything beyond planning grids, so most customers push data out to Power BI or Tableau for executive reporting, adding another tool and another latency point
- Implementations are long. A connected planning programme across finance and supply chain routinely runs six to eighteen months before the first production plan, which is difficult to justify when the business wants a forecast this quarter
Octopus Deploy
- Free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Annual billing is the only option for both Octopus Cloud and Octopus Server; there is no monthly plan
- Professional cloud tier is $4,330 per year and Enterprise cloud is $24,600 per year, with tenants and machines sold as add-ons beyond the free allotment
Pricing, plan by plan
Anaplan
On request- AnaplanOn request
- Licensed by user tier and by workspace capacity
- Workspace charged on memory consumed by models, independent of user count
- Multi-year enterprise agreements are the norm
Octopus Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 10 projects
- 10 tenants
- 10 machines
- Professional (Cloud)$4,330/yr
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Professional (Server)$2,080/yr
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Cloud)$24,600/yr
- 100+ projects supported
- Unlimited spaces and users
- 20 concurrent tasks
Which should you pick?
Choose Anaplan if
- You need hyperblock calculation engine.
- You work on Web, iOS.
- You also want connected planning.
Questions people ask
- Is Anaplan or Octopus Deploy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Anaplan starts at On request and Octopus Deploy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Anaplan or Octopus Deploy?
- Octopus Deploy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Anaplan and Free for Octopus Deploy.
- Does Anaplan or Octopus Deploy run on more platforms?
- Anaplan runs on Web, iOS. Octopus Deploy runs on Web.
- Can I use Octopus Deploy for free?
- Yes. Octopus Deploy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Anaplan starts at On request.
- What is Anaplan best used for?
- Anaplan is most often used for sales territory and quota planning across thousands of reps where a change to segmentation must reflow quota immediately, demand and supply planning at sku and location level for a manufacturer with tens of thousands of items, workforce planning that ties headcount, cost and capacity to a revenue plan across dozens of business units, replacing a spreadsheet estate where the master planning model has become too large and too fragile for excel to open reliably. Of those, sales territory and quota planning across thousands of reps where a change to segmentation must reflow quota immediately and demand and supply planning at sku and location level for a manufacturer with tens of thousands of items are not what Octopus Deploy is typically brought in for.
- What can Anaplan do that Octopus Deploy cannot?
- Anaplan covers Hyperblock calculation engine, Connected planning, Scenario and versioning, Model builder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Anaplan: Why is Anaplan expensive even when user counts are low?
Because workspace is licensed on the memory your models consume as well as on users. Large models cost money regardless of how many people log in.
Octopus Deploy: How much does Octopus Deploy cost?
Octopus Deploy offers a free tier at $0/year with limits on projects (10), users (10), and tenants (10). Professional plans start at $2,080/year for self-hosted or $4,330/year for cloud hosting.
SourceAnaplan: Do we need a systems integrator?
Almost always for the first implementation. The proprietary modelling language and the scale of typical models make an experienced partner or an internal certified team effectively mandatory.
Octopus Deploy: What does the free Octopus Deploy tier include?
The free tier includes 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks, 1TB file storage, 100GB database storage, and community support only.
SourceAnaplan: Who owns Anaplan?
Thoma Bravo, which took it private in 2022 for $10.7bn.
Octopus Deploy: Can I try Octopus Deploy for free before purchasing?
Yes, a free tier is available with unlimited duration but capped usage, plus a 30-day free trial with full Enterprise features is offered to evaluate the platform.
SourceAnaplan: Can it replace our BI tool?
No. It is a planning and calculation platform; most customers still export to Power BI or Tableau for reporting and dashboards.
Octopus Deploy: What are the Enterprise pricing differences between Cloud and Server hosting?
Enterprise Cloud hosting costs $24,600/year and includes 20 concurrent tasks and 24/7 support. Enterprise Server self-hosted costs $15,600/year with flexible concurrent task configuration and 24/7 support.
SourceRelated pages
More on Octopus Deploy
Other head to heads
- Anaplan vs Jedox
- Anaplan vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Anaplan vs Board International
- Anaplan vs Pigment
- Anaplan vs Sisense
- Anaplan vs MicroStrategy
- Anaplan vs GoodData
- Anaplan vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Anaplan vs Dundas BI
- Anaplan vs Glassbox
- Anaplan vs Quantum Metric
- Anaplan vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Anaplan vs ThoughtSpot
- Anaplan vs Cube
- Anaplan vs Cyfe
- Anaplan vs DashThis
- Anaplan vs Deepnote
- Anaplan vs Evidence
- Anaplan vs Harness
- Anaplan vs HCP Terraform
- Anaplan vs Kubernetes
- Anaplan vs Earthly
- Anaplan vs Moonrepo
- Anaplan vs Ansible
- Anaplan vs Argo CD
- Anaplan vs Garden
- Anaplan vs GitLab CI/CD
- Anaplan vs LaunchDarkly
- Anaplan vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Anaplan vs GNAT Pro
- Anaplan vs Cody
- Anaplan vs ConfigCat
- Anaplan vs Cortex
- Anaplan vs Dagger
- Anaplan vs Deep Code
- Anaplan vs Deno
- Octopus Deploy vs Jedox
- Octopus Deploy vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Octopus Deploy vs Board International
- Octopus Deploy vs Pigment
- Octopus Deploy vs Sisense
- Octopus Deploy vs MicroStrategy
- Octopus Deploy vs GoodData
- Octopus Deploy vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Octopus Deploy vs Dundas BI
- Octopus Deploy vs Glassbox
- Octopus Deploy vs Quantum Metric
- Octopus Deploy vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Octopus Deploy vs ThoughtSpot
- Octopus Deploy vs Cube
- Octopus Deploy vs Cyfe
- Octopus Deploy vs DashThis
- Octopus Deploy vs Deepnote
- Octopus Deploy vs Evidence
- Octopus Deploy vs Harness
- Octopus Deploy vs HCP Terraform
- Octopus Deploy vs Kubernetes
- Octopus Deploy vs Earthly
- Octopus Deploy vs Moonrepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Ansible
- Octopus Deploy vs Argo CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Garden
- Octopus Deploy vs GitLab CI/CD
- Octopus Deploy vs LaunchDarkly
- Octopus Deploy vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Octopus Deploy vs GNAT Pro
- Octopus Deploy vs Cody
- Octopus Deploy vs ConfigCat
- Octopus Deploy vs Cortex
- Octopus Deploy vs Dagger
- Octopus Deploy vs Deep Code
- Octopus Deploy vs Deno
