Software · head to head
Amazon Redshift vs YugabyteDB

YugabyteDB
Software
Open source distributed SQL database for cloud native apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift on-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery; YugabyteDB missing PostgreSQL functions and extensions despite claiming compatibility
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, YugabyteDB covers PostgreSQL Compatible.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift and YugabyteDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | YugabyteDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web | Cloud, On-premises, Kubernetes |
| Founded | 2012 | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift
- Columnar Storage
- Massively Parallel
- Machine Learning
- AQUA Acceleration
- Data Sharing
- Federated Query
- Concurrency Scaling
- S3
Only in YugabyteDB
- PostgreSQL Compatible
- Distributed SQL
- Geo-distribution
- Linear Scalability
- High Availability
- ACID Transactions
- CDC Support
- PostgreSQL
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift
- Business intelligencenot YugabyteDB
- Data warehousingnot YugabyteDB
- Real-time analyticsnot YugabyteDB
- Reporting
- Machine learningnot YugabyteDB
YugabyteDB
- Transaction processingnot Amazon Redshift
- Data storagenot Amazon Redshift
- Application backendnot Amazon Redshift
- Reporting
- Data analyticsnot Amazon Redshift
Both are used for reporting, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift
- On-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery
- Requires significant manual tuning including managing concurrency scaling costs and configuring Workload Management queues
- Performance degrades without proper design of distribution keys and sort keys
- Limited elastic resize options - can only halve or double current cluster size
- AWS lock-in makes it unsuitable for multi-cloud architectures
YugabyteDB
- Missing PostgreSQL functions and extensions despite claiming compatibility
- Not a true PostgreSQL replacement requiring schema and query compatibility testing before migration
- Requires careful isolation level management or risk data corruption in production
- Lacks built-in OLAP capabilities, requiring external systems for analytics
- Coupled compute and storage scaling reduces optimization flexibility
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift
Free- Free TrialFree
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- 2 months free
- Full features
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Pay per node hour
- All features
- Standard support
YugabyteDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the YugabyteDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift if
- You need columnar storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want massively parallel.
Choose YugabyteDB if
- You need postgresql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, On-premises, Kubernetes.
- You also want distributed sql.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift or YugabyteDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift starts at Free and YugabyteDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift or YugabyteDB?
- Amazon Redshift starts at Free and YugabyteDB at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift or YugabyteDB run on more platforms?
- Amazon Redshift runs on Web. YugabyteDB runs on Cloud, On-premises, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift best used for?
- Amazon Redshift is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what YugabyteDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift do that YugabyteDB cannot?
- Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Massively Parallel, Machine Learning, AQUA Acceleration. YugabyteDB covers PostgreSQL Compatible, Distributed SQL, Geo-distribution, Linear Scalability. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Redshift: What deployment options does Amazon Redshift offer?
Redshift offers Provisioned Cluster (with RA3 or DC2 nodes) and Serverless options to match varying workloads. The new Redshift RG instance family, powered by Graviton, delivers 2.4x faster performance than RA3 at 30% lower cost per vCPU.
SourceYugabyteDB: Is YugabyteDB a true drop-in replacement for PostgreSQL?
No, YugabyteDB is PostgreSQL-compatible but not a zero-change drop-in replacement. It requires compatibility testing with queries, stored procedures, and ORM configurations before migration.
SourceAmazon Redshift: What does Amazon Redshift cost?
Provisioned cluster pricing: RA3 on-demand starts at $1.086/hour for ra3.xlplus. Serverless costs approximately $0.375 per RPU-hour with 4-RPU minimum (roughly $1.50/hour active workload). Managed storage costs $0.024/GB-month.
SourceYugabyteDB: What isolation levels does YugabyteDB support?
YugabyteDB allows per-query selection between serializable isolation for critical operations and read-committed for analytics. However, this flexibility requires careful management to avoid accidental data corruption.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Does Redshift work with data lakes?
Yes, Redshift's integrated data lake query engine processes workloads on Apache Iceberg tables and other supported formats in Amazon S3, allowing you to run SQL analytics across your data warehouse and data lake from the same engine.
SourceYugabyteDB: Does YugabyteDB support both SQL and NoSQL workloads?
Yes, YugabyteDB offers YSQL for PostgreSQL-compatible SQL and YCQL for Cassandra-like NoSQL workloads, using the same DocDB storage engine to support both simultaneously.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Is there a free tier for Amazon Redshift?
AWS offers a free trial with $300 USD in Serverless credits valid for 90 days, but Redshift is not part of the permanent AWS Free Tier.
SourceYugabyteDB: Can YugabyteDB scale compute and storage independently?
No, YugabyteDB couples compute and storage scaling, unlike TiDB which separates them. This means scaling decisions are less flexible and optimization is more complex.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Redshift
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Redshift vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Redshift vs Airtable
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon Redshift vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Redshift vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Redshift vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Redshift vs Couchbase
- Amazon Redshift vs DuckDB
- Amazon Redshift vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Redshift vs MariaDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Redshift vs Cassandra
- Amazon Redshift vs CouchDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebolt
- YugabyteDB vs Cockroach Labs
- YugabyteDB vs PostgreSQL
- YugabyteDB vs Airtable
- YugabyteDB vs Amazon Aurora
- YugabyteDB vs Elasticsearch
- YugabyteDB vs PlanetScale
- YugabyteDB vs Azure SQL
- YugabyteDB vs ClickHouse
- YugabyteDB vs Couchbase
- YugabyteDB vs DuckDB
- YugabyteDB vs DynamoDB
- YugabyteDB vs MariaDB
- YugabyteDB vs Oracle Database
- YugabyteDB vs Amazon RDS
- YugabyteDB vs Apache Druid
- YugabyteDB vs Cassandra
- YugabyteDB vs CouchDB
- YugabyteDB vs Firebolt

