Software · head to head
Amazon Redshift vs Packer
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift on-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery; Packer packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Packer covers Image building.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift and Packer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | Packer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | open-source |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Windows, Mac |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift
- Columnar Storage
- Massively Parallel
- Machine Learning
- AQUA Acceleration
- Data Sharing
- Federated Query
- Concurrency Scaling
- S3
Only in Packer
- Image building
- Multi-platform support
- Provisioners
- Builders
- Post-processors
- Variables
- Data sources
- Validation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift
- Business intelligencenot Packer
- Data warehousingnot Packer
- Real-time analyticsnot Packer
- Reportingnot Packer
- Machine learningnot Packer
Packer
- Building identical machine images for multiple clouds from one templatenot Amazon Redshift
- Baking golden AMIs and VM images into a CI pipelinenot Amazon Redshift
- Creating immutable infrastructure artifacts consumed by Terraformnot Amazon Redshift
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift
- On-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery
- Requires significant manual tuning including managing concurrency scaling costs and configuring Workload Management queues
- Performance degrades without proper design of distribution keys and sort keys
- Limited elastic resize options - can only halve or double current cluster size
- AWS lock-in makes it unsuitable for multi-cloud architectures
Packer
- Packer 1.10.0 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Packer to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Packer
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published, and the Change Date is set separately per version
- Alternative licensing for uses outside the grant must be arranged with the licensor rather than taken under the public licence
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift
Free- Free TrialFree
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- 2 months free
- Full features
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Pay per node hour
- All features
- Standard support
Packer
Free- Open SourceFree
- Multi-platform image building
- Template-driven
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift if
- You need columnar storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want massively parallel.
Choose Packer if
- You need image building.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want multi-platform support.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift or Packer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Packer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift or Packer?
- Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Packer at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift or Packer run on more platforms?
- Amazon Redshift runs on Web. Packer runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift best used for?
- Amazon Redshift is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what Packer is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift do that Packer cannot?
- Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Massively Parallel, Machine Learning, AQUA Acceleration. Packer covers Image building, Multi-platform support, Provisioners, Builders.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Redshift: What deployment options does Amazon Redshift offer?
Redshift offers Provisioned Cluster (with RA3 or DC2 nodes) and Serverless options to match varying workloads. The new Redshift RG instance family, powered by Graviton, delivers 2.4x faster performance than RA3 at 30% lower cost per vCPU.
SourceAmazon Redshift: What does Amazon Redshift cost?
Provisioned cluster pricing: RA3 on-demand starts at $1.086/hour for ra3.xlplus. Serverless costs approximately $0.375 per RPU-hour with 4-RPU minimum (roughly $1.50/hour active workload). Managed storage costs $0.024/GB-month.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Does Redshift work with data lakes?
Yes, Redshift's integrated data lake query engine processes workloads on Apache Iceberg tables and other supported formats in Amazon S3, allowing you to run SQL analytics across your data warehouse and data lake from the same engine.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Is there a free tier for Amazon Redshift?
AWS offers a free trial with $300 USD in Serverless credits valid for 90 days, but Redshift is not part of the permanent AWS Free Tier.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Redshift
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Redshift vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Redshift vs Airtable
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon Redshift vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Redshift vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Redshift vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Redshift vs Couchbase
- Amazon Redshift vs DuckDB
- Amazon Redshift vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Redshift vs MariaDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Redshift vs Cassandra
- Amazon Redshift vs CouchDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebolt
- Amazon Redshift vs Grafana Cloud
- Amazon Redshift vs Neon
- Amazon Redshift vs DigitalOcean
- Amazon Redshift vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Amazon Redshift vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Amazon Redshift vs Deno Deploy
- Amazon Redshift vs Heroku
- Amazon Redshift vs Hetzner Cloud
- Amazon Redshift vs Linode
- Amazon Redshift vs Pulumi
- Amazon Redshift vs Render
- Amazon Redshift vs Upstash
- Amazon Redshift vs Vagrant
- Amazon Redshift vs Vultr
- Amazon Redshift vs Akamai
- Amazon Redshift vs Alibaba Cloud
- Amazon Redshift vs Chef
- Amazon Redshift vs Contabo
- Packer vs Cockroach Labs
- Packer vs PostgreSQL
- Packer vs Airtable
- Packer vs Amazon Aurora
- Packer vs Elasticsearch
- Packer vs PlanetScale
- Packer vs Azure SQL
- Packer vs ClickHouse
- Packer vs Couchbase
- Packer vs DuckDB
- Packer vs DynamoDB
- Packer vs MariaDB
- Packer vs Oracle Database
- Packer vs Amazon RDS
- Packer vs Apache Druid
- Packer vs Cassandra
- Packer vs CouchDB
- Packer vs Firebolt
- Packer vs Grafana Cloud
- Packer vs Neon
- Packer vs DigitalOcean
- Packer vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Packer vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Packer vs Deno Deploy
- Packer vs Heroku
- Packer vs Hetzner Cloud
- Packer vs Linode
- Packer vs Pulumi
- Packer vs Render
- Packer vs Upstash
- Packer vs Vagrant
- Packer vs Vultr
- Packer vs Akamai
- Packer vs Alibaba Cloud
- Packer vs Chef
- Packer vs Contabo

