Software · head to head
Amazon QuickSight vs Redash

Amazon QuickSight
Software
Scalable, serverless BI by AWS
- From
- $3/month per user
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Redash has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Amazon QuickSight reader and Reader Pro roles charged separately at $3 and $20/month; Redash a basic self-hosted deployment needs a minimum of 4GB of RAM, and more RAM and CPU as background workers and API processes grow
- They diverge on capability: Amazon QuickSight covers SPICE In-memory Engine, Redash covers SQL Query Editor.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon QuickSight and Redash actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon QuickSight | Redash |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/month per user | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | AWS | Web, Self-hosted, Cloud |
| Founded | 2006 | 2013 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon QuickSight
- SPICE In-memory Engine
- ML Insights
- Natural Language Queries
- Embedded Analytics
- Pay-per-session
- S3
- Athena
- Aurora
Only in Redash
- SQL Query Editor
- Multiple Data Sources
- Visualizations
- Dashboards
- Alerts
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- BigQuery
Both cover
- Redshift
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon QuickSight
- Business intelligence dashboards and analyticsnot Redash
- Scalable embedded analytics for applicationsnot Redash
Redash
- Self-hosted SQL query editor and dashboarding over existing databasesnot Amazon QuickSight
- Sharing scheduled query results with a team without buying a BI licencenot Amazon QuickSight
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon QuickSight
- Reader and Reader Pro roles charged separately at $3 and $20/month
- Author and Author Pro roles charged at $24 and $40/month
- $250/month infrastructure fee required if Pro users or Q&A enabled
- SPICE storage charged at $0.38/GB monthly (10 GB included)
- Pixel-perfect reports start at $500/month for 500 monthly units
- Alerts charged at $0.05-$0.50 per 1,000 metrics evaluated
Redash
- A basic self-hosted deployment needs a minimum of 4GB of RAM, and more RAM and CPU as background workers and API processes grow
- The official Docker images were not updated for V10, so the documented route is to deploy a V8 instance and then upgrade it
- Anyone not using a provided cloud image has to configure the environment variables and secrets by hand
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon QuickSight
$3/month per userNo published plan breakdown. See the Amazon QuickSight review.
Redash
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full Features
- Self-hosted
- Community Support
- Cloud$49/month
- Managed Hosting
- Automatic Updates
- Support
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon QuickSight if
- You need spice in-memory engine.
- You work on AWS.
- You also want ml insights.
Choose Redash if
- You need sql query editor.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- You also want multiple data sources.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon QuickSight or Redash better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon QuickSight starts at $3/month per user and Redash at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon QuickSight or Redash?
- Redash has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3/month per user for Amazon QuickSight and Free for Redash.
- Does Amazon QuickSight or Redash run on more platforms?
- Amazon QuickSight runs on AWS. Redash runs on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- Can I use Redash for free?
- Yes. Redash has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Amazon QuickSight starts at $3/month per user.
- What is Amazon QuickSight best used for?
- Amazon QuickSight is most often used for business intelligence dashboards and analytics, scalable embedded analytics for applications. Of those, business intelligence dashboards and analytics and scalable embedded analytics for applications are not what Redash is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon QuickSight do that Redash cannot?
- Amazon QuickSight covers SPICE In-memory Engine, ML Insights, Natural Language Queries, Embedded Analytics. Redash covers SQL Query Editor, Multiple Data Sources, Visualizations, Dashboards. Both handle Redshift, Web support.
Related pages
More on Amazon QuickSight
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon QuickSight vs Power BI
- Amazon QuickSight vs Sisense
- Amazon QuickSight vs MicroStrategy
- Amazon QuickSight vs Qlik Sense
- Amazon QuickSight vs Domo
- Amazon QuickSight vs GoodData
- Amazon QuickSight vs ThoughtSpot
- Amazon QuickSight vs Google Data Studio
- Amazon QuickSight vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Amazon QuickSight vs Mode
- Amazon QuickSight vs Periscope Data
- Amazon QuickSight vs Baremetrics
- Amazon QuickSight vs Celonis
- Amazon QuickSight vs Chartio
- Amazon QuickSight vs ChartMogul
- Amazon QuickSight vs Cyfe
- Amazon QuickSight vs Databox
- Amazon QuickSight vs Dundas BI
- Amazon QuickSight vs Tableau
- Amazon QuickSight vs Looker
- Amazon QuickSight vs Metabase
- Amazon QuickSight vs Fibery
- Amazon QuickSight vs Apache Superset
- Amazon QuickSight vs Baserow
- Amazon QuickSight vs Budibase
- Amazon QuickSight vs NocoDB
- Redash vs Power BI
- Redash vs Sisense
- Redash vs MicroStrategy
- Redash vs Qlik Sense
- Redash vs Domo
- Redash vs GoodData
- Redash vs ThoughtSpot
- Redash vs Google Data Studio
- Redash vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Redash vs Mode
- Redash vs Periscope Data
- Redash vs Baremetrics
- Redash vs Celonis
- Redash vs Chartio
- Redash vs ChartMogul
- Redash vs Cyfe
- Redash vs Databox
- Redash vs Dundas BI
- Redash vs Tableau
- Redash vs Looker
- Redash vs Metabase
- Redash vs Fibery
- Redash vs Apache Superset
- Redash vs Baserow
- Redash vs Budibase
- Redash vs NocoDB

