Software · head to head
Amazon Redshift vs Vagrant
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift on-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery; Vagrant vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Vagrant covers Box management.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift and Vagrant actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | Vagrant |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | open-source |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Windows, Mac |
| Founded | 2012 | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift
- Columnar Storage
- Massively Parallel
- Machine Learning
- AQUA Acceleration
- Data Sharing
- Federated Query
- Concurrency Scaling
- S3
Only in Vagrant
- Box management
- Provider support
- Multi-machine setups
- Provisioners
- Networking
- Synced folders
- Snapshots
- Plugins
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift
- Business intelligencenot Vagrant
- Data warehousingnot Vagrant
- Real-time analyticsnot Vagrant
- Reportingnot Vagrant
- Machine learningnot Vagrant
Vagrant
- Reproducible local development environments defined in a Vagrantfilenot Amazon Redshift
- Provisioning identical VMs across VirtualBox, VMware and Hyper-V for a teamnot Amazon Redshift
- Sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptopnot Amazon Redshift
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift
- On-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery
- Requires significant manual tuning including managing concurrency scaling costs and configuring Workload Management queues
- Performance degrades without proper design of distribution keys and sort keys
- Limited elastic resize options - can only halve or double current cluster size
- AWS lock-in makes it unsuitable for multi-cloud architectures
Vagrant
- Vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vagrant to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vagrant
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published
- Uses that fall outside the Additional Use Grant require a separately negotiated licence from the licensor
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift
Free- Free TrialFree
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- 2 months free
- Full features
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Pay per node hour
- All features
- Standard support
Vagrant
Free- Open SourceFree
- Development environment provisioning
- Multiple providers
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift if
- You need columnar storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want massively parallel.
Choose Vagrant if
- You need box management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want provider support.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift or Vagrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Vagrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift or Vagrant?
- Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Vagrant at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift or Vagrant run on more platforms?
- Amazon Redshift runs on Web. Vagrant runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift best used for?
- Amazon Redshift is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what Vagrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift do that Vagrant cannot?
- Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Massively Parallel, Machine Learning, AQUA Acceleration. Vagrant covers Box management, Provider support, Multi-machine setups, Provisioners.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Redshift: What deployment options does Amazon Redshift offer?
Redshift offers Provisioned Cluster (with RA3 or DC2 nodes) and Serverless options to match varying workloads. The new Redshift RG instance family, powered by Graviton, delivers 2.4x faster performance than RA3 at 30% lower cost per vCPU.
SourceAmazon Redshift: What does Amazon Redshift cost?
Provisioned cluster pricing: RA3 on-demand starts at $1.086/hour for ra3.xlplus. Serverless costs approximately $0.375 per RPU-hour with 4-RPU minimum (roughly $1.50/hour active workload). Managed storage costs $0.024/GB-month.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Does Redshift work with data lakes?
Yes, Redshift's integrated data lake query engine processes workloads on Apache Iceberg tables and other supported formats in Amazon S3, allowing you to run SQL analytics across your data warehouse and data lake from the same engine.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Is there a free tier for Amazon Redshift?
AWS offers a free trial with $300 USD in Serverless credits valid for 90 days, but Redshift is not part of the permanent AWS Free Tier.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Redshift
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Redshift vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Redshift vs Airtable
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon Redshift vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Redshift vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Redshift vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Redshift vs Couchbase
- Amazon Redshift vs DuckDB
- Amazon Redshift vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Redshift vs MariaDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Redshift vs Cassandra
- Amazon Redshift vs CouchDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebolt
- Amazon Redshift vs Grafana Cloud
- Amazon Redshift vs Neon
- Amazon Redshift vs DigitalOcean
- Amazon Redshift vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Amazon Redshift vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Amazon Redshift vs Deno Deploy
- Amazon Redshift vs Heroku
- Amazon Redshift vs Hetzner Cloud
- Amazon Redshift vs Linode
- Amazon Redshift vs Packer
- Amazon Redshift vs Pulumi
- Amazon Redshift vs Render
- Amazon Redshift vs Upstash
- Amazon Redshift vs Vultr
- Amazon Redshift vs Akamai
- Amazon Redshift vs Alibaba Cloud
- Amazon Redshift vs Chef
- Amazon Redshift vs Contabo
- Vagrant vs Cockroach Labs
- Vagrant vs PostgreSQL
- Vagrant vs Airtable
- Vagrant vs Amazon Aurora
- Vagrant vs Elasticsearch
- Vagrant vs PlanetScale
- Vagrant vs Azure SQL
- Vagrant vs ClickHouse
- Vagrant vs Couchbase
- Vagrant vs DuckDB
- Vagrant vs DynamoDB
- Vagrant vs MariaDB
- Vagrant vs Oracle Database
- Vagrant vs Amazon RDS
- Vagrant vs Apache Druid
- Vagrant vs Cassandra
- Vagrant vs CouchDB
- Vagrant vs Firebolt
- Vagrant vs Grafana Cloud
- Vagrant vs Neon
- Vagrant vs DigitalOcean
- Vagrant vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vagrant vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Vagrant vs Deno Deploy
- Vagrant vs Heroku
- Vagrant vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vagrant vs Linode
- Vagrant vs Packer
- Vagrant vs Pulumi
- Vagrant vs Render
- Vagrant vs Upstash
- Vagrant vs Vultr
- Vagrant vs Akamai
- Vagrant vs Alibaba Cloud
- Vagrant vs Chef
- Vagrant vs Contabo


