Business Intelligence · head to head
Amazon QuickSight vs Amazon Redshift ML

Amazon QuickSight
Business Intelligence
Scalable, serverless BI by AWS
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -

Amazon Redshift ML
Machine Learning
SQL statements in Redshift that train models on SageMaker and return them as functions
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Amazon Redshift ML has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Amazon QuickSight reader and Reader Pro roles charged separately at $3 and $20/month; Amazon Redshift ML training is billed by SageMaker separately from Redshift, so a feature that looks like a free SQL statement produces a second line item on a different part of the bill that the analyst who ran it usually cannot see.
- They diverge on capability: Amazon QuickSight covers SPICE In-memory Engine, Amazon Redshift ML covers CREATE MODEL in SQL.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon QuickSight and Amazon Redshift ML actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon QuickSight | Amazon Redshift ML |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/month | Free |
| Pricing model | per-user | usage-based |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | AWS | Web |
| Category | Business Intelligence | Machine Learning |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), founded (2006).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon QuickSight
- SPICE In-memory Engine
- ML Insights
- Natural Language Queries
- Embedded Analytics
- Pay-per-session
- Redshift
- S3
- Athena
Only in Amazon Redshift ML
- CREATE MODEL in SQL
- Automatic model selection
- Local inference
- Bring your own model
- Algorithm selection
- Cost ceiling controls
- Existing warehouse security
- Batch and interactive scoring
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon QuickSight
- Business intelligencenot Amazon Redshift ML
- Dashboard creationnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Data visualizationnot Amazon Redshift ML
Amazon Redshift ML
- Adding a churn or propensity score to an existing dashboard where the data is already in Redshift and nobody needs a bespoke modelnot Amazon QuickSight
- Letting an analytics team test whether a predictive column has any business value before asking for data science headcountnot Amazon QuickSight
- Scoring rows inside a SQL pipeline where moving data out to a separate service would add fragility for little benefitnot Amazon QuickSight
- Organisations committed to AWS whose main constraint is a data science backlog rather than modelling sophisticationnot Amazon QuickSight
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon QuickSight
- Reader and Reader Pro roles charged separately at $3 and $20/month
- Author and Author Pro roles charged at $24 and $40/month
- $250/month infrastructure fee required if Pro users or Q&A enabled
- SPICE storage charged at $0.38/GB monthly (10 GB included)
- Pixel-perfect reports start at $500/month for 500 monthly units
- Alerts charged at $0.05-$0.50 per 1,000 metrics evaluated
Amazon Redshift ML
- Training is billed by SageMaker separately from Redshift, so a feature that looks like a free SQL statement produces a second line item on a different part of the bill that the analyst who ran it usually cannot see.
- Autopilot searches many candidate models by default and the duration and cost of CREATE MODEL scale with the data size and the MAX_CELLS setting, so an unconstrained statement against a large table is an expensive accident rather than an experiment.
- Local inference runs on the Redshift cluster itself, so scoring millions of rows competes for the resources the warehouse exists to provide, and the remote inference alternative adds a per-batch network call plus an hourly SageMaker endpoint charge that persists whether or not anyone queries it.
- The supported problem types are limited to what the exposed algorithms cover, so anything involving text, images, sequences, a custom loss function or a bespoke evaluation metric is out of scope and has to be built conventionally.
- There is no retraining schedule, drift detection or model registry, so a model created by a statement stays exactly as trained until somebody remembers to recreate it, and nothing in the warehouse will report that its accuracy has decayed.
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon QuickSight
$3/month- Reader$3/month
- Dashboard viewing only
- Reader Pro$20/month
- Enhanced reader capabilities
- Author$24/month
- Dashboard creation and editing
- Author Pro$40/month
- Advanced authoring features
Amazon Redshift ML
Free- Free TrialFree
- 2-month trial
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Per-node pricing
- SageMaker training
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon QuickSight if
- You need spice in-memory engine.
- You work on AWS.
- You also want ml insights.
Choose Amazon Redshift ML if
- You need create model in sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automatic model selection.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon QuickSight or Amazon Redshift ML better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon QuickSight starts at $3/month and Amazon Redshift ML at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon QuickSight or Amazon Redshift ML?
- Amazon Redshift ML has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3/month for Amazon QuickSight and Free for Amazon Redshift ML.
- Does Amazon QuickSight or Amazon Redshift ML run on more platforms?
- Amazon QuickSight runs on AWS. Amazon Redshift ML runs on Web.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift ML for free?
- Yes. Amazon Redshift ML has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Amazon QuickSight starts at $3/month.
- What is Amazon QuickSight best used for?
- Amazon QuickSight is most often used for business intelligence, dashboard creation, data visualization. Of those, business intelligence and dashboard creation are not what Amazon Redshift ML is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon QuickSight do that Amazon Redshift ML cannot?
- Amazon QuickSight covers SPICE In-memory Engine, ML Insights, Natural Language Queries, Embedded Analytics. Amazon Redshift ML covers CREATE MODEL in SQL, Automatic model selection, Local inference, Bring your own model.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon QuickSight: What does Amazon QuickSight cost per user?
QuickSight pricing varies by user role. Readers start at $3/month, Reader Pro at $20/month, Authors at $24/month, and Author Pro at $40/month. All prices are per user per month.
SourceAmazon Redshift ML: Does it require SageMaker?
Yes. Redshift ML is an interface; the training happens in SageMaker and needs an IAM role and an S3 bucket for the intermediate data.
Amazon QuickSight: Does QuickSight charge an infrastructure fee?
Yes, QuickSight charges an infrastructure fee of $250/month per account if the account has at least one Pro user, has Q&A enabled via topics, or has dashboard Q&A enabled.
SourceAmazon Redshift ML: Is there an extra charge?
The SQL interface is part of Redshift, but the training runs as a SageMaker job charged at SageMaker rates, and a remote inference endpoint is billed for as long as it exists.
Amazon QuickSight: What are QuickSight's session capacity pricing options?
Session capacity pricing starts at $250/month for 500 sessions. Annual plans range from $20,000/year for 50,000 sessions to $258,000/year for 1,600,000 sessions, with volume discounts reducing unit costs from $0.50 to $0.16 per additional session.
SourceAmazon Redshift ML: What kinds of model can it build?
Regression, binary and multiclass classification through the automatic path, plus direct use of XGBoost, linear learner, multilayer perceptron and K-means. Anything beyond structured tabular prediction is out of scope.
Amazon QuickSight: How much does additional SPICE storage cost?
Additional SPICE storage beyond the included 10 GB costs $0.38 per GB per month. Authors receive 10 GB included, but Readers do not.
SourceAmazon Redshift ML: Can I use a model I trained myself?
Yes, through the bring-your-own-model path, either compiled into the cluster for local inference or called as a remote SageMaker endpoint.
Amazon Redshift ML: Does it retrain automatically?
No. Retraining means running CREATE MODEL again, on a schedule you build yourself, and nothing in the product monitors whether it is needed.
Related pages
More on Amazon QuickSight
More on Amazon Redshift ML
Other head to heads
- Amazon QuickSight vs Power BI
- Amazon QuickSight vs Domo
- Amazon QuickSight vs Chartio
- Amazon QuickSight vs Preset
- Amazon QuickSight vs MicroStrategy
- Amazon QuickSight vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Amazon QuickSight vs ThoughtSpot
- Amazon QuickSight vs Periscope Data
- Amazon QuickSight vs Cyfe
- Amazon QuickSight vs Exa
- Amazon QuickSight vs Hebbia
- Amazon QuickSight vs Stripe Dashboard
- Amazon QuickSight vs Cabin
- Amazon QuickSight vs Celonis
- Amazon QuickSight vs ChartMogul
- Amazon QuickSight vs DashThis
- Amazon QuickSight vs Google Vertex AI
- Amazon QuickSight vs DataRobot
- Amazon QuickSight vs Azure Machine Learning
- Amazon QuickSight vs MATLAB
- Amazon QuickSight vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Amazon QuickSight vs RapidMiner
- Amazon QuickSight vs Databricks
- Amazon QuickSight vs SAS
- Amazon QuickSight vs scikit-learn
- Amazon QuickSight vs H2O.ai
- Amazon QuickSight vs Weka
- Amazon QuickSight vs DVC
- Amazon QuickSight vs Hugging Face
- Amazon QuickSight vs Kubeflow
- Amazon QuickSight vs Langwatch
- Amazon QuickSight vs LlamaIndex
- Amazon QuickSight vs BigQuery ML
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Power BI
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Domo
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Chartio
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Preset
- Amazon Redshift ML vs MicroStrategy
- Amazon Redshift ML vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Amazon Redshift ML vs ThoughtSpot
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Periscope Data
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Cyfe
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Exa
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Hebbia
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Stripe Dashboard
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Cabin
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Celonis
- Amazon Redshift ML vs ChartMogul
- Amazon Redshift ML vs DashThis
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Google Vertex AI
- Amazon Redshift ML vs DataRobot
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- Amazon Redshift ML vs MATLAB
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Amazon Redshift ML vs RapidMiner
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Databricks
- Amazon Redshift ML vs SAS
- Amazon Redshift ML vs scikit-learn
- Amazon Redshift ML vs H2O.ai
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Weka
- Amazon Redshift ML vs DVC
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Hugging Face
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Kubeflow
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Langwatch
- Amazon Redshift ML vs LlamaIndex
- Amazon Redshift ML vs BigQuery ML
