Software · head to head
Amazon QuickSight vs Looker

Amazon QuickSight
Software
Scalable, serverless BI by AWS
- From
- $3/month per user
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon QuickSight reader and Reader Pro roles charged separately at $3 and $20/month; Looker requires annual commitment with no month-to-month billing option
- They diverge on capability: Amazon QuickSight covers SPICE In-memory Engine, Looker covers LookML Data Modeling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon QuickSight and Looker actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon QuickSight | Looker |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/month per user | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Platforms | AWS | Web, Cloud (Google Cloud Platform) |
| Founded | 2006 | 2008 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon QuickSight
- SPICE In-memory Engine
- ML Insights
- Natural Language Queries
- Pay-per-session
- S3
- Athena
- Aurora
- RDS
Only in Looker
- LookML Data Modeling
- API Access
- Version Control
- Data Actions
- BigQuery
- Snowflake
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
Both cover
- Embedded Analytics
- Redshift
- Salesforce
- Web support
- Mobile support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon QuickSight
- Business intelligence dashboards and analyticsnot Looker
- Scalable embedded analytics for applicationsnot Looker
Looker
- Business intelligence and interactive dashboards for data-driven decision makingnot Amazon QuickSight
- Embedded analytics for integrating BI capabilities into third-party applicationsnot Amazon QuickSight
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon QuickSight
- Reader and Reader Pro roles charged separately at $3 and $20/month
- Author and Author Pro roles charged at $24 and $40/month
- $250/month infrastructure fee required if Pro users or Q&A enabled
- SPICE storage charged at $0.38/GB monthly (10 GB included)
- Pixel-perfect reports start at $500/month for 500 monthly units
- Alerts charged at $0.05-$0.50 per 1,000 metrics evaluated
Looker
- Requires annual commitment with no month-to-month billing option
- Conversational analytics will incur token overage charges ($3.00 per 1M input tokens, $20.00 per 1M output tokens) after October 1, 2026
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon QuickSight
$3/month per userNo published plan breakdown. See the Amazon QuickSight review.
Looker
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Looker review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon QuickSight if
- You need spice in-memory engine.
- You work on AWS.
- You also want ml insights.
Choose Looker if
- You need lookml data modeling.
- You work on Web, Cloud (Google Cloud Platform).
- You also want api access.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon QuickSight or Looker better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon QuickSight starts at $3/month per user and Looker at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon QuickSight or Looker?
- Amazon QuickSight starts at $3/month per user and Looker at On request.
- Does Amazon QuickSight or Looker run on more platforms?
- Amazon QuickSight runs on AWS. Looker runs on Web, Cloud (Google Cloud Platform).
- What is Amazon QuickSight best used for?
- Amazon QuickSight is most often used for business intelligence dashboards and analytics, scalable embedded analytics for applications. Of those, business intelligence dashboards and analytics and scalable embedded analytics for applications are not what Looker is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon QuickSight do that Looker cannot?
- Amazon QuickSight covers SPICE In-memory Engine, ML Insights, Natural Language Queries, Pay-per-session. Looker covers LookML Data Modeling, API Access, Version Control, Data Actions. Both handle Embedded Analytics, Redshift, Salesforce, Web support.
Related pages
More on Amazon QuickSight
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon QuickSight vs Power BI
- Amazon QuickSight vs Sisense
- Amazon QuickSight vs MicroStrategy
- Amazon QuickSight vs Qlik Sense
- Amazon QuickSight vs Domo
- Amazon QuickSight vs GoodData
- Amazon QuickSight vs ThoughtSpot
- Amazon QuickSight vs Google Data Studio
- Amazon QuickSight vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Amazon QuickSight vs Mode
- Amazon QuickSight vs Periscope Data
- Amazon QuickSight vs Baremetrics
- Amazon QuickSight vs Celonis
- Amazon QuickSight vs Chartio
- Amazon QuickSight vs ChartMogul
- Amazon QuickSight vs Cyfe
- Amazon QuickSight vs Databox
- Amazon QuickSight vs Dundas BI
- Amazon QuickSight vs Tableau
- Amazon QuickSight vs Metabase
- Amazon QuickSight vs Redash
- Amazon QuickSight vs Fibery
- Amazon QuickSight vs Apache Superset
- Amazon QuickSight vs Baserow
- Amazon QuickSight vs Budibase
- Amazon QuickSight vs NocoDB
- Looker vs Power BI
- Looker vs Sisense
- Looker vs MicroStrategy
- Looker vs Qlik Sense
- Looker vs Domo
- Looker vs GoodData
- Looker vs ThoughtSpot
- Looker vs Google Data Studio
- Looker vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Looker vs Mode
- Looker vs Periscope Data
- Looker vs Baremetrics
- Looker vs Celonis
- Looker vs Chartio
- Looker vs ChartMogul
- Looker vs Cyfe
- Looker vs Databox
- Looker vs Dundas BI
- Looker vs Tableau
- Looker vs Metabase
- Looker vs Redash
- Looker vs Fibery
- Looker vs Apache Superset
- Looker vs Baserow
- Looker vs Budibase
- Looker vs NocoDB

